[Alberta's Child]

Yet you're a closet socialist because you believe that the purpose of the tax code is to punish success and reward failure.

I challenge you to go back through every message I've ever posted here on FreeRepublic over the last five years and find a single case in which I've ever advocated "punishing success" and "rewarding failure."

I have to admit that I find it very funny to see all of these examples right here on this site of so-called "conservative" people who are willing to put their principles aside simply because they benefit from something that they would consider an outrage under any other circumstances.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

I challenge you to go back through every message I've ever posted here on FreeRepublic over the last five years and find a single case in which I've ever advocated "punishing success" and "rewarding failure."

"There is absolutely no reason why the U.S. taxpayer should be subsidizing homeowners and the real estate industry."

This statement alone shows that you believe that all money rightly belongs to the government and any money that the government does not, by threat of violence, remove from a taxpayer's pocket is a "subsidy."

PS - Did you know homeowners are taxpayers? Did you know they pay boo-coo property taxes, which are the primary source of funds for the socialist public education system?

You seem pretty ignorant, so I just wanted to make sure.