Posted on 01/01/2006 10:22:42 PM PST by presidio9
Arizona senator John McCain could win the 2008 presidential election in the United States, according to a poll by Zogby International. 52 per cent of respondents would vote for the Republican in a head-to-head contest against Democratic New York senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
In 2000, McCain won seven GOP presidential primaries in the U.S., but retired from the race after eventual nominee George W. Bush became the frontrunner.
Rodham Clinton was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2000, defeating Republican Rick Lazio by 12 per cent. She ruled out a presidential bid in 2004. 37 per cent of respondents would vote for the Democrat, while 11 per cent would back other candidates or remain undecided.
Bush is ineligible for a third term in office. The next presidential election is scheduled for November 2008.
Polling Data
Who would you vote for in a presidential election pitting Republican John McCain versus Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton?
John McCain (R) 52%
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) 37%
Not sure / Other 11%
Not pissy. I would feel like a hypocrite criticizing the NYT if I couldn't find any other source than Newsmax to back me up. Newsmax is not credible.
Would you vote for the devil herself, or would you rather take what's behind door number two?
What horsecrap. I seriously hope the Republican Party isn't being swayed by this garbage and finds a better candidate than McCain.
And the NYT is? You are being pissy!
John McCain attracts legion of admirers to book-signing
snip
McCain ducked questions about his plans for 2008. But "Character" could have been dubbed "Profiles in Courage" if that title hadn't adorned a 1955 book by another ambitious U.S. senator: John F. Kennedy.
E.J. Dionne, a Washington Post columnist, recently analyzed how these chapters would play in a future McCain campaign. Turns out, there's something for every voter.
http://tinyurl.com/cv66c
Of course the NYT is not. Did you read what I wrote? Or is "pissy" the first word on your 2006 vocabulary calander?
Thats not going to happen with Giuliani in the race.
The next POTUS will be Giuliani.
I would vote for the pro-life, pro-family McCain over the pro-abortion, pro-gay Giuliani in a primary. No question.
No. "Calander" is. You are the one who equated Newsmax to "Weekly World News."
Sorry, 'Bob!
I must agree. The issue referenced is right in front of me and as Groucho said are you going to believe "your lyin' eyes?" Yes.
;)
I just checked the internet. It's chock full of conservative news sources that are more reliable than Newsmax. If you're too lazy to find one, you probably don't have anything enlightening enough to say anyway.
The device has yet to be invented that can measure my indifference to that remark.
But then you enjoy reading Newsmax, so I'll just bet that you're indifferent to lots of stimuli.
Just the stupid postings of narrow-minded yankees.
You mean, like the baseball team? You making less and less sense (if that's possible). Maybe you should call it a day.
There he goes. Gettin' all pissy again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.