Posted on 12/22/2005 5:45:27 AM PST by churchillbuff
SEATTLE "The Dover decision is an attempt by an activist federal judge to stop the spread of a scientific idea and even to prevent criticism of Darwinian evolution through government-imposed censorship rather than open debate, and it won't work," said Dr. John West, Associate Director of the Center for Science and Culture at Discovery Institute, the nation's leading think tank researching the scientific theory known as intelligent design. He has conflated Discovery Institutes position with that of the Dover school board, and he totally misrepresents intelligent design and the motivations of the scientists who research it.
A legal ruling can't change the fact that there is digital code in DNA, it cant remove the molecular machines from the cell, nor change the fine tuning of the laws of physics, added West. The empirical evidence for design, the facts of biology and nature, can't be changed by legal decree."
In his decision, Judge John Jones ruled that the Dover, Pennsylvania school district violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by requiring a statement to be read to students notifying them about intelligent design. Reaching well beyond the immediate legal questions before him, Judge Jones offered wide-ranging and sometimes angry comments denouncing intelligent design and praising Darwinian evolution.
"Judge Jones found that the Dover board violated the Establishment Clause because it acted from religious motives. That should have been the end to the case," said West. "Instead, Judge Jones got on his soapbox to offer his own views of science, religion, and evolution. He makes it clear that he wants his place in history as the judge who issued a definitive decision about intelligent design. This is an activist judge who has delusions of grandeur."
"Anyone who thinks a court ruling is going to kill off interest in intelligent design is living in another world," continued West. "Americans don't like to be told there is some idea that they aren't permitted to learn about.. It used to be said that banning a book in Boston guaranteed it would be a bestseller. Banning intelligent design in Dover will likely only fan interest in the theory."
"In the larger debate over intelligent design, this decision will be of minor significance," added Discovery Institute attorney Casey Luskin. "As we've repeatedly stressed, the ultimate validity of intelligent design will be determined not by the courts but by the scientific evidence pointing to design.
Luskin pointed out that the ruling only applies to the federal district in which it was handed down. It has no legal effect anywhere else. The decision is also unlikely to be appealed, since the recently elected Dover school board members campaigned on their opposition to the policy. "The plans of the lawyers on both sides of this case to turn this into a landmark ruling have been preempted by the voters," he said.
"Discovery Institute continues to oppose efforts to mandate teaching about the theory of intelligent design in public schools," emphasized West. "But the Institute strongly supports the freedom of teachers to discuss intelligent design in an objective manner on a voluntary basis. We also think students should learn about both the scientific strengths and weaknesses of Darwin's theory of evolution."
Drawing on recent discoveries in physics, biochemistry and related disciplines, the scientific theory of intelligent design proposes that some features of the natural world are best explained as the product of an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. Proponents include scientists at numerous universities and science organizations around the world.
Pong
In the long run it may be the best thing for ID. It has gotten a lot of attention and people are curious. It may also drive more parents to home school, which is always a good thing.
Been posted twice already, sorry.
"Is the Theory of Evolution really so fragile as to be so threatened by the teaching of alternate viewpoints that it must now be protected by law???"
Yes.
ditto
Any good URLs for Intelligent Design? I keep finding fake ones which seen designed for debunking it.
It would appear so - otherwise why the terror over having it on the table?
When our great country was beginning, we started the American Philosophical Society. SCIENCE should not LIMIT thinking.
No, the proponents of ID are so ignorant that they have decided that ther very definition of science must be changed to include the supernatural. This isn't so much about evolution, but about keeping the uneducated and uninformed from deciding matters they know nothing about.
>>>When our great country was beginning, we started the American Philosophical Society. SCIENCE should not LIMIT thinking.
Intelligent Design is not science. It generates no testable hypotheses and otherwise does not conform with the scientific method. This does not mean ID is not true. It simply means that the existence of an intelligent designer is not a question that science can address.
In some ways, science does limit thinking because a scientific theory must fit the observed facts. ID has no observed facts to support it, therefore cannot be considered inside the realm of science. Science is not the realm of free thinking. If you want that, hang out in a local coffee shop or take some classes in philosophy.
looks like a rehash of other threads...
Evo's wont tolerate any tolerance for discussion bookmark.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.