Posted on 11/01/2005 8:11:58 AM PST by areafiftyone
Beautiful !
Hillary is concerned the he will be a "guardian of the rule of law." We are concerned that she can't be a guardian of something as simple as billing records in her former law firm.
Oh, they'll be forthcoming, Hillary, don't you worry your little head about it. And, if they 'don't recall' answers to some of the questions, I just know you'll understand.
Didn't get your "consensus" nominee, eh Hillary?
BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Only ONE reason for a NO vote, it's a Republican President, not a Democrap one.
She asks if Judge Alito will be a guardian of the rule of law - puts fairness and justice before ideology - the LAW isn't about what is fair or ought to be - the LAW is how it is written period. Mrs. Clinton ought to be asked the same question as she is all about ideology and the THIRD WAY.....it just boggles the mind how stupid this woman thinks we are. Ms. Clinton has demonstrated many times what she thinks about law the law rarely touches this empty pant suit that struts about impersonating a senator
..when in fact she is in politics for the POWER.
Considering the article was about Hillary, "hag" was an understandable, Freudian like slip.
Pretending to play it safe. Advancing her newest persona as that of 'moderate'. Don't worry, lol, she's saving the war for later.
Perhaps we, the American people, "must initiate a thoughtful and deliberate process of closely examining and scrutinizing Judge Alitos Sen. Clinton's record to determine whether he she merits a seat on the highest court in the nation in our nation's senate.
Such arrogance in her 'statement'. Could she pass the same test?
Scroll down to "How About That "Strip Search" Decision?" Read it all as this will surely come up and the MSM will manipulate and confuse the facts. Don't let them get away with it so read and prepare yourself with fact!
You care to explain that one?
She's starting to sound more like that new TV series every day. Guess she thinks if the shows ratings are good because the character is "thoughtful", it'll work for her. Two fiction shows in the making!!
Unsubstantive.
Fundamental right to what Hillary? Come on, tell the American people what you mean. ;-)
Seems Hillary wants to separate herself from the race baiting Chuckie Schumer. As well as avoid the "mob" connections the DNC is alledging. She's still voting no, we all are aware of it.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah blah blah blah......
Jeannie Pirro
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . . . . . . .
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . . . . . snarf, snort, sniff . . . .
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
"...a thoughtful hearing". I thought the Senate was going to consider his credentials. The two aren'r really very compatible.
Dang you make alot of noise when you sleep! ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.