[Nomorjer Kinov]

So the Post has admitted that on at least three occasions, Matt Mosk WAS MD4Bush. How can they now claim that he wasn't always MD4Bush if they cannot point to a substitute?

Also, as you know, one doesn't have to be a member to read the posts or to click on a member name to find the posting history. The only advantage to logging on is to read the private FreepMail - which is where MD4Bush received the Steffan musings, or to post.

[an amused spectator]

How can they now claim that he wasn't always MD4Bush if they cannot point to a substitute?

If you don't believe the Post, just ask them. They'll tell you that Matt Mosk wasn't always MD4Bush. ;-)

[expatpat]

They then put the private mail on the public forum -- you have to be logged on to do that.