Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: doug from upland
Great Stuff, Doug! :) Yahoo!
2 posted on
11/09/2005 4:56:09 PM PST by
Alia
To: doug from upland
public employee unions give campaign contributions directly to those politicans with whom they negotiate their contracts and who vote for the contracts. This is a direct and inherent conflict of interest. It should be prohibited.
3 posted on
11/09/2005 4:57:18 PM PST by
bigsigh
To: doug from upland
First step...
Crack the egg.
Start noting how many teachers are being caught in sexual relations with children. Note how well it worked against the Catholic Church. But in the case of education, you can read articles almost daily of another teacher, be male or female, being caught taking advantage of a minor.
Thats how you begin to crack that egg.
Use the truth.
4 posted on
11/09/2005 4:59:43 PM PST by
baystaterebel
(http://omphalosgazer.blogspot.com/)
To: doug from upland
To: doug from upland
These unions are clearly a subsidiary of the DemocRATic Party,I disagree. The dems are a wholly owned subsidiary of the public employee's unions.
To: doug from upland
Doug, Got your northern flank covered.
9 posted on
11/09/2005 5:11:20 PM PST by
TaMoDee
To: doug from upland
"Proposition 75 was defeated yesterday in California. The teachers union spent over a hundred million dollars to defeat it.And this money, I am sure, came right out of teachers pockets!
10 posted on
11/09/2005 5:30:13 PM PST by
TheLion
To: All
Evergreen Freedom Foundation is very excited about being FR's partner in this venture. There are some favorable court decisions that are on our side. Now is the time to strike because of so many angry teachers who had money stolen from them to fight a proposition with which they agreed.
11 posted on
11/09/2005 5:30:57 PM PST by
doug from upland
("Susan Estrich...get off your kneepads" - Juanita Broaddrick)
To: doug from upland
Honest question, I have never worked for a union company and was wondering if you Had to be a teacher to join? Do members get an opportunity to vote on union issues? If so, Why couldn't conservatives pack the membership and affect the direction of union issues?
15 posted on
11/09/2005 5:38:47 PM PST by
Boiling point
(If God had not meant for man to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat!)
To: doug from upland
WAR with teachers Unions.?...
Abosultely NOBODY can whine like a teacher..
They can reduce you to tears in their whinings..
They can whine your wallet right out of you're back pocket..
It an amazing sight to behold..
16 posted on
11/09/2005 5:48:36 PM PST by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: doug from upland
If succeeding threads ---- should be In succeeding threads...
17 posted on
11/09/2005 5:55:51 PM PST by
doug from upland
("Susan Estrich...get off your kneepads" - Juanita Broaddrick)
To: doug from upland
The main reason teachers join the union is for the legal insurance. Teachers fear being sued by parents. When the union rep comes to talk to the faculty at the beginning of the year, that is the main talking point. 'Our lawyers are at your disposal.' 'We will back you in court.' In some states teachers can buy their own liability insurance as a rider on their homeowners policy - for a very few dollars a year. In one state I was told by my insurance agent, "We don't sell liability insurance to our public school teachers. We have an unwritten agreement with the union."
19 posted on
11/09/2005 5:58:51 PM PST by
abclily
To: EdReform
We've spoken about this before, my friend. With angry California teachers, maybe now the time is right.
20 posted on
11/09/2005 5:59:00 PM PST by
doug from upland
("Susan Estrich...get off your kneepads" - Juanita Broaddrick)
To: doug from upland
With the religious exemption, ALL OF THEIR DUES will go to a charity. I wasn't aware of this. Spread the word!
I also can't overstate the benefits of homeschooling. Besides the religious, academic and emotional benefits, homeschooling takes money away from the unions.
27 posted on
11/10/2005 4:49:57 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: doug from upland
29 posted on
11/10/2005 4:54:19 AM PST by
Puddleglum
(Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
To: doug from upland
Doug,
The solution is to abolish government's involvement in K-12 schooling.
The following link explains why government schooling is unconstitutional on both the federal and state levels:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter9.htm
What follows are a few talking points on why I believe government schools are unconstitutional:
Government schools curriculum and policies can NEVER be politically, culturally, or religiously neutral in content or consequences. NEVER. Why? Because childhood education is fundamentally in its very essence the transfer of values from one generation to another.
When a child attends a government school they are taught that the government can and does restrict their free speech, free press, free expression of religion, and free assembly.
Government indoctrinated children also learn that if they refuse to cooperate, government can and DOES send out armed police to force them into centers that restrict their human rights,
Government indoctrinated children also learn that if a citizen refuses to pay for government school human rights abuses, or if the citizen refuses to fund the non-neutral government school political, religious and cultural worldview that armed police can and WILL sell the citizen's home or business at auction. They also are taught that if the citizen resists, he risks prison or death.
Since it is culture, political and religious worldview, and moral and value beliefs that determines curriculum and hundreds of school policies, children learn that government can aim a police gun at them and taxpayers to FORCE the government bureaucrats' worldview on other people's children.
Children also learn in government schools that the biggest political bully gets to decide what is stuffed into the heads of the next generation of voters, judges, lawyers, professionals of all kinds, religious leaders, editors and journalists, university professors, political party leaders, and our government representatives and bureaucrats.
Question: How can any of this be constitutional?
Solution:Remove your child from government school. Privatize universal education.
To: doug from upland
I just checked out the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. Regarding education they are merely committed to imposing their worldview ( by means of government police threat) on other people's children.
Geeze! Some "freedom"!
To: All
35 posted on
11/10/2005 8:31:09 AM PST by
doug from upland
("Susan Estrich...get off your kneepads" - Juanita Broaddrick)
To: doug from upland; EdReform; Born Conservative; NYer; Liz; Jay777; onyx; Peach; Alouette; RonDog; ...
37 posted on
11/10/2005 11:55:47 AM PST by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: kenth; CatoRenasci; Marie; PureSolace; Congressman Billybob; P.O.E.; cupcakes; Amelia; Dianna; ...
Some of you on the list may find this of interest.
38 posted on
11/10/2005 12:22:50 PM PST by
Born Conservative
(The word bipartisan usually means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out - G. Carlin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson