To: Nomorjer Kinov; SeaBiscuit
How can they now claim that he wasn't always MD4Bush if they cannot point to a substitute? If you don't believe the Post, just ask them. They'll tell you that Matt Mosk wasn't always MD4Bush. ;-)
48 posted on
11/05/2005 5:07:26 PM PST by
an amused spectator
(If Social Security isn't broken, then cut me a check for the cash I have into it.)
To: an amused spectator; xcamel
I'm more inclined to believe Mosk IS MD4BUSH rather than some hacking of computers.
55 posted on
11/05/2005 5:10:58 PM PST by
SeaBiscuit
(God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
To: an amused spectator
If you don't believe the Post, just ask them. They'll tell you that Matt Mosk wasn't always MD4Bush. They could always try the Kerry Defense Gambit: "We know that Matt Mosk was MD4Bush before we knew that he wasn't MD4Bush."
155 posted on
11/05/2005 6:33:43 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(De gustibus non est disputandum.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson