Posted on 11/14/2005 7:16:56 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
SENATE REPUBLICANS PUSH FOR PLAN ON ENDING WAR
So did the victims of the WTC, the Pentagon and Flight 93.
We need more freedom at home - - that should be the top priority for a conservative president.
That should include freedom from fear of attack.
WARD Churchillbuff!!! Get used to it MF it is going to stick.
As Bush has admitted, Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
Very Churchill-like. Finished yet? This is another spectacularly dumb move by the senate, if true. Bush is the commander in chief. He should not be pressured into leaving before he is ready to leave. Committees don't end wars. Armies do. Anything else leads to more conflicts later on.
Getting used to juvenile name-calling isn't hard. You just have to consider the source - - and realize that it's a validation of one's position, because it shows that the name-callers can't offer intelligent counter-arguments.
YES are you watchin this??!! int returned for the TD by dallas
dallas 21 phil 20 a little over 2 mins to go!!!!
Your sycophantic comments are strangely like Dem talking points. The facts simply aren't on your side. You think if you repeat that crap it means you've won the argument.
Just because a poster wants to see the terrorist supporting regimes of Syria and Iran militarily removed, doesn't mean that they don't want war to end. As I said before, it's a straw-man fallacy to assume such.
BTW, this is a war and not only that, this is a declared war and not only that, this is a constitutionally declared war.
A "police action" is a talking point straight from the 60's left. Nowadays, it's a Ron Paul talking point.
You either refuse to or are incapable of seeing the larger picture.
Good at disinformation aren't you?
Have the Chinese or the Africans attacked us here? The Chinese have threatened to of course, but for them deterrence seems to be working, at least insofar as nuking us goes anyway.
Meanwhile folks from the Middle East have attacked us, many times, both here and overseas. The best way to get rid of those particular gators is to drain the swamp. Iraq is a part that swamp.
Sometimes people name call because they get tired dealing with juvenile arguments.
No it isn't
Nope, you "strike" no never at all. We all know that you are an anti-war, ant-Bush, anti-miitary poster, who posts thread after thread of badmouthing news and posts replies that any DUer would be envious of.
"Shallow thinking"? That's not even grammatically good English; not to mention it being senseless.
"Folks like you" are devoid of comprehension, which is why so many of your posts are just DNC talking points. It's so much easier to babble the same old slogans, than to even try to think.
I ask again, what are the first three Presidential Orders you would give if you were now Commander-in-Chief that would start to solve the problem of Iraq as you see it?
If you are persuasive, you might get your way. So let's hear your ideas.
No, and neither did Iraq. Most of the 9-11 folks were Saudis. Bush has admitted that Iraq wasn't behind 9-11. The 9-11 commission also said Iraq wasn't behind 9-11.
No it isn't
Yes it is.
They're down to scary looking women relatives of "high officials" in al quada.
But, Iran is sounding like Japan in the 40's. We're not going anywhere.
Please reply and tell me what "name" I called you. I did not call you a "name".
If you think I did, you need to do two things.
#1. Check out the nearest Lenscrafters near you as they are having a sale.
#2. At your earliest possible convienience, I suggest that you engage in an autonomous act of extreme physical intimacy that some might consider physiologically impossible.
And sometimes they're just juveniles. This is one of those times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.