Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last Independent Counsel Report Set For 'Release'; Focus On Clinton Administration
Drudge Report ^ | 1/15/06 | Drudge

Posted on 01/15/2006 5:22:51 PM PST by wagglebee

In Monday's edition of the NEW YORK SUN, reporter Brian McGuire and contributor R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., break the first look at the long-anticipated report from Independent Counsel David Barrett, whose investigation lasted 10 year and cost taxpayers $23 million.

The SUN outlines the report's details surrounding the alleged illicit activity and cover up that involving former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Henry Cisneros before and during his time in the Clinton Administration.

The Sun reveals that the Barrett report connects the dots that allege that senior officials of the Clinton Administration hindered investigations by the IRS in both Texas and Washington, as well as the investigations of a grand jury examining the independent counsel's evidence.

The full report, more than 400 pages line, with more than 100 pages of redacted material, hits the street on Thursday morning at 9 am.

Democrats in the House and Senate have been fighting for months to block the release of the report and keep the 100 pages of highly damaging redacted material from ever seeing the light of day.

Developing...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barrett; barrettreport; clintons; clintonscandals; davidbarrett; impeached42; independentcounsel; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: SkyPilot
What I really hope is exposed is the Clinton administration tactic of using the IRS to harass anyone who got in their way, and the manipulation of Reno's pathetic "Justice" Dept.

I think what you really mean is "officially" exposed. There's nothing here that well read conservatives out here in the hinterlands don't already know. Or practically everyone of both parties inside the beltway.

However BC will never get his just rewards in this lifetime. It's time we all acknowledged that. Our job is to stop Hillary and let God mete out justice to Bill.

A-The spineless pubbies have done their usual and "stood up to" the DIMs by grabbing their own ankles (redacting the 100 pages)
B-Even if the 100 pages were released, it would be so poo pooed by the MSM that no one that doesn't already know and believe it would take it seriously anyway.
C-For its own reasons, I believe that the Bush administration has and will put the kabosh on any serious legal action against Bill or Hillary. Why? Although I diasagree, I think they are concerned that it would boomerang and martyr-ize the Clintons.

41 posted on 01/15/2006 8:17:55 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It's time for a courageous whistleblower to come forward and share the information that's not being released to the public.


42 posted on 01/15/2006 8:19:18 PM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

This sounds like a job for Mark Levin's group..to get a FOIA paper submitted...


43 posted on 01/15/2006 8:30:51 PM PST by Txsleuth (Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth; YaYa123; Bahbah; Mo1; tiredoflaundry; saveliberty; MNJohnnie; Fudd Fan; Carolinamom; ...

ping a ling..


44 posted on 01/15/2006 8:34:46 PM PST by Txsleuth (Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RVN Airplane Driver
Funny you should post this. I sent emails to both my senators (Kay Bailey Hutchinson and John Cornyn) as well as my representative (Michael McCaul).

The funny thing is I got that same email back, word for word. From John Cornyn, over a week after I sent it. The other two did not respond. Small world. I would think the form letter/email was made for this specific purpose. Most likely our inquiry/input was not even read.
45 posted on 01/15/2006 8:35:26 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Go Tony! I hope he comes through.......

This should be very interesting!


46 posted on 01/15/2006 10:55:38 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mississippi red-neck
We spent 23 MILLION for this? OMG.........
47 posted on 01/15/2006 10:57:40 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

I hate to say this...because I am a hugh Cornyn fan...and I HAVE received snail mail that couldn't have been a form letter from him....

But, I also received that same e-mail response to my request for the release of the Barrett Report....

The good news is...there must be a LOT of people e-mailing him...if he has made a "form response"...and surely that means he will be cognizant of the report's release...and make sure that we the people get the chance to read all of it..


48 posted on 01/15/2006 11:01:04 PM PST by Txsleuth (Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mississippi red-neck

I couldn't have said it any better myself.

YOU NAILED IT.


49 posted on 01/15/2006 11:54:18 PM PST by Humidston (Two words: TERM LIMITS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mississippi red-neck

EXACTLY bump!

We must get rid of the professional politician in DC.


50 posted on 01/16/2006 2:05:01 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Shortstop7
Yep. this what happens every time we let these people in Washington investigate themselves or pick a so called independent consul to do so.

All they do is slam a lid on the boiling kettle and see that their sons,daughters,nieces and nephews etc, get a steady taxpayer paycheck for years of paper pushing.

After a while when the heat dies down and it no longer really matters, and people forget all about the scandal, then like this one ten years later they show up with nothing.

I figure this U.N. oil scandal ought to be good for a number of years and a hundred million or so.

Watch what doesn't happen and how much it costs .

No proof, no jail time, no money recovered, no names for certain, looks like even no job loss for Annan just billions gone and dead Iraqi children from no medicine and American soldiers from the arms sold to Saddam.

51 posted on 01/16/2006 2:31:54 AM PST by mississippi red-neck (You will never win the war on terrorism by fighting it in Iraq and funding it in the West Bank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Barrett report ping.


52 posted on 01/16/2006 2:56:12 AM PST by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

:-( Edited report, it would seem


53 posted on 01/16/2006 4:07:32 AM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

With 1/4 of it being redacted, it's probably useless.


54 posted on 01/16/2006 4:12:37 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Bet no one leaks those 100 pages of juicy material to the NYT or Newsweak. They want to live.


55 posted on 01/16/2006 4:15:06 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

If Cornyn had a form letter, that implies the need for one. There must be a lot of us writing in. Kay will usually send a response - by snail mail - several weeks later.


56 posted on 01/16/2006 4:21:37 AM PST by mathluv (Bushbot, Snowflake, Dittohead ---- Bring it on!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Weren't the redactions ordered by a judge?


57 posted on 01/16/2006 4:23:15 AM PST by mathluv (Bushbot, Snowflake, Dittohead ---- Bring it on!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mathluv
Truthfully, I can't say. I just remember reading several weeks ago something to the effect that invertebrate pubbies had delayed the release in some sort of "grab your ankles" deal with the DIMs, and that they were making an arrangement to omit a sizable portion of the report from the release. So, my assumption was that the pubbies are responsible. As is usually the case when some sort of capitulation is involved.
58 posted on 01/16/2006 5:44:58 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

I either read that on here, or heard it on Tony's show, or Rush's.


59 posted on 01/16/2006 5:48:12 AM PST by mathluv (Bushbot, Snowflake, Dittohead ---- Bring it on!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson