To: MarcusTulliusCicero
No, read the indictment.
Well, Joseph diGenova was just on with Brit Hume saying the exact same thing I did. He said Fitzgerald has a duty under DOJ rules to go back and "recalibrate" all the indictments because their "underpinning" is destroyed with the Woodward revelation.
We shall see soon enough.
154 posted on
11/16/2005 3:15:49 PM PST by
msnimje
("People for the American Way have issued a Fatwah against Alito" --- John Cornyn)
To: msnimje
"Well, Joseph diGenova was just on with Brit Hume saying the exact same thing I did. He said Fitzgerald has a duty under DOJ rules to go back and "recalibrate" all the indictments because their "underpinning" is destroyed with the Woodward revelation."
AMEN!
And Joe diGenova also stated that Fitz will have to drop the charges against Libby!
HOOOOOORAAAAAAAAY!
157 posted on
11/16/2005 3:18:07 PM PST by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: msnimje
I watched Brit's report and came on FR thinking the place would be BUZZING with excitement - sounds like the entire case against Libby is crumbling today - and all I can find is this somewhat muted "Pincus" thread . . . odd . . .
To: msnimje
Well, Joseph diGenova was just on with Brit Hume saying the exact same thing I did. He said Fitzgerald has a duty under DOJ rules to go back and "recalibrate" all the indictments because their "underpinning" is destroyed with the Woodward revelation. No doubt he has that duty
The question is does he have the ethics ?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson