Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our ears once breathed [evolution of ears]
Nature Magazine ^ | 18 January 2006 | Helen Pearson

Posted on 01/18/2006 6:10:34 PM PST by PatrickHenry

Our ears could have started evolutionary life as a tube for breathing, say scientists, after examining the ancestral structure in a 370-million-year-old fossil fish.

Evolutionary biologists are intrigued by how complicated sensory organs evolved from structures that may have had completely different uses in ancestral creatures. The bony structures in ancient fish, which at some point turned into ears, for example, appear to have had mainly a structural function, bracing the cheek and holding up the jaw. How exactly they made the transition to their role in hearing has proved a bit of a mystery.

The ear is a relatively easy organ to study. Its evolving bones have been preserved as fossils, whereas the soft tissues of other specialized features, such as eyes and noses, have long decayed.

So Martin Brazeau and Per Ahlberg of Uppsala University in Sweden decided to take a close look at the ear-like features of an ancient, metre-long monster from the Latvian Natural History Museum in Riga. Panderichthys was a fish, but is thought to be closely related to the earliest four-limbed tetrapods that eventually climbed on to land and gave rise to modern vertebrates.

The researchers examined Panderichthys and found that the bony structures in its head combine features of fish and tetrapods, capturing a snapshot of evolution in action. "It's neat to see that transition," says Hans Thewissen who studies the evolution of the ear and other organs at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown.

Half-way house

Ancient fish have a narrow channel from the roof of the skull into the mouth, known as a spiracle, which is bounded by a long bone known as the hyomandibula that braces the cheek. In tetrapods, the equivalent bone is stubbier, a step towards the stirrup-like stapes bone that helps to transmit sound waves into our skulls.

The team found that Panderichthys has a wide, straight spiracle rather than a narrow one, and a shortened hyomandibula. They report their findings in Nature1.

Some have previously speculated that our ancient ears may have had a role in breathing.

On the basis of this new fossil evidence, the team speculates that the widened spiracle may have served Panderichthys much like the breathing holes used by modern-day sharks and rays. These allow the fish to inhale water over their gills while lying on the seabed, and avoid gulping in grit through the mouth.

The demonstration of an organ evolving provides tangible evidence against the idea, put forward by some proponents of creationism, that sensory organs are so intricate that they must have been designed by a higher being. Brazeau says: "It's a slap in the face to that kind of thinking."


Footnote 1: Brazeau M. D.& Ahlberg P. E. Nature, 439. 318 - 321 (2006).


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; sweden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-285 next last
To: Syntyr

Just throwing it out there...

Macro Evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics. Nothing gets more complicated without external influences. We did not evolve from some ooze.

Micro evolution yes. Macro no. I leave it to your own belief system to determine how that happened.

--

Guess what! There ARE external influences on species!
One of them is an enormous nuclear generator in the sky.


221 posted on 01/19/2006 2:55:13 AM PST by TheWormster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
And you trust the PEERS? I'm glad America moved beyond the peerage. I don't need barons and squires and such--

;->

Ah a sense of humor. I didn't think you had it in you.

Fraud is rife in scientific academia.

Insanity, however, is still there ...

222 posted on 01/19/2006 2:56:33 AM PST by dread78645 (Intelligent Design. It causes people to lie - joebucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

I think that was a joke.


223 posted on 01/19/2006 2:58:47 AM PST by dread78645 (Intelligent Design. It causes people to lie - joebucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: crghill

You guys spend the rest of the evening feeling smug about how your scientific knowledge trumps my common sense. Be sure that you don't forget that your just trying to make yourselves feel better. Perhaps you could get together and write an article on how our noses used to be appendages utilized to help us swing from tree to tree!


---

Common sense, in terms of science, is usefully described as what we knew about 2 centuries ago.
Once it was common sense that heavy objects fall faster than light ones. Once it was common sense that if you drop an object from the top of a mast of a ship, it would fall behind the ship. Once it was common sense that an object needs a constant force on it to keep it moving at a constant speed. Once it was common sense that time was absolute, and moving quickly wouldnt affect the rate that time went. Once it was common sense that we could know both where something was and how fast it was going.

I will take scientific evidence over common sense any day of the week.


224 posted on 01/19/2006 2:59:12 AM PST by TheWormster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

And you trust the PEERS? I'm glad America moved beyond the peerage. I don't need barons and squires and such--
Fraud is rife in scientific academia. The stakes are high--prestige, money, status, money, careers, money, tenure, money. A scientist is just as likely as anyone else to fall to tempation.

---

Ahhh.. the money! I know that when I was in academia, you could hardly find a parking space in the biology faculty parking lot. All the spaces were taken up with Jaguars, Bentleys, Rolls Royces and the like!


225 posted on 01/19/2006 3:01:44 AM PST by TheWormster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TheWormster
Here's my take on creationists and how they promote junk science:

Me: Dinosaurs.

Creationist: La la la la la can't hear you!

Me: Neanderthals.

Creationist: La la la la la can't hear you!

Me: The X-Men mutants.

Creationist: Whoa, cool!

226 posted on 01/19/2006 3:07:53 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Deadshot Drifter

You guys spend the rest of the evening feeling smug about how your scientific knowledge trumps my common sense.
I saw no common sense in evidence from you.

--

From creationists, common sense is neither.


227 posted on 01/19/2006 3:14:05 AM PST by TheWormster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
I can't help thinking that breathing through your ears would be an advantage in oral sex ...

Okay. Everybody was biting their tongue and holding off the jokes ...

228 posted on 01/19/2006 3:19:42 AM PST by dread78645 (Intelligent Design. It causes people to lie - joebucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Junior

"Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses"

FR is badly in need of an anti-spam feature that allows one to filter out the broken record rants of people who belong in the crank.net hall of fame.


229 posted on 01/19/2006 3:20:41 AM PST by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
And for some reason all of them seem to post their ignorant rants to me.

That's why the Grand Master pays you the big bucks.

230 posted on 01/19/2006 3:23:27 AM PST by dread78645 (Intelligent Design. It causes people to lie - joebucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: crghill
Wy do you have so much of a problem with evolution? Why can't it be God's way of making things change? God and evolution are NOT exclusive. In fact, if you would actually educate your self about BOTH evolution AND Christ, you would see that the two blend together nicely. They are not trying to say "there is no God"...they are trying to figure out how God did it....quite a different tack.

Of course, from what I can see, you are so indoctrinated into the flat earth society, that all you can do is cover your ears and eyes and scream "la,la,la,la" like a little kid trying NOT to hear something they don't want to hear.

Evolution happened and continues to happen. This is a fact just like gravity is a fact (we can't "prove" gravity, we don't know WHY it works....but experimental testing and the fact that we are all still attached to the earth and are not thrown off into space due to rotational velocity is a pretty darn good indicator of its' existence). Evolution is the same way. All those fossils are not part of a great conspiracy to deny your God. Rather, think of them as small pieces to the huge puzzle God left here in order to give us little insights into his mind and his thoughts, desires, processes and goals for us. To deny this evidence, is to deny the wishes of YOUR God.

If God wanted you to hide your head in a hole in the ground and remain ignorant of his great works of creation, there would only be animals. Man was allowed to evolve from the lower animals in order for God to start educating his children - to pass along his knowledge - like most normal families do - from Adult to child - or in this case - from God to Man.

Evolution happens. Accept it and be closer to your God.

231 posted on 01/19/2006 3:43:17 AM PST by KeepUSfree (WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
Why are there still monkeys!?"

I read an article saying that several million yrs. ago, chimps (our closest relatives) lived in central Africa. A drought forced them to make major changes, remain as tree dwellers or move out into the nearly treeless savannah. The ones who chose the savannah, eventually began to walk upright, on took on more early human characteristics. This, the author states, debunks the theory of a 'missing link'. Just thought I would throw that in as food for thought. Personally, I see evolution as a tool of our Lord.
232 posted on 01/19/2006 4:18:34 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon; All
I've seen several posts from creationists complaining that the article contains expressions like "may have," "could have," "thought to be," etc. Post 184 is typical of these, although post 135 is a classic. I don't know what's bothering those folks. Would they prefer that scientists write in the divinely authoritarian style of Genesis?

But even as these "imperative vs. subjunctive" criticisms abound, presumably to point out the "weakness" of science, how many times have we seen anti-science posters complaining that evolution is being taught as fact when "it's only a theory?"

233 posted on 01/19/2006 4:25:48 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: M203M4; Ichneumon
Ignorance seems to be a strength to many, something to aspire to.

And they seem to be proud of it. (Shaking head in disbelief)

234 posted on 01/19/2006 5:21:36 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster; balrog666
There was obviously some ooze involved in the evolution of your education!

ROTFLMAO! Best line of the thread!

235 posted on 01/19/2006 5:24:20 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
It's a millionth of a be: a very small level of existance

That's good! I'm going to steal it. LOL!

236 posted on 01/19/2006 5:29:21 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle; Stultis
Whereas if a cosmologist waves his hands and murmurs soothingly about "billions and billions of years"--who can say him nay?. That's the thing about stats and their obfuscatory nature--they often reveal an accompanying condition rather than the fact they seem to reveal.

You have it backwards. We (the human race) started out thinking the universe was young until the evidence became so overwhelming that we finally had to admit it was billions of years old.

237 posted on 01/19/2006 5:37:07 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Evolution, the tool of the quasi-scientist.


238 posted on 01/19/2006 5:38:52 AM PST by conservative barking moonbat (2000 Light years from home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
"We (the human race) started out thinking the universe was young until the evidence became so overwhelming that we finally had to admit it was billions of years old."


I do not believe this is historically correct, I think the theory of a young earth got rooted about the same time as darwin's plantings.

Biblically speaking Moses, David, Solomon, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Peter and Paul and others, knew and wrote about a very very OLD earth. Peter called it the earth that WAS.
239 posted on 01/19/2006 5:44:36 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Nope. The "Young Earth" idea far preceded Darwin’s time. I cannot interpret what time span "old" means in the Bible.


240 posted on 01/19/2006 5:54:28 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson