Skip to comments.
'Fossil fuel' theory takes hit with NASA finding
worldnetdaily ^
| December 1, 2005
Posted on 12/02/2005 7:00:55 PM PST by seastay
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
1
posted on
12/02/2005 7:00:56 PM PST
by
seastay
To: seastay
This is good news. It means oil is a renewable resource.
I'll keep checking my back 40.
2
posted on
12/02/2005 7:07:14 PM PST
by
Candor7
(Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
To: seastay
maybe they will find aliens eating in taquerias on Titan, that would explain the methane
To: seastay
So what will the greens whine about when they learn that we don't have to conserve petroleum? Will we drill in ANWR? Enquiring minds want to know!
4
posted on
12/02/2005 7:08:06 PM PST
by
GW and Twins Pawpaw
(Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
To: seastay
"If petroleum and natural gas are abiotic as we maintain in 'Black Gold Stranglehold,'" Corsi commented, "then the 'peak oil' fear that we are going to run out of oil may have been based on a giant misconception." Peak oil is based on what is actually getting pumped out of the ground. Whether it was from dead dinos, or crushed rocks, the sobering realities are that the current most productive oil fields are the ones discovered in the 50s or earlier. Oklahoma and Indonesia fields have already past their peak production.
5
posted on
12/02/2005 7:08:30 PM PST
by
razorgirl
To: seastay
The University of New Hampshire has an interesting program in which they propose to grow oil-producing algae. They say it could provide up to 10% of the nation's oil needs:
http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.html
Kinda puts a kink in the "oil-is-a-finite-resource" mantra.
6
posted on
12/02/2005 7:10:16 PM PST
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: razorgirl
well there is plenty on titan!
7
posted on
12/02/2005 7:11:56 PM PST
by
seastay
To: randog
Kinda puts a kink in the "oil-is-a-finite-resource" mantra. Only if you insist on it being produced the old-fashioned way... 50-year-old scotch and 50M-year-old oil.
However if you could grow it in your bathtub, that would be very cool... something I'm sure the oil companies will try to stop..
8
posted on
12/02/2005 7:13:15 PM PST
by
razorgirl
To: seastay
well there is plenty on titan! All we have to do is burn up all the remaining oil getting it over here...
9
posted on
12/02/2005 7:14:24 PM PST
by
razorgirl
To: seastay
I thought it was long known that Titian had methane. Isn't it frozen?
To: Candor7
This is good news. It means oil is a renewable resource. No it doesn't. On the contrary, it indicates that oil isn't a renewable resource. No one has suggested a method for rapid oil formation --- without question we are burning it much faster than it is being created, if indeed it is being created.
11
posted on
12/02/2005 7:15:27 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: razorgirl
Rockets don't use petroleum...
12
posted on
12/02/2005 7:16:42 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: seastay
We can't drill on Titan! It might have life forms that we might disrupt! Or beautiful methane seas that some movie star might want to build a mansion next to...or...
13
posted on
12/02/2005 7:17:05 PM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
To: seastay
And how do methyl hydrates, which just sit on the bottom of the ocean, fit into this picture?
14
posted on
12/02/2005 7:21:22 PM PST
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: Alter Kaker
We may be burning it faster than it is being created, but that does not rule out oil being renewable. That just means it is being replaced slower than we are using it. Renewable, yes. Inexhaustable, no.
15
posted on
12/02/2005 7:23:15 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com)
To: seastay
Calling it fossil fuel always has sounded like a fairy tale fabricated by idiots.
16
posted on
12/02/2005 7:24:15 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Okay, bring our troops home. But don't feign suprise when the terrorists tag along.)
To: seastay
If oil is geological in nature rather than biological in nature, then perhaps oil can be found almost anywhere, providing a deep enough well is used.
I believe some fields that seemed to be "tapped out" have later been found to have "re-filled". Whether that means oil is a renewable resource may be debatable. But it seems to me that the supply of oil available to us on earth may be several orders of magnitude greater than we think.
To: Dog Gone
Well it isn't Gold's theory.
To: Candor7
studies showing abundant methane of a non-biologic nature Yeah, this was suggested and pointed out during the Titan/Saturn threads when the probe was dropped.
To: seastay
There are indeed non biological sources of hydrocarbons. However, all the hydrocarbon traps in the earth are associated with sedimentary deposition. The oil we produce is from biological sources. When they start pumping oil from one of the Pacific volcanic islands call me, and bring a dead crow for me to eat.
20
posted on
12/02/2005 7:29:52 PM PST
by
cpdiii
(roughneck (oil field trash and proud off it), geologist, pilot, pharmacist, full time iconoclast)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson