To: narby; CarolinaGuitarman
[How can science exclude something it claims to be "silent" about?] Perhaps this should go into nomination for the quote of the day award? I've already got a specimen from that particular troll:
post 428 by Fester Chugabrew on 05 Dec 2005. I maintain that science is in and of itself a supernatural occurence.
That's more than enough. For a lifetime.
250 posted on
01/19/2006 5:03:42 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
It's a well that never runs dry.
251 posted on
01/19/2006 5:04:54 PM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: PatrickHenry
I still maintain that science is in and of itself a supernatural occurence, inasmuch as it would be "natural" if the elements did not combine into purposeful assemblies; if there were, as a result, no human observers and thus no science. How is a scientific man like yourself able to so finely judge what constitutes "natural" vs. "supernatural"?
To: PatrickHenry
That's more than enough. For a lifetime. And yet you return...
334 posted on
01/20/2006 6:22:23 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson