Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Accepts McCain's Ban on Torture
Drudge Report ^ | Dec 15, 2005 | LIZ SIDOTI

Posted on 12/15/2005 4:08:10 PM PST by armydawg1

WASHINGTON - President Bush reversed course on Thursday and accepted Sen. John McCain's call for a law banning cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of foreign suspects in the war on terror. Bush said the agreement will "make it clear to the world that this government does not torture and that we adhere to the international convention of torture, whether it be here at home or abroad."

"It's a done deal," said McCain, talking to reporters in a driving rain outside the White House.

Under the deal, CIA interrogators would be given the same legal rights as currently guaranteed members of the military who are accused of breaking interrogation guidelines. Those rules say the accused can defend themselves by arguing it was reasonable for them to believe they were obeying a legal order.

"We've sent a message to the world that the United States is not like the terrorists," McCain said earlier as he sat next to Bush in the Oval Office.

The White House at one point threatened a veto if the ban was included in legislation sent to the president's desk, and Vice President Dick Cheney made an unusual personal appeal to all Republican senators to give an exemption to the CIA. www.drudgereport.com

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 109th; bush43; mccain; torture; torturebill; vetolaughinghere
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Howlin
You want to know how he sustains a veto? I'll tell you how.

Right now over 60 % of Americans disagree with John McCain. The President has a live press conference and tells the American people that what John McCain wants is for marines and grunts in the field to have to mirandize terrorist scum. That is what this legislation does, it grants 5th and 14th amendment protections to unlawful combatants. Hell, it might not even be legal to kill them any more unless they shoot first when the courts get done interpreting this garbage.

That's how, he straps on a pair and takes a dman stand.

I've been a supporter of his through thick and thin but now I've about had it. When he endangers soldiers, intel guys and American security for political expedience, I'm done with him.

21 posted on 12/15/2005 4:36:10 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

One can only hope that Bush cut some sort of back-room deal here, and that McCain has agreed not to call the Gang of 14 into action to derail the Alito nomination. However, I am not holding my breath.


22 posted on 12/15/2005 4:40:57 PM PST by Zetman (This secret to simple and inexpensive cold fusion intentionally left blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1
Yeah, BIG wussy.

Remember his father's battle with the "Wimp Factor"?

Like father, like son.

23 posted on 12/15/2005 4:43:55 PM PST by xrp (Conservative votes are to Republicans what 90% of black votes are to Democrats (taken for granted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

I think this is worse than the usual leftist grandstanding. The heart of this is to redefine the word "torture" until it means anything and everything. That is the key to everything that will follow. The first thing you will hear is that terrorists can no longer be handed to friendly countries for questioning. Finally, apprehending terrorists at all will be redefined as being "torture," and thus illegal.


24 posted on 12/15/2005 4:44:38 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

This is a stupid law. It is going to come back
and haunt those who brought it into being, the
same way the sh*t laws about not allowing
intelligence agencies to share information
came back to haunt us with the attacks on 9/11.

Oh God..Please help me to understand how they
can be so mentally myopic, and how i can make
them see the awful consequences of their feel good
ostrichism.


25 posted on 12/15/2005 4:49:45 PM PST by Baby Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

You're so right! Apparently Bush has never read Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution. Mark Levin referred to this sell-out as the "Al Qaeda Bill of Rights". I guess now captured terrorists will get ACLU lawyers when they're "tortured" by being deprived of some sleep.


26 posted on 12/15/2005 4:51:21 PM PST by T.L.Sink (stopew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1
What a sweet deal for the terrorists.

How do I surrender to these idiot politicians ?
27 posted on 12/15/2005 4:53:00 PM PST by oldbrowser (Release the Barrett Report)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

If I were Dick Cheney I would resign over this.


28 posted on 12/15/2005 4:53:25 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

Well I guess we can finally put to rest all that "Bush belongs on Mt. Rushmore" talk. He had a chance, but failed to rise to Reagan's level. There's just too much that is adding up to too many missed opportunities.


29 posted on 12/15/2005 4:56:39 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1
(donning flame-retardent underwear)

FlipFlopFlipFlopFlipFlopFlipFlopFlipFlop

30 posted on 12/15/2005 4:57:39 PM PST by manwiththehands ("Have a RamaHanuKwanzMas" - Glenn Beck (And Merry Christmas!) (... and "Happy Holidays!"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: armydawg1

I'll say it: Bush is an idiot for doing this.


32 posted on 12/15/2005 5:09:23 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtp7

Here's one Catholic that is NOT a fan of John McCain .


33 posted on 12/15/2005 5:11:37 PM PST by Bishop_Malachi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Succinct comment.

I wonder if someone hides the President's veto pen from him? Is he allergic to the word, "No"? What's up with that? Popularity vs. consistency?


34 posted on 12/15/2005 5:11:41 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1
The poster above has it right. People are going to die because of this. American soldiers are going to be put in prison because of this. Why? Because Little Johnny McCain and his Commie pals are afraid that the Frogs and the Belgians don't like us and think we are "meanies." I am a conservative and a Republican. If McCain is the GOP's presidential nominee, I will not be at the polls in 2008. I will also work hard to talk others into staying away also. This is a promise.

An Arizonan that is fed up with McCain.

35 posted on 12/15/2005 5:28:45 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtp7

I don't know what you mean by "catholics like McCain". Not only he not catholic but he was elected in Arizona last time with 77% of the vote -- so apparently all sorts of people like him.


36 posted on 12/15/2005 5:53:05 PM PST by T.L.Sink (stopew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

What can you say?? We just got sold down the river.

The President wasnt satisfied signing the Unconstitutional Campaign reform Bill, Now he has to give Terrorists Constitutional rights.

This is very dissappointing.


37 posted on 12/15/2005 5:56:25 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

"He had a chance, but failed to rise to Reagan's level."

Exactly right, "Squat." Very well put.


38 posted on 12/15/2005 6:02:55 PM PST by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

I am not entirely sure on that. Just think how much we are going to save on the war on terror now that we are no longer taking prisoners. I mean if we cannot interrogate prisoners what do we need them for?


39 posted on 12/15/2005 6:03:24 PM PST by colchicine (Friends are just enemies who don't have the guts to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1
Its time to think about taking Mcjackass's medals away from him, Thanks for endangering American lives You treasonable POS

Ps to Bush,grow some balls

40 posted on 12/15/2005 6:12:31 PM PST by Charlespg (Civilization and freedom are only worthy of those who defend or support defending It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson