Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dogbyte12
Fitzgerald stated that Libby stated he did not know about Valerie Plame until hearing it from Russert around July 12th. He showed that Libby lied.

If true and no context, then yes Libby is guilty. It's pretty sleazy that Fitz has created a crime where none had existed, but the games Libby was playing make it clear he recalled exactly where the info came from. Of course, why would he say Russert told him if Russert never did and why would he lie about his notes? Maybe he did so before.

If what Fitzgerald is saying is accurate, Libby lied his ass off. That is all there is to it.

Agreed.

Which is minor in the grand scheme of things, but I am dissapointed in Freepers who try to rationalize lying.

Agreed.

Fitz is going way over the top, though. I mean, 5 counts???

2,604 posted on 10/28/2005 12:10:00 PM PDT by AmishDude (Welcome to the judicial oligarchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2430 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude

He is going over the top with five counts but I cannot believe the people on here defending him for (alleged) lying to the FBI and GJ.


2,874 posted on 10/28/2005 12:43:26 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2604 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson