Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Department going after leakers! - Fox News
Fox News

Posted on 12/30/2005 7:26:42 AM PST by Pukin Dog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,221-1,225 next last
To: Yasotay
against unreasonable searches and seizures

key phrase...who decides what is unreasonable?

881 posted on 12/30/2005 1:48:58 PM PST by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

JRock goin' down index bump


882 posted on 12/30/2005 1:49:08 PM PST by txhurl (hook'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

That's an explosive story. Is Lamberth still chief judge in the FISA court?


883 posted on 12/30/2005 1:50:28 PM PST by defenderSD (¤¤ In a battle of wits against a FReeper, the typical liberal is unarmed. ¤¤)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
The Left is in pure panic mode today. They didnt think the Administration had the balls. Now, a few people are going to go to jail, and notice will be served to the rest of these traitors that leaking has consequences.

Like I said before, they already know who did it, and are probably just cleaning up the investigation before indictments are announced. The Libs will be screaming bloody murder this Sunday, saying its just a distraction and other nonsense. They cant escape, we've got the bastards.

884 posted on 12/30/2005 1:51:31 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

OMG!!! The enemy has infiltrated deep into our government!

No wonder things keep getting covered up!


885 posted on 12/30/2005 1:51:44 PM PST by airborne (If being a Christian was a crime, would there be enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

bookmark


886 posted on 12/30/2005 1:52:21 PM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
The dems will circle the wagons, the press will cover them and turn it all back on Bush

Come on Freepers, this is an issue we should win on every time. Let's not let them turn this back on us, even though that's exactly what they will try to do.

I personally won't rest until we see at minimum a public, detailed report on these charges.

887 posted on 12/30/2005 1:53:03 PM PST by lawnguy (Give me some of your tots!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
 
 
Hmmm! Looks like the DOJ is on the target.
 
 
 

888 posted on 12/30/2005 1:54:34 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

"I love the keywords at the top of this thread! Keep them coming, you crazy but lovable FReepers!"

Traitortots was my contribution..(grin)


889 posted on 12/30/2005 1:55:34 PM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
"Eco-Terrorists"

yeah....some folks just can't take their ball and go home....

890 posted on 12/30/2005 1:56:21 PM PST by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Peach's thread

Disorder in the Court (FISA)

891 posted on 12/30/2005 1:58:04 PM PST by txhurl (hook'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64

bookmark


892 posted on 12/30/2005 1:59:45 PM PST by Chuck54 (Free Scooter, Indict Joe W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 890 | View Replies]

To: lawnguy; UCANSEE2
"The dems will circle the wagons, the press will cover them and turn it all back on Bush."

I disagree with your take on this, because this is not a winning issue for most Dem politicians. Sure, the crazed San Francisco lefties will attack Bush for the investigation of this leak, but Dem congressmen in New Jersey, New York and in the midwest won't say much about this investigation. They will completely avoid this issue or give the investigation some mild support. Unbiased polls show strong support for NSA surveillance of terrorism suspects, and smart politicians pay attention to unbiased polls.

893 posted on 12/30/2005 2:00:56 PM PST by defenderSD (¤¤ In a battle of wits against a FReeper, the typical liberal is unarmed. ¤¤)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: lawnguy
Relax, we wont lose this one. This investigation probably started the day the Administration asked the Times not to run with the article, which is over a year ago.

Bush kept silent through all the crap spewing from the media, who probably thought nothing would happen when they ran with the article, since they knew nothing of the leak investigation.

You don't make this kind of announcement BEFORE the investigation, that would give the guilty a chance to cover themselves. You make the announcement when you've got someone dead to rights, and you drag them in to see if they want to talk and name more names before you drop the hammer on them.

894 posted on 12/30/2005 2:01:09 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

The list of the people privy to the leaked info should be pretty short.


895 posted on 12/30/2005 2:02:13 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Anyone who does not have a security clearance on a matter is pretty much free to speculate. The only way to keep someone from blabbing is to give him the level of security and brief him on the matter. But, someone somewhere seems to have got the info, and that person might have not had the proper clearance. This is possible when those with clearance do not exercise their obligations, especially by insufficiently guarding classified documents, and in this case they await the knock on the door.


896 posted on 12/30/2005 2:02:25 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

"The leakers have compromised national security and should be brought to justice."

You're right, we are at war...compromising national security's justice is before a firing squad.


897 posted on 12/30/2005 2:03:42 PM PST by tillacum (HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: txflake

I was just over on another site they said Daily Kos is melting down..


898 posted on 12/30/2005 2:04:36 PM PST by Dog ( ABMcM(Anybody but McCain....except Bill Frist))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 882 | View Replies]

To: Democracy In Iraq
that would make a hell of a bumper sticker- LOL!
899 posted on 12/30/2005 2:05:42 PM PST by Charlespg (Civilization and freedom are only worthy of those who defend or support defending It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac

I wonder if we'll be 'at war' when a Democrat does this and if the ardent cheerleaders of government intrusion will be as supportive for reporting on questionable, at best, power grabs.


900 posted on 12/30/2005 2:06:48 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,221-1,225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson