[WildHorseCrash]

Your distinction between science and theology, like your distinction between natural and supernatural, is arbitrary.

LOL... If you think that the distinction between science and theology is arbitrary, then there really is nothing left to discuss. Yours is a lost cause.

That is a point of view that shows ignorance as to the original intent of the authors of the Constitution.

Understanding what the current law is is in no way indicative of ignorance regarded the purported original intent of the drafters. It merely recognizes that what the law is is not always the same as what we thing the law should be.

[Fester Chugabrew]

Current law is in error to the extent it establishes nontheistic science in public schools. The Constitution does not support such a practice, but encourages freedom of religious expression both in public and in private, whether in a scientific, philosophical, or theological context. It also encourages, among other things, nontheistic science.