Skip to comments.
(Vanity) Can An Atheist Be a Genuine Conservative?
Comtedemaistre
Posted on 01/19/2006 3:56:16 AM PST by ComtedeMaistre
Most conservatives are religious. But there is a small minority of non-religious individuals, who were attracted to the conservative movement because they were influenced by secular movements such as Ayn Rand's objectivism.
Should atheists be welcomed into the conservative movement? Do atheists make good conservatives?
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: atheists; conservatism; flamebait; nationalreview; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 401-406 next last
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Are you saying that conservatism is based on religion?
That religion is a requirement for conservatism?
I am a life long atheist, and I am among the most conservative members of our local republican central committee. I have been accused (in good humor) of being "to the right of Ghengis Kahn"!
Reading the post of this thread it appears that we cannot even agree on what conservatism means (no surprise with all the knee-jerk liberalism that commonly erupts in many threads), now we have to argue weather or not it is a religious stance?
Silly me, I always thought that conservatism was related to supporting and defending our secular constitution and BOR as intended by this nations founders.
I insist on leaving religion to remain a personal choice, with no legitimate role in determining law, lest we one day wake to find ourselves compelled to join a single Gov. Org. mandated faith.
Think "Church of England", or at the rate it is growing here, "Islam"!
301
posted on
01/19/2006 9:56:48 AM PST
by
Richard-SIA
("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
To: Old Professer; PaulaB
"..but when all is said and done, darkness will prevail."
Actually, I think its more along the lines of "every knee shall bow, every tongue confess..."
302
posted on
01/19/2006 9:56:51 AM PST
by
Maximus of Texas
(On my signal, unleash some real Cowboys to kick some Brokeback Mountain butt!)
To: ComtedeMaistre
ComtedeMaistre wrote:
Religion is not the only value system, but it is the MAIN value system for most people in America and the world.
Most people are not educated enough to be able to engage in the abstract high level reasoning, needed to formulate a set of secular moral values which to live under.
Hmmmm.. I'd say that most everyone learns at their mothers breast the worlds main value system, the golden rule. -- 'Don't bite the teat that feeds you'..
Simple religious teachings work for most people.
Can't get much simpler than "Do onto others" ...
To: Junior
Please do not fall into the liberal trap that all our rights are spelled out in the Constitution. Just because something is not enumerated therein does not mean it is not a right reserved to the individual or to the state.What they mean is "Congress shall make no laws..." All other rights are reserved to the States are they not?
304
posted on
01/19/2006 10:01:13 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: ComtedeMaistre
I was once both an atheist and a conservative. One doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the other.
305
posted on
01/19/2006 10:04:09 AM PST
by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: ComtedeMaistre
Should atheists be welcomed into the conservative movement? Do atheists make good conservatives?**************
Yes, if they are both fiscal and social conservatives.
306
posted on
01/19/2006 10:04:16 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Right Wing Professor
"You seem to have settled for less than one."
Very, I dunno, deep.
307
posted on
01/19/2006 10:04:57 AM PST
by
RobRoy
To: rhombus
308
posted on
01/19/2006 10:05:08 AM PST
by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: joesbucks
Only a small percentage of ministries, most notably Billy Graham's organization, are actively grooming a successor. Franklin Graham is far more politically conservative than his evangelist father. Whether the younger Graham will become a political activist is unknown. Focus on the Family, the current "800 pound gorilla" of the evangelical world, seems to lack a succession plan, and James Dobson, who turns 70 this year, has had problems with both heart disease and cancer. Jerry Falwell, who also has had serious medical issues, will leave an institutional legacy with Liberty University and his church, but probably not much else. As for Pat Robertson, he may have intended to groom his son, Gordon Robertson, to take over his media and educational interests, but he obviously has a problem stepping out of the limelight.
Up and coming leaders among evangelicals include Rick Warren (who falls into the anti-doctrinal and seeker sensitive category), Joel Osteen (same category as Warren), and Albert Mohler, who may lead the Southern Baptist Convention away from dispensationalism and into a more Reformed viewpoint. My guess is that the Christian Right will be more or less a memory by 2020. However, absent their influence, there will be little, humanly speaking, to prevent this nation from sliding further to the political and social Left.
To: Junior
Agreed but there is no prohibition against legislating about rights not enumerated in the Constitution. Otherwise there is a "right" to everything and everything. I could list silly examples but I expect you already understand my point.
310
posted on
01/19/2006 10:07:58 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: Junior
If you really believe that atheist are only 1-2% of the population, I have a bridge in N.Y. for sale, cheap!
Perhaps that reflects the percentage that industrial religion admits to, but it is a LONG way from my own observations.
If I had to guess, I would say that atheist and agnostics probably make up about 30% of the U.S. population. Just my guess based on observation.
It could be that a LOT of people who answer "Christian" to poll's are not at all active in their professed faith, and do not make any display of it in dress or conversation.
311
posted on
01/19/2006 10:08:38 AM PST
by
Richard-SIA
("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
To: Maximus of Texas
312
posted on
01/19/2006 10:09:50 AM PST
by
PaulaB
(Shine Sweet Freedom)
To: Junior
Bagpipes coming over yon brae.
313
posted on
01/19/2006 10:11:05 AM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: rhombus
"Agreed but there is no prohibition against legislating about rights not enumerated in the Constitution."
Then the Constitution is a meaningless piece of paper. If the Constitution doesn't specifically empower the government to do something, the government has no legitimate power to do that thing. Otherwise, the government would be empowered to do anything and everything and the Constitution would have no weight at all.
314
posted on
01/19/2006 10:14:15 AM PST
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: ComtedeMaistre
To: ComtedeMaistre
Sure, but only to the extent that most "atheists" aren't really non-theists. Doubters and seekers are fine by me.
The true-believing, evangelical non-theistic contrarians who have no respect for Christians or anyone of a religious frame of mind--who equate James Dobson and Pope Benedict XVI with the Taliban--have no place in the conservative movement.
316
posted on
01/19/2006 10:15:54 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(The greatest gift parents can give their children is siblings.)
To: CarolinaGuitarman
The Constitution set up a federal system of Government. It also set up a Bill of Rights that could not be violated by legislation. It also set up a system where states could amend that Constitution. I think it's working pretty well except when people ignore it.
317
posted on
01/19/2006 10:18:15 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: Wallace T.
Albert Mohler, who may lead the Southern Baptist Convention away from dispensationalism and into a more Reformed viewpointI get the distinct impression that a Mohler reformation is less toward a new church and more toward an old church.
To: rhombus
"The Constitution set up a federal system of Government. It also set up a Bill of Rights that could not be violated by legislation. It also set up a system where states could amend that Constitution. I think it's working pretty well except when people ignore it."
Like when they ignore the fact that unenumerated government *powers* are unconstitutional?
319
posted on
01/19/2006 10:20:07 AM PST
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
320
posted on
01/19/2006 10:21:59 AM PST
by
rhombus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 401-406 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson