[Fester Chugabrew]

Current law is in error to the extent it establishes nontheistic science in public schools. The Constitution does not support such a practice, but encourages freedom of religious expression both in public and in private, whether in a scientific, philosophical, or theological context. It also encourages, among other things, nontheistic science.

[WildHorseCrash]

Current law is in error...

You are free to believe anything about what the law should be, but the law does mandate secular education. (And properly so.)

[CobaltBlue]

The Constitution does not support such a practice, but encourages freedom of religious expression both in public and in private, whether in a scientific, philosophical, or theological context. It also encourages, among other things, nontheistic science.

Your argument is interesting, but the law is well settled.

It all boils down to taxation -- public schools are funded by taxes, and we all pay them. That includes Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Hindus, etc., etc., etc.

There is nothing so galling as being forced to fund somebody else's religion. Jefferson and Madison recognized that, hence the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, and the First Amendment. In their day it was the Baptists being taxed to fund the Episcopalians.

You're free to believe whatever you want, but you can't use my tax money to proselytize your religion.