Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Will Regret the Miers Withdrawal
Washington Post via Real Clear Politics ^ | 10/28/05 | E. J. Dionne Jr.

Posted on 10/28/2005 4:30:00 AM PDT by linkinpunk

Edited on 10/28/2005 6:49:30 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-378 next last
To: RockinRight

Exactly. Pass it on. Reenergize the base; tell them she would have been borked anyway even with 100% support, it simply was DOA. Disprove a lie; rip the "right wing puppet" argument straight out of the left's mouths, no more fooling moderates about the "evil right". I truly think it's vitally important to pass this message on. Please help me do so.


141 posted on 10/28/2005 6:32:40 AM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

I want to see another Scalia or Thomas on that court! No more “modern day interpretations” by a some liberal judge.

Red6


142 posted on 10/28/2005 6:33:53 AM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Killborn

I will do.


143 posted on 10/28/2005 6:39:36 AM PDT by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: xcullen

Yeah. It's amazing to see ppl still mocking the reaction to Miers, even though it has been completely vindicated. It's funny, too, that they say on the one hand, GW didn't nominate a conservative because he didn't have the votes, and yet, now this nomination gets pulled because he didn't have the votes, and they're mad about it. They seem to want Bush to get what he wants more than they want to get what they want. Kooky.


144 posted on 10/28/2005 6:41:22 AM PDT by Huck (My very first post on the Miers pick, 10/3/05, 7:33:22 AM EDT: "Bad news for us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Hate to say it but, except in directly blaming Bush, he's not wrong.

And conservatives will never be able to scream "We've been borked" ever again.

145 posted on 10/28/2005 6:41:48 AM PDT by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Huck

If Specter and Schumer are unhappy, then it must be a good thing.


146 posted on 10/28/2005 6:44:22 AM PDT by relictele (How can Hillary run the country when she couldn't manage a household of 3?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Conservatives displayed absolutely no deference to Bush when he picked someone they didn't like.

I disagree that we, the people owe any president "deference" on his choice of nominees.

The concept of "deference" applies to the SENATE. It is a political deference, meaning simply that Senators should defer their political agendas when giving advice and consent on a qualified nominee of the president.

What happened here is only business as (should be) usual in our representative democracy: if an issue sufficiently riles the people, politicians---being representatives of the people---take note.

E.J., another boneheaded, anti-intellectual piece, devoid of sound reasoning and historical and constitutional context.

147 posted on 10/28/2005 6:45:20 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
And conservatives will never be able to scream "We've been borked" ever again.

And conservatives screaming "We've been Borked" was soooooo effective in the past.

148 posted on 10/28/2005 6:47:29 AM PDT by shempy (EABOF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
"...their drive to pack the U.S. Supreme Court..."

absurd
149 posted on 10/28/2005 6:47:48 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

What many of these bots do not understand is that the natural inclination in government is for everyone to simply play nice and go along with each other. Its only when the peasants start screaming that they take notice. Does anyone really believe the Senate would have rejected her based on her non-existent qualifications if we did not speak up??????


150 posted on 10/28/2005 6:48:24 AM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

What litmus test did she fail?


151 posted on 10/28/2005 6:49:32 AM PDT by TN4Liberty (American... conservative... southern.... It doesn't get any better than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

When the libs are upset at something the President has done, you can rest assured it was the correct thing to do. :)


152 posted on 10/28/2005 6:49:49 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

you gotta love it when libs warn us that we're making a mistake. We must be doing something right!


153 posted on 10/28/2005 6:50:59 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

E.J. Dionne is always wrong, especially when he tries to give the GOP advice.


154 posted on 10/28/2005 6:51:12 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Much appreciated. Thank you so much. :)


155 posted on 10/28/2005 6:53:17 AM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2
Yup. What I said on another thread:

Why it do the Rats consider this a striking defeat for Bush/conservatives?

Yeah, nominating Miers was a boneheaded move, but it's a new day. Bush made a mistake. He fixed it. He's still The Man.

Now, the WH strategerists are smart enough to look at everything that went on with the Miers nomination as a FREE TRIAL BALLOON.

THEY know how much support there is out there---where it counts, with the people---for a top-notch, unafraid, unabashed origninalist.

Moreover, they know that THE RATS now know how much support there is out there for same.

Bush has more cards in his hands than ever!

If the stupid RINOs give him grief, he now has proof the base will turn on them, too.

If the Rats give him grief and start that crap about a nominee who "unites," he now has proof that the political capital is on the side of nominating an originalist.

If the Senate judiciary committee gives him crap over an origninalist nominee, HE knows and THEY know that this time we'll have his back.

Of course, no one on Bush Team intended this, but the fact is that the Miers nomination focused the conservative mind wonderfully. There's real power in that fact and that power is on Bush's side (so long as he gets the nominee right this time).

Now we made it up to US to get the next nominee (assuming a good one) through.

Let's roll!

156 posted on 10/28/2005 6:54:11 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
What a load of prairie pizzas. The elected Republican representatives saying answering questions about cases that may come before the court is no way equates to conservative media pundits pontificating about a nominee.

Harriet was done in by Executive Privilege.
157 posted on 10/28/2005 6:54:12 AM PDT by IamConservative (Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times will pick himself up and carry on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

"Harriet was done in by Executive Privilege."

YES!!!!!!!!!!

You have no idea how happy I am you said that. :)

ONE MORE TIME, FROM THE TOP!

"Harriet was done in by Executive Privilege."


158 posted on 10/28/2005 6:55:57 AM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

The day conservatives start taking political direction from the likes of Dionne is the day we implode. The only use this column serves is to lay out the plan of attack the liberals plan to use.


159 posted on 10/28/2005 6:56:07 AM PDT by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
And all four are secularists.

That's a lie.

I don't know about Krauthammer, but the other three are Catholics.

160 posted on 10/28/2005 6:56:39 AM PDT by B Knotts (JRB for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-378 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson