Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Beachhead at Panama Canal
Insight Magazine ^ | Oct. 31, 2005 | J. Michael Waller

Posted on 11/02/2005 1:27:48 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2005 1:27:49 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Thanks, Peanut Brain.


2 posted on 11/02/2005 1:28:45 PM PST by A-10 (Our Lady of Blessed Acceleration, don't fail us now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

China has absolutely zero power projection ability outside of Asia. If we wanted to take the canal by force, we could do it in a matter of hours.


3 posted on 11/02/2005 1:30:15 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (http://www.navyfield.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

What a paranoid article. When was that written, 5 years ago?


4 posted on 11/02/2005 1:32:43 PM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Chinese, illegal aliens at the time, helped build the first Transcontinental Railroad. Since the purpose of the Railroad was to open a trade route to China, it seems to have worked out. The Canal and New Orleans came to dominate trade. Air freight is coming along now, so that the canal isn't much of a choke point.


5 posted on 11/02/2005 1:34:58 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

Looks like 1998-9. And this was under Clinton so the paranoia is very understandable.


6 posted on 11/02/2005 1:35:08 PM PST by thoughtomator (Alito Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Do you really think some little enterprising chinaman hasn't figured out that maybe, possibly stacking some demolitions munitions next to the locks is a good idea in case we do that?

We could take it but then we would have a wrcked canal. Which is still loads better than letting the Chinese having it available in a war.

7 posted on 11/02/2005 1:35:23 PM PST by Centurion2000 ((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Another Carter idiocy that will bite us.


8 posted on 11/02/2005 1:36:46 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Thank you Jimmy Carter!!! Anyone want to elect another Communist for President -- vote third party -- it could happen and the next one may just give away the whole USA to the commies.


9 posted on 11/02/2005 1:37:18 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
They probably would blow it up but it could be fixed. Of course we probably have a contingency plan for just such an event and most likely would have Spec-Ops teams attempt to seize the locks before they could be destroyed.
10 posted on 11/02/2005 1:38:04 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (http://www.navyfield.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
China has absolutely zero power projection ability outside of Asia. If we wanted to take the canal by force, we could do it in a matter of hours.

Power projection ability begins with thermonuclear weapons, undoubtedly on-site and armed in Panama.

11 posted on 11/02/2005 1:38:21 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (THIS IS WAR AND I MEAN TO WIN IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

That's right... if we go to war over Taiwan they block us at the Panama and we have to go around... or ship everything to the West Coast then they gain the upper hand...


12 posted on 11/02/2005 1:38:24 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Looks like 1998-9. And this was under Clinton so the paranoia is very understandable.

Well, think again. As recently as 2003, the Communist front company Hutchison Wampoa hired none other than Richard Perle -- who was chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board at the time -- to lobby the U.S. Department of Defense for a DOD waiver when the company was trying to purchase the trans-Pacific fiber-optic assets of Global Crossing.

Call me cynical, but stories like this are why I'll never trust anyone in government.

13 posted on 11/02/2005 1:42:08 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Again, special thanks go out to another democrat for screwing our national security, Jimmy Carter, a total loser.


14 posted on 11/02/2005 1:42:51 PM PST by b4its2late (It's lonely at the top, but you eat better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

The Panama Canal is currently of extremely limited importance to the US Navy strategically; this isn't World War II.

Carriers are too big to pass through it anyway, and those are the key mobile assets to the US Navy.


15 posted on 11/02/2005 1:43:47 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

When was that written, 5 years ago?-------Bout same time COSCO was trying for the base at Long Beach,Kalifornicate?


16 posted on 11/02/2005 1:43:59 PM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: conserv13
When was that written, 5 years ago?

Issue Date: October 31, 2005

18 posted on 11/02/2005 1:45:14 PM PST by b4its2late (It's lonely at the top, but you eat better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Well if we have trouble with access to the canal. I am sure we will sieze it.


19 posted on 11/02/2005 1:46:26 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litehaus
When was that written, 5 years ago?-------Bout same time COSCO was trying for the base at Long Beach,Kalifornicate?

Spell the name of my state correctly, a$$hat.

20 posted on 11/02/2005 1:47:41 PM PST by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson