Posted on 10/28/2005 5:00:46 AM PDT by kcvl
Per Fox News...
Well ... you have a point
Placemark.
Why is Fox playing sound bites from the presser...why are we being tortured?
I think he is relying on classification laws in general rather than that one limited statute. Still about as lame.
Sounds like it
Chris Wolf .. Wilson's attorney on MSNBC
Fotz even lost it. I suppose he's been reading the news all along....looking for tidbits. The Grand Jury is probably "insane" by now and thank God can go home. Someone mentioned that the Prosecutor usually gets what he wants from the jury.
Wilson attorney reading a statement now.
CSPAM's still on the air?
"Fitz: "IF" the charges in the indictment are true.
VERY telling."
That does not make him sound confident in the charges he's applying in this case, does it?
Haven't read all the posts yet so don't know if anyone touched on this, but is he actually charging Libby under the Espionage Act, which Fitzgerald said is vague?
If I am not wrong in this, Fitzgerald is putting some barriers up that Libby's attorneys may have difficulty with--that is, finding which GJ witnesses to depose. An effort that could be construed as taking unfair advantage of a person open for indictment who cannot listen or speak to other grand jury witnesses because they have been muzzled by the prosecutor.
Just my thought. By the way, In my previous post I made a judgment favorable to Fitzgerald based on his psychological approach to the press conference. I, of course, have not passed judgment on the legal meritoriousness of his arguments.
That's it. They're letting the instigator and liar pontificate.
bump
Wilson is hardly in a position to be passing judgement on anyone.
Morphed into 2 issues neither should not get lost in the shuffle.
1. Charges against Libby. That has been played out & it is what it is. Unless someone wants to investigate the 3 reporters, then it is up to the lawyers.
2. Who sent Wilson, his lies, the involvement iof the CIA.
At this point, I believe that while I know this is a major event in Libby's life, THIS is the issue of most importance. (Especially in light of Wilson's lawyer's statement)
Are you hearing this crap from Wilson's attorny
GRRRRRRRR
Wolf Attorney, yes, this is a sad day, that you and Valarie need to go party with your leftist pals and drink heavily tonight.
Wilson on FNC.
From what I've read, she was still listed with the CIA as NOC (non-official cover, meaning that her cover -- such as it was -- was as a businesswoman), although since she may have been outed by Aldrich Ames in 1994(?), she hasn't actually worked undercover since then. Sloppy bookkeeping? And the relevant statute seems to refer only to someone who has actually worked undercover outside the United States in the preceeding five years. Which she hadn't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.