Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/31/2005 9:33:57 AM PST by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Checkers

"As I wrote below, the best way to preempt a filibuster is for the nine Republicans thought lukewarm or hostile to the constitutional option to announce, early and often, that they will vote for the constitutional option if Democrats attempt a filibuster based upon ideology. If the Senate Democrats know they are going to lose the vote, they will have to approach this debate much, much differently. And if the MSM loses their filibuster storyline early, it will be difficult to campaign on air to legitimize the practice.

Senator Graham led the way for the nine yesterday, and the other 8 ought to follow:

Senator McCain mccain.senate.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=Contact.Home (202) 224-2235

Senator Warner warner.senate.gov/contact/contactme.cfm (202) 224-2023

Senator DeWine dewine.senate.gov (202) 224-2315

Senator Chafee chafee.senate.gov/webform.htm (202) 224-2921

Senator Snowe http://snowe.senate.gov/Webform.htm (202) 224-5344

Senator Collins collins.senate.gov/low/contactemail.htm (202) 224-2523

Senator Hagel hagel.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Offices.Contact (202) 224-4224

Senator Specter (202) 224-4254 specter.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInfo.Home "


2 posted on 10/31/2005 9:35:28 AM PST by Checkers (I broke the dam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Knowing that the democrats on the judiciary committee would pull out the long knives on any nomination, Bush was forced to pick another Justice in the mold of Roberts - a Justice that can talk circles around the democrats on the committee and teach them a lesson in constitutional law.


3 posted on 10/31/2005 9:37:20 AM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

So, has any one of the a-holes, er, senators made a statement in behalf of Alito yet?


4 posted on 10/31/2005 9:38:01 AM PST by rockrr (Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
I'm from Boca Raton and I'm just checking in a week after Wilma.

So who's this Alito guy? Is George Bush still president? What's been happening?

Just jokin' y'all. Nice to be back on FR after a week...

5 posted on 10/31/2005 9:38:01 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

mark


6 posted on 10/31/2005 9:38:40 AM PST by sauropod ("Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important." - T.S. Eliot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Silly Talk
[Mark R. Levin 10/31 09:54 AM]
On ABC's "Good Morning America," Linda Douglass reported that Sam Alito "is another white male." Actually, as I think about it, he's less white than the show's anchor, Charles Gibson. Alito's skin tone appears to me to be more olive. I wonder, if Janice Rogers Brown had been nominated, would reporters like Linda Douglass have been more impressed? Of course not. Speaking of Gibson, he said that Alito was "very conservative." I don't know what this means. But more importantly, given that Gibson probably hasn't read a single opinion authored by Alito, he's speaking from talking points.


7 posted on 10/31/2005 9:41:24 AM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

I applaud Hewitt for being an adult, and wholeheartedly backing this nominee, without a hint of harking back to the recent unpleasantness.

I agree with his opinion here for the most part, but I sincerely think it would be better in the long run if we had the filibuster battle and won it, so it wouldn't rear its ugly head again.


8 posted on 10/31/2005 9:41:33 AM PST by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
A LONG fight for SCOTUS can only benefit the republicans..
Democrats will appear sillier and sillier and obstructionist the longer it develops..
The pubbies SHOULD take steps to PROLONG the fight not shorten it..

But again that would be smart.. never happen..

19 posted on 10/31/2005 10:47:50 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

bump


26 posted on 10/31/2005 4:57:37 PM PST by Checkers (I broke the dam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
Hewitt must be a bit off balance from the Miers dustup.

He indicates that Hagel might vote against Alito while ignoring Nelson (D-NE) who seems perfectly willing to go along with Alito on TV tonight during an appearance on MSNBC with Hatch. Certainly, Hatch did the heavy lifting for Alito but Nelson could hardly be described as being in opposition. Still a Democrat but a far more moderate one, one willing to play the Miller card if he likes but without burning his bridges to his base, an aging moderate Democrat and younger liberal Republican base. I don't know that he's too afraid of the GOP recruiting an opponent in his election next year, given that Johanns, the only credible candidate, abandoned his governor's post without completing his term to serve as Bush's ag secretary. This has pretty much ruined Johanns' chances of returning for an '06 run.

Nelson was actually making a tenuous defence of Alito's Casey dissent, mentioning that while he was governor, he helped shepherd a parental notification bill through the Unicameral. I'm not certain everyone in Nebraska would agree with Nelson's characterization exactly but Nelson didn't cause trouble over it either. Nelson also hinted that it may be time to re-visit the abortion issue in general. It is notable that Nelson was willing to provide some cover for Alito on talking points being used against Alito and to try to be positive toward him while not surrendering too much ground. It indicates to me that Nelson is ready to confirm Alito. And that means Hagel must already be fully on board for Alito. Those two are rarely any great distance apart on key issues, especially on red-meat issues. It's not in the interests of either one to be too far apart and Nebraska's conservative voters don't like it.

Anyone who thinks Nelson is going to get to the far Right of Hagel (by Dim and MSM standards) really needs to think again.

Hugh, stop takin' them crazy pills!
27 posted on 10/31/2005 9:09:31 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson