Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Alito's First Name "Conservative"? You'd Think so to Listen to Today Show
Today Show/NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 10/31/2005 4:34:41 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

by Mark Finkelstein

October 31, 2005 - 08:01.

When Bill Clinton nominated ACLU general counsel Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court, what are the odds that, in the very first sentence of its report, the Today show described Ginsburg as "liberal"? Roughly the same as the Saints winning this year's Super Bowl, perhaps?

Yet this is how Katie Couric opened Today this morning: "Breaking news: President Bush is nominating conservative judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court."

Matt Lauer got into the spirit, adding Alito "is so consistently conservative he has been called 'Scalito,'" i.e., in the mold of Justice Antonin Scalia.

Tim Russert then weighed in, expressing skepticism that Alito could get 60-65 Senate votes. Russert did acknowledge that Ted Kennedy praised Alito when he was nominated to the Appeals Court, but explained that that was 15 years ago and Kennedy will will make a distinction now that Alito is being nominated to the Supreme Court.

Couric then interviewed law prof Jonathan Turley, with Katie describing Turley as having been "absolutely brutal" in his initial comments on Harriet Miers' nomination, having called her "an amazingly bad choice."

Turley predicted a melee over Alito: "I think it's going to get pretty sporty around here. There's a lot in Alito's background that is going to coalesce Democratic groups."

Turley foresaw Alito as being to join the Court's "hard right. There will be no one to the right of Sam Alito on this court," he observed.

"Not even Scalia?" asked a shocked Couric.

"So no smooth sailing for the confirmation hearings?" asked Katie. "I think the Democrats are going to come out of the dugout on this one," predicted Turley

Katie inquired whether in picking Alito "ideology trumped gender?"

"No one on the conservative base can be unhappy with Alito. The question is whether they can weather this storm," answered Turley.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: alito; couric; lauer; russert; todayshow; turley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

So you tell us. ROFL!!!!


81 posted on 10/31/2005 5:46:20 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

See post 18. That was a 15 year old quote.


82 posted on 10/31/2005 5:46:23 AM PST by beyond the sea (Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

See post # 18.


83 posted on 10/31/2005 5:46:48 AM PST by beyond the sea (Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Did anyone catch the story on high gas prices and profits? They interviewed a Dim who said, basically, "They're making too much money. So we should tax the crap out of them."

Yes, amid high gas prices, the Dim solution is to tax more.


84 posted on 10/31/2005 5:47:40 AM PST by GR Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
Russert and Katie are Catholic.

Correction. Russert and Katie are "Catholic."
85 posted on 10/31/2005 5:49:05 AM PST by ConservativeWarrior (Your Tagline Here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GR Freeper
"They're making too much money. So we should tax the crap out of them."

Every time I hear someone recommend increasing taxes on oil companies because prices are too high, I wonder to myself if they realize that doing so will only increase prices?!

86 posted on 10/31/2005 5:49:16 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: wita

Gotcha - no prob.


87 posted on 10/31/2005 5:50:16 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax
It won't be the supreme court anymore, it will be the governing council of opus dei, taking their marching orders directly from the big guy in Rome.

Scary.

I'm not a Catholic, but would call that some pretty ugly anti-Catholic bigotry.

So you believe that Scalia has been taking his orders from the Pope? Care to cite examples thereof?

88 posted on 10/31/2005 5:52:46 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

In other perky news ...

GIRL ON GIRL

DESPITE appearances, Katie Couric probably isn't hot for New York Times fashion writer Elizabeth Hayt. When Hayt appeared on the "Today" show to promote her sexually explicit memoir, "I'm No Saint: A Nasty Little Memoir of Love and Leaving," Couric told Hayt that she was so gorgeous, if she were a guy, she would date her. But an insider tells us that when Hayt arrived wearing a gray, low-cut Valentino sweater, the prim Couric grabbed the front and tried to pull it up over her cleavage, saying, 'This is middle America!' "

http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix_u.htm


89 posted on 10/31/2005 6:09:07 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
When Hayt arrived wearing a gray, low-cut Valentino sweater, the prim Couric grabbed the front and tried to pull it up over her cleavage, saying, 'This is middle America!'

Could this have been the sweater [this really is Hayt!]


90 posted on 10/31/2005 6:14:24 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

LOL


91 posted on 10/31/2005 6:19:16 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The important thing is: will this give the Left the opportunity to spin the nomination to their advantage, getting plenty of air time on TV and raido, will elitist CINOs now get the "fight" they wanted and "deserved" over a nominee who meets their high standards?


92 posted on 10/31/2005 6:28:03 AM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

no problem... let's find all the positive quotes by dems about Alito and get radio/tv to proclaim them. it doesn't matter when they were said.


93 posted on 10/31/2005 6:44:05 AM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

thanks for info Lautenberg endorsing Alito. I get the state loyalty thing, but I don't think Lautenberg would have been so quickly "out there" if he thought his vote would be deciding. Let us know what Corizone has to say, and how long he waits to say it.


94 posted on 10/31/2005 6:45:06 AM PST by YaYa123 (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

It was a joke. I am a catholic.


95 posted on 10/31/2005 6:45:41 AM PST by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
E.D. Hill ain't much better.

EXACTLY!

96 posted on 10/31/2005 6:51:17 AM PST by Born Conservative (Prince Charles is Camilla Parker Bowles' tampon - MadIvan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

kateeee is in that same old stale, musty, old hat category of the teddeeee, dashill, biden, leahy, boxer and pelosi and any others I can't think of right now. katteee has lost her perky cute littlw whatever it was people saw in her. She's got tougher competition out there now so she's got to get even worse than she ever was. Don't watch her or any network news. Have better things to do with my life. I'll wait for Rush Limbaugh whom I love and trust.


97 posted on 10/31/2005 6:52:51 AM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for our country than anyone will ever know. He's a man of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax

Sorry - humor somtimes gets lost in the cyberspace translation.

There was another poster on this thread very seriously complaining about W's failure to appoint a Protestant.


98 posted on 10/31/2005 7:01:52 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

No Problemo. I should have added the /saracsm tag.


99 posted on 10/31/2005 8:50:52 AM PST by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: gobucks

Conservative, originalist ones are not.


100 posted on 10/31/2005 9:28:34 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson