Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Roberts of CBS just apoligized for "sloppy" comments
White House Press Briefing | oct. 31, 2005

Posted on 10/31/2005 11:54:41 AM PST by blogblogginaway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last
To: Eagles Talon IV
My guess is the idiot had no clue as to the meaning of what he said.

I'm betting that is the case. This is one of those few times that I think people should just accept the apology, move on, and be ready to raise up on their hind legs if it happens again.

21 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:18 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

CBS REPORTER TO WHITE HOUSE: ALITO 'SLOPPY SECONDS?'
Mon Oct 31 2005 11:26:56 ET

CBSNEWS Chief White House correspondent John Roberts described the President’s selection of Judge Samuel Alito as “sloppy seconds” during today’s press gaggle with White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan.

John Roberts: “So, Scott, you said that -- or the President said, repeatedly, that Harriet Miers was the best person for the job. So does that mean that Alito is sloppy seconds, or what?”

Scott McClellan: “Not at all, John.”

Sloppy seconds” is described in the United Kingdom’s A Dictionary of Slang as:

Noun: “A subsequent indulgence in an activity by a second person involving an exchange of bodily fluids. This may involve the sharing of drink, or more often it applies to a sexual nature. E.g. ‘I’m not having sloppy seconds, I want to shag her first.’”

Developing...
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9i.htm


22 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:20 AM PST by blogblogginaway (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Or at least pull his White House Press Pass. The man shouldn't be allowed to darken the doorway of the White House ever again.


23 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:20 AM PST by Spiff ("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

McClellan should have replied..."Thats ok. When you said sloppy seconds, I thought you meant the guy you picked up over in Adams-Morgan last night."


24 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:23 AM PST by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you dont have to...." ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9i.htm


25 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:25 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Conservatives on a roll!!!!!!!! I love it.


26 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:30 AM PST by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Wow, an apology from SeeBS. Maybe there's hope, maybe things are about to change, maybe ......... never mind, what was I thinking?
27 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:40 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

I still say he should have been lead out of the White House and relieved of his White House pass, regardless of who's president.


28 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:45 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NY Times headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS, Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

From Drudge ReportCBS REPORTER TO WHITE HOUSE: ALITO 'SLOPPY SECONDS?'
Mon Oct 31 2005 11:26:56 ET

CBSNEWS Chief White House correspondent John Roberts described the President’s selection of Judge Samuel Alito as “sloppy seconds” during today’s press gaggle with White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan.

John Roberts: “So, Scott, you said that -- or the President said, repeatedly, that Harriet Miers was the best person for the job. So does that mean that Alito is sloppy seconds, or what?”

Scott McClellan: “Not at all, John.”

Sloppy seconds” is described in the United Kingdom’s A Dictionary of Slang as:

Noun: “A subsequent indulgence in an activity by a second person involving an exchange of bodily fluids. This may involve the sharing of drink, or more often it applies to a sexual nature. E.g. ‘I’m not having sloppy seconds, I want to shag her first.’”

Developing...


29 posted on 10/31/2005 11:58:48 AM PST by w_over_w (This tagline is blank, well, not actually blank but it would be if I didn't just tell you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

From Drudge: CBS REPORTER TO WHITE HOUSE: ALITO 'SLOPPY SECONDS?'
Mon Oct 31 2005 11:26:56 ET

CBSNEWS Chief White House correspondent John Roberts described the President’s selection of Judge Samuel Alito as “sloppy seconds” during today’s press gaggle with White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan.

John Roberts: “So, Scott, you said that -- or the President said, repeatedly, that Harriet Miers was the best person for the job. So does that mean that Alito is sloppy seconds, or what?”

Scott McClellan: “Not at all, John.”

Sloppy seconds” is described in the United Kingdom’s A Dictionary of Slang as:

Noun: “A subsequent indulgence in an activity by a second person involving an exchange of bodily fluids. This may involve the sharing of drink, or more often it applies to a sexual nature. E.g. ‘I’m not having sloppy seconds, I want to shag her first.’


30 posted on 10/31/2005 11:59:04 AM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WBL 1952

You think he deserves to be fired over the "sloppy seconds" comment??? Was it in poor taste? Yes. But to fire him over that? I probably wouldn't.


31 posted on 10/31/2005 11:59:08 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway; grellis
"Unfortunate" -- most over-misused word of the last century.

It means "unlucky." This wasn't "unlucky."

It was crude and offensive.

Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG

32 posted on 10/31/2005 11:59:09 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Must have forgot that BJ wasn't President, what a maroon!

Pray for W and Our Troops

33 posted on 10/31/2005 11:59:46 AM PST by bray (Iraq, freed from Saddamn now Pray for Freedom from Mohammad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

It's tough to divide the language so what is said inside staff meetings does not drift out into public. That separates the pros from the wannabees.


34 posted on 10/31/2005 11:59:50 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Childish.


35 posted on 10/31/2005 11:59:52 AM PST by ez (If you're the party of tolerance, then tolerate my intolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w_over_w

Drudge has no mention of apology as yet...


36 posted on 10/31/2005 12:00:02 PM PST by Dansong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Scott should have let Roberts finish. He meant to say,"I'm sorry for my unfortunate choice of words this morning, and the fact that I am a bottom-dwelling liberal troll who wishes to belittle all that is good with this country"
37 posted on 10/31/2005 12:00:18 PM PST by keithtoo (Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - Founding Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WBL 1952
I just called CBS and lodged my very strong complaint. The woman who answered sounded very, very beleaguered.
38 posted on 10/31/2005 12:01:07 PM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

wow, roll on conervatives.........


39 posted on 10/31/2005 12:01:09 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Is it safe to say that today Roberts lost whatever shot he had at the anchor desk?


40 posted on 10/31/2005 12:01:14 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson