Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Alex Marko
Good thing Canada isn't participating in the War on Terror. They might be targets otherwise.
2 posted on
12/02/2005 12:57:13 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(Dems Cut and Run on their own ideas!)
To: Alex Marko
To: Alex Marko
I am shocked! ...Canada actually has armored vehicles and missiles?
4 posted on
12/02/2005 12:58:02 PM PST by
Gator101
To: Alex Marko
"I don't understand a word you just said"
5 posted on
12/02/2005 12:59:06 PM PST by
Williams
To: Alex Marko
Canadian terrorists are stupid.
6 posted on
12/02/2005 1:00:32 PM PST by
Termite_Commander
(Warning: Cynical Right-winger Ahead)
To: Alex Marko
A spokeswoman for the Department of National Defence says the army is investigating.Investigating what? Whether they actually own anti-aircraft missles?
7 posted on
12/02/2005 1:00:39 PM PST by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: Alex Marko
OMG, the questions this bring forth. All I can say is what the h@!! ?????
8 posted on
12/02/2005 1:02:21 PM PST by
tioga
To: Alex Marko
Well at least they weren't handguns.
9 posted on
12/02/2005 1:05:15 PM PST by
Brilliant
To: Alex Marko
To: Alex Marko
12 posted on
12/02/2005 1:06:08 PM PST by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: Alex Marko
westbound on Highway 407 near Toronto.[ ... ] supposed to be delivered to Montreal on Thursday. You can't get from Toronto to Montreal by going west.
15 posted on
12/02/2005 1:07:50 PM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Alex Marko
"...and loaded with anti-aircraft missile launchers."Yeah, but were there any missiles in the launchers? I can't believe live munitions would be traveling around without security, even in Canada. Something's not right with this story. Sensationalist.
To: Alex Marko
Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry???
Seems like it's a little late for a don't ask - don't tell policy up there.
18 posted on
12/02/2005 1:08:58 PM PST by
Klatuu
To: Alex Marko
"a tractor-trailer loaded with anti-aircraft missile launchers "
Just a confused driver, no escort? Sure!!!!!
19 posted on
12/02/2005 1:11:35 PM PST by
AmeriBrit
(DEMOCRATS LIE AND OUR TROOPS DIE!)
To: Alex Marko
"We should invade Canada....and their beer sucks!"
20 posted on
12/02/2005 1:11:52 PM PST by
Mat_Helm
To: Alex Marko
Is the driver a Canadian liberal?
21 posted on
12/02/2005 1:13:27 PM PST by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: Alex Marko
22 posted on
12/02/2005 1:14:26 PM PST by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: Alex Marko
I suspect that, if the launchers must be mounted on armored personnel carriers, the missiles they launch are probably fairly large munitions that are stored and transported separately.
While very dangerous, they are not the terrorists' weapon of choice. Those would be manportable air defense systems (MANPADS) like Redeye (obsolete), Stinger, Blowpipe, SA-7/18, etc.
24 posted on
12/02/2005 1:18:08 PM PST by
Captain Rhino
(If you will just abandon logic, these things will make a lot more sense!)
To: Alex Marko
Loaded with bottle rockets, and center fuel tanks.
35 posted on
12/02/2005 1:39:01 PM PST by
MonroeDNA
(Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
To: prairiebreeze; Mo1
36 posted on
12/02/2005 1:39:30 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
