Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Beachhead at Panama Canal
Insight Magazine ^ | Oct. 31, 2005 | J. Michael Waller

Posted on 11/02/2005 1:27:48 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Mr. Mojo

when was this published? clearly Clinton couldn't have replaced an Ambassador who made statements 3 years ago. And, for that matter, Adm. Moorer died over a year ago.
This was litigated up to the Supreme Court on 12/31/99, the day of the turnover of the Canal to Panama.


41 posted on 11/02/2005 3:26:27 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
when was this [originally] published?

Hell if I know, but it's published in the Oct. 31, 2005 issue of Insight Mag., and there's no mention of a previous pub. date.

42 posted on 11/02/2005 3:29:51 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; megatherium; Squantos; Travis McGee; Lurker; Noumenon
The cariers are the principle vessels that will not fit...but the destroyers, frigates, supply ships, ammo ships, the large amphibious assault ships, etc. do fit.

There is significant militatry meaning to the canal to this day. If a major conflict broke out in the Western Pacific, a lot of ships, men and material would be transfered from bases and duty stations in the Atlantic to the Pacific (or vice versa).

Without the canal...ALL of that would have to go around South America. Which would add significant time and danger to the transfer and reinforcement over the long haul.

43 posted on 11/02/2005 3:43:17 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; All
Unresolved Questions- the Panama canal, good, bad, or a waiting disaster?--thread II
44 posted on 11/02/2005 5:04:09 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winodog

Didn't Carter have a democratic congress?


45 posted on 11/02/2005 6:31:20 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Add Hugo Chavez, Daniel Ortega, Fidel Castro, and an authoritian Russia to the mix, and you have lots of fun.


46 posted on 11/02/2005 8:49:49 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet
The Panamanians, Venezuelans, or Cubans could lease bases to China or Russia for Nuke projection.
47 posted on 11/02/2005 8:51:16 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd; JeanS; WoofDog123; xjcsa; connectthedots; Mr. Mojo
The Panama Canal cannot be defended by anyone including the Chinese. It could be disabled for months with some kerosene, fertilizer and blasting caps. The "yellow peril" may exist, but it probably it is in Vancouver, B.C. 39 posted on 11/02/2005 3:10:28 PM PST by shrinkermd

Or in Baltimore, Boston, and all the other US cities where the China Ocean Shipping (Group) Company (COSCO) has warehouses...



http://www.cosco-usa.com/about/aboutCCLA.htm

Cosco Container Lines Americas, Inc.
100 Lighting Way
Secaucus, NJ 07094 USA

China Ocean Shipping (Group) Company (COSCO), the national flag carrier of the People's Republic of China, is one of the world's premier full service intermodal carriers.  The company utilizes a vast network of ocean vessels, barges, railroad and motor carriers to link the international shipper with the consignee. 

Founded in 1961, COSCO has consistently been the world's fastest growing shipping company over the past decade and is now one of the largest container operators in the world.  The company's core international shipping business is divided between Chinese imports/exports and cross trade cargos. 

Additional services offered include shipping agency services, freight forwarding, terminals and warehousing, intermodal services, insurance, real estate, as well as ship repair and manning.

Cosco Container Lines, headquartered in Shanghai.  COSCON's operations are managed by regional offices in New York, Hamburg, Sydney, Tokyo, Seoul, Singapore, Dubai, Johannesburg and Beijing. 85 representative offices are maintained in 49 countries around the world, while operational agencies are located in 1000 cities in 160 countries.

Bigger Faster Ships
COSCO continues to make major investments in its equipment.  New, larger ships have greatly increased COSCO's capabilities.  Included is the addition of five 5,250 TEU vessels with expanded refrigerated capacity for 1,000 plugs per vessel.  Currently the company owns and operates a fleet of more than 117 container ships for a total capacity of 256,171 TEU.  Capacity on owned and leased containers total nearly 535,000 TEU.  Included in this total are 191,687 - 40 foot containers and 22,862 temperature controlled units.  Cargo handling capabilities include 20 ft. and 40 ft. dry containers, refrigerated containers, flat-racks, open tops, high cubes and other specialized equipment.

Quicker, More Efficient Shipping Than Any Other Carrier
In addition to the improvements in equipment, recent scheduling additions and revisions have resulted in significantly faster transit times for COSCO's customers... as much as 10% faster than just a year ago.  COSCO's 20 Main Line Services connect over 100 ports worldwide to reach more direct ports of call than any other carrier in the world.  COSCO's knowledge of China is unmatched by any other carrier.  In particular, COSCO offers invaluable expertise of the rail, truck and feeder services.  Especially important for shipments that are bound for or being shipped from the nation's interior.

Backed by the company's outstanding track record, COSCO remains committed to outstanding service and dynamic, consistent growth.  The company's young management team in the North American headquarters look forward to a very bright future for both COSCO and their customers.

 
 

Select Office Below

Return to Home Page

48 posted on 11/12/2005 9:05:33 AM PST by j_accuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Do you really think some little enterprising chinaman hasn't figured out that maybe, possibly stacking some demolitions munitions next to the locks is a good idea in case we do that? We could take it but then we would have a wrcked canal. Which is still loads better than letting the Chinese having it available in a war. 7 posted on 11/02/2005 1:35:23 PM PST by Centurion2000 ((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)

Extremely unlikely. Considering the Chinese already have "bases" in sensitive ports like Secaucus and Long Beach, they have a better access to wreck US ports of entry. In addition, the Panamanians are the ones controlling the Panama Canal, as you may have noticed during your last visit to Panama....


U.S. President Bush, right, crosses the Panama Canal as he tours Miraflores Locks with Panama's President Martin Torrijos, in Panama City Monday, Nov. 7, 2005. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)


U.S. President George W. Bush (3rd L) and first lady Laura Bush (2nd R), are given a tour by Panama President Martin Torrijos (2nd L) of the Miraflores Locks at the Panama Canal in Panama City, Panama, November 7, 2005. (L to R) Panama first lady Vivian Fernandez de Torrijos, Torrijos, Bush, Administrator of the Panama Canal Alberto Aleman Zubieta, Panama Minister of Economy and Finances Ricaurte Vasquez, and Laura Bush. Bush said on Monday the United States and Panama were close to completing a free trade agreement as he ended a Latin American tour that fell short of his goal of reviving talks on a hemispheric-wide trade zone. Bush wrapped up his trip to Argentina, Brazil and Panama with a visit to the Miraflores lock of the Panama Canal, nearly 99 years after Theodore Roosevelt came in 1906 to see the canal construction in the first visit abroad by a U.S. president. REUTERS/Larry Downing

49 posted on 11/12/2005 9:14:09 AM PST by j_accuse (I told ya there were no Chinese soldiers in Panama ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

"Well if we have trouble with access to the canal. I am sure we will sieze it."

Before or after Canal infrastructure are destroyed?


50 posted on 11/12/2005 9:20:18 AM PST by Rebelbase (Food stamps, section-8, State paid Child support, etc. pay more than the min. wage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

And?? Do you suspect the Canal would not be usable for a long time???


51 posted on 11/12/2005 9:23:34 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson