Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victor Davis Hanson: The Real Global Virus. The plague of Islamism keeps on spreading.
NRO ^ | November 4, 2005 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 11/04/2005 5:46:12 AM PST by Tolik

Either the jihadists really are crazy or they apparently think that they have a shot at destabilizing, or at least winning concessions from, the United States, Europe, India, and Russia all at once.

Apart from the continual attacks on civilians by terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the West Bank, there have now been recent horrific assaults in New Dehli (blowing up civilians in a busy shopping season on the eve of a Hindu festival), Russia (attacking police and security facilities), London (suicide murdering of civilians on the subway), and Indonesia (more bombing, and the beheading of Christian schoolgirls). The loci of recent atrocities could be widely expanded (e.g., Malaysia, North Africa, Turkey, Spain) — and, of course, do not forget the several terrorist plots that have been broken up in Europe and the United States.

The commonalities? There are at least three.

First, despite the various professed grievances (e.g., India should get out of Kashmir; Russia should get out of Chechnya; England should get out of Iraq; Christians should get out of Indonesia; or Westerners should get out of Bali), the perpetrators were all self-proclaimed Islamic radicals. Westerners who embrace moral equivalence still like to talk of abortion bombings and Timothy McVeigh, but those are isolated and distant memories. No, the old generalization since 9/11 remains valid: The majority of Muslims are not global terrorists, but almost all such terrorists, and the majority of their sympathizers, are Muslims.

Second, the jihadists characteristically feel that dialogue or negotiations are beneath them. So like true fascists, they don’t talk; they kill. Their opponents — whether Christians, Hindus, Jews, or Westerners in general — are, as infidels, de facto guilty for what they are rather than what they supposedly do. Talking to a Dr. Zawahiri is like talking to Hitler: You can’t — and it’s suicidal to try.

Third, there is an emboldened sense that the jihadists can get away with their crimes based on three perceptions:

(1) Squabbling and politically correct Westerners are decadent and outnumber the U.S. Marines, and ascendant Islamicism resonates among millions of Muslims who feel sorely how far they have fallen behind in the new globalized world community — and how terrorism and blackmail, especially if energized by nuclear weapons or biological assets, might leapfrog them into a new caliphate.

(2) Sympathetic Muslim-dominated governments like Malaysia or Indonesia will not really make a comprehensive effort to eradicate radical Islamicist breeding grounds of terror, but will perhaps instead serve as ministries of propaganda for shock troops in the field.

(3) Autocratic states such as Pakistan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Iran share outright similar political objectives and will offer either stealthy sanctuary or financial support to terrorists, confident that either denial, oil, or nuclear bombs give them security .

Meanwhile, Westerners far too rarely publicly denounce radical Islam for its sick, anti-Semitic, anti-female, anti-American, and anti-modernist rhetoric. Just imagine the liberal response if across the globe Christians had beheaded schoolgirls, taken over schoolhouses to kill students, and shot school teachers as we have witnessed radical Muslims doing these past few months.

Instead, Western parlor elites are still arguing over whether there were al Qaedists in Iraq before the removal of Saddam Hussein, whether the suspicion of WMDs was the real reason for war against the Baathists, whether Muslim minorities should be pressured to assimilate into European democratic culture, and whether constitutional governments risk becoming intolerant in their new efforts to infiltrate and disrupt radical Muslim groups in Europe and the United States. Some of this acrimony is understandable, but such in-fighting is still secondary to defeating enemies who have pledged to destroy Western liberal society. At some point this Western cannibalism becomes not so much counterproductive as serving the purposes of those who wish America to call off its struggle against radical Islam.

Most Americans think that our present conflict is not comparable with World War II, in either its nature or magnitude. Perhaps — but they should at least recall the eerie resemblance of our dilemma to the spread of global fascism in the late 1930s.

At first few saw any real connection between the ruthless annexation of Manchuria by Japanese militarists, or Mussolini’s brutal invasion of Ethiopia, or the systematic aggrandizement of Eastern-European territory by Hitler. China was a long way from Abyssinia, itself far from Poland. How could a white-supremacist Nazi have anything in common with a racially-chauvinist Japanese or an Italian fascist proclaiming himself the new imperial Roman?

In response, the League of Nations dithered and imploded (sound familiar?). Rightist American isolationists (they’re back) assured us that fascism abroad was none of our business or that there were conspiracies afoot by Jews to have us do their dirty work. Leftists were only galvanized when Hitler finally turned on Stalin (perhaps we have to wait for Osama to attack Venezuela or Cuba to get the Left involved). Abroad even members of the British royal family were openly sympathetic to German grievances (cf. Prince Charles’s silence about Iran’s promise to wipe out Israel, but his puerile Edward VIII-like lectures to Americans about a misunderstood Islam). French appeasement was such that even the most humiliating concession was deemed preferable to the horrors of World War I (no comment needed).

We can, of course, learn from this. It’s past time that we quit worrying whether a killer who blows himself up on the West Bank, or a terrorist who shouts the accustomed jihadist gibberish as he crashes a jumbo jet into the World Trade Center, or a driver who rams his explosives-laden car into an Iraqi polling station, or a Chechnyan rebel who blows the heads off schoolchildren, is in daily e-mail contact with Osama bin Laden. Our present lax attitude toward jihadism is akin to deeming local outbreaks of avian flu as regional maladies without much connection to a new strain of a deadly — and global — virus.

Instead, the world—if it is to save its present liberal system of free trade, safe travel, easy and unfettered communications, and growing commitment to constitutional government—must begin seeing radical Islamism as a universal pathology rather than reactions to regional grievances, if it is ever to destroy it materially and refute it ideologically.

Yet the antidote for radical Islam, aside from the promotion of democratization and open economies, is simple. It must be militarily defeated when it emerges to wage organized violence, as in the cases of the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan, Zarqawi’s terrorists in Iraq, and the various killer cliques in Palestine.

Second, any who tolerate radical Islam should be ostracized. Muslims living in the West must be condemned when they assert that the Jews caused 9/11, or that suicide bombing is a legitimate response to Israel, or that Islamic immigrants’ own unique culture gives them a pass from accustomed assimilation, or that racial and religious affinity should allow tolerance for the hatred that spews forth from madrassas and mosques — before the patience of Western liberalism is exhausted and “the rules of the game” in Tony Blair’s words “change” quite radically and we begin to see mass invitations to leave.

Third, nations that intrigue with jihadists must be identified as the enemies of civilization. We often forget that there are now left only four major nation-states in the world that either by intent or indifference allow radical Islamists to find sanctuary.

If Pakistan were seriously to disavow terrorism and not see it as an asset in its rivalry with India and as a means to vent anti-Western angst, then Osama bin Laden, Dr. Zawahiri, and their lieutenants would be hunted down tomorrow.

If the petrolopolis of Saudi Arabia would cease its financial support of Wahhabi radicals, most terrorists could scarcely travel or organize operations.

If there were sane governments in Syria and Iran, then there would be little refuge left for al Qaeda, and the money and shelter that now protects the beleaguered and motley collection of ex-Saddamites, Hezbollah, and al Qaedists would cease.

So in large part four nations stand in the way of eradicating much of the global spread of jihadism — and it is no accident that either oil or nuclear weapons have won a global free pass for three of them. And it is no accident that we don’t have a means to wean ourselves off Middle East oil or as yet stop Iran from becoming the second Islamic nuclear nation.

But just as importantly, our leaders must explain far more cogently and in some detail — rather than merely assert — to the Western public the nature of the threat we face, and how our strategy will prevail.

In contrast, when the American public is still bickering over WMDs rather than relieved that the culprit for the first World Trade Center bombing can no longer find official welcome in Baghdad; or when our pundits seem more worried about Halliburton than the changes in nuclear attitudes in Libya and Pakistan; or when the media mostly ignores a greater percentage of voters turning out for a free national election in the heart of the ancient caliphate than during most election years in the United States — something has gone terribly, tragically wrong here at home.

Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. His latest book is A War Like No Other. How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islam; islamism; jihadists; vdh; victordavishanson; waronterror; wot; wwiv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2005 5:46:13 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; yonif; SJackson; dennisw; monkeyshine; Alouette; ...


    Victor Davis Hanson Ping ! 

       Let me know if you want in or out.

Links: FR Index of his articles:  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=victordavishanson 
His website: http://victorhanson.com/     NRO archive: http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson-archive.asp

2 posted on 11/04/2005 5:47:32 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

 We’re really having the wrong arguments.
3 posted on 11/04/2005 5:51:02 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

It is all Bush's fault according to the Rats and MSM. We should have left the religion of peace alone and let them kill everyone they wanted to.


4 posted on 11/04/2005 5:54:41 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

Thanks, good post Tolik.


5 posted on 11/04/2005 5:57:17 AM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolik
something has gone terribly, tragically wrong here at home

Davis nails the situation as usual. The next Presidential election is going to be incredibly important. The Democrats will be running against Bush and Bush's legacy. They won't have a clue about how to "MoveOn" (ironic, ain't it?). Whoever the Republicans put up has to be able to carry the War on Terror or more accurately the War on Islamic Fascism" forward and better communicate why it's important. I fear a self-absorbed American public will as they did post-Vietmam, just turn the music up and dance to the opiate of another disco beat.

6 posted on 11/04/2005 5:57:24 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

..........................................

7 posted on 11/04/2005 5:58:31 AM PST by SJackson (God isn`t dead. We just can`t talk to Him in the classroom anymore, R Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

WOW! WOW! What a great article. Although the plague of Islam is still spreading, it appears that the rest of the world is waking up (finally) to what has been going on. If we all at one time decided not to tolerate it, we could put a real dent in it. I'm not talking about allying ourselves together, which probably would not work, as it would bog us down; I mean that if all countries dealt with it in their own way at the same time, progress could be made. I think, and hope, that as the Islamic terrorists get worse, the reaction to fight it will intensify.


8 posted on 11/04/2005 6:05:40 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Piquaboy

..."We in America know the benevolence that is at the heart of Islam," declared Condoleezza Rice,...


10 posted on 11/04/2005 6:08:09 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Ugh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: SJackson
The Real Global Virus. The plague of Islamism keeps on spreading

Interesting the correalation of virus's. . .

The 'cancer on the presidency' of the Clinton Years; seem to still be reaching into our present; the 'Avian' flu having surfaced in l997.

And the our country and George Bush. . .still having to clean up; enlist huge defensive measures; while taking responsibility' for any viral fall-out. . .

12 posted on 11/04/2005 6:19:47 AM PST by cricket (No Freedom - No Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

another great VDH missive. thanks


13 posted on 11/04/2005 6:21:01 AM PST by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

-b-


14 posted on 11/04/2005 6:21:09 AM PST by rellimpank (urbanites don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm:NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

The NY Post recently ran a VDH article. In the letters to the editor the next day some lib responded that he was "woefully uninformed".

I almost spat out my coffee. VDH is one of the most intelligent commentators around, yet Joe Schmo from the Bronx knows more than he does.

Good work, libs! Keep it up!


15 posted on 11/04/2005 6:21:39 AM PST by Personal Responsibility (All I want for tomorrow is to make it better than today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

I guess that you CAN take that statement two ways.


16 posted on 11/04/2005 6:21:51 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
These vermin must be eradicated, not integrated

...you are so right...islam's foundation was based on terror and murder. Islam is as widespread as it is today because it is based on terror and murder. Therefore, islam "leaders" must be terrorists and murderers or islam will collapse, and they know it. Islam itself is the target for it is not an organization that can be run by peace loving people...it needs force to get "converts" and to keep the flock in line.

17 posted on 11/04/2005 6:23:59 AM PST by B.O. Plenty (Islam, liberalism and abortions are terminal..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

bttt


18 posted on 11/04/2005 6:29:47 AM PST by Dark Skies ("A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Well Victor doesn't use barking moonbat logic, so the lib didn't understand what VDH was saying...(and they need to use that phrase to try to intimidate people)


19 posted on 11/04/2005 6:29:48 AM PST by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tolik
something has gone terribly, tragically wrong here at home

I think the bickering and demagoguery prevalent in Washington is despicable evidence that the 'professional political class' is populated by unprincipled egotists who value personal political power first, political party second, and country last. In general they crave the trappings of position and prestige, but hide from the responsibilities these things entail. Both sides of the isle deserve to be FIRED when they stand for reelection.

20 posted on 11/04/2005 6:31:33 AM PST by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson