Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Will Regret the Miers Withdrawal
Washington Post via Real Clear Politics ^ | 10/28/05 | E. J. Dionne Jr.

Posted on 10/28/2005 4:30:00 AM PDT by linkinpunk

Edited on 10/28/2005 6:49:30 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

By E. J. Dionne Jr.

WASHINGTON -- The damage President Bush and the conservative movement have inflicted on their drive to pack the U.S. Supreme Court with allies will not be undone by Harriet Miers' decision to withdraw her nomination.


(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dionne; harrietmiers; regret; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-378 next last
To: irons_player

Don't ask me! Ask that guy!


61 posted on 10/28/2005 5:06:26 AM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

When the liberals were saying Meirs' pick was a repidiation of the right wing, I took notice. When she withdrew and they went nuts, I took notice. I think that speaks volumes of what they knew about her.


62 posted on 10/28/2005 5:07:02 AM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Killborn
It was a face saver for Miers benefit. That's all it was. The requests for docs that were mentioned had not yet been made, and it was the Senate defection that did the deed, and I think that stupid Ad run by No one in particular was what put it over the top.

That is way to much crap! Nobody but a professional politician would put up with it.

63 posted on 10/28/2005 5:08:21 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Conservatives Will Regret the Miers Withdrawal

First, our president brings his personal attorney out in front of the cameras and tells the world that he has found the "best, most qualified candidate in the country."

Next, our president tells everyone to "trust me."

Finally Meirs, who apparently isn't the best and most qualified candidate in the country, takes a powder.

Our president now has far less credibility and seems far less trustworthy.

His next pick? please......, who would want to be the next one? The one who wasn't good enough the last time? Will he/she be a conservative? Doubtful. It'll be a middle of the road, below the radar candidate who has been known in Washington for decades and has a strong loyalty to bush41.

Will conservatives be filled with regret?

Yes

64 posted on 10/28/2005 5:08:46 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Party_Animal
I love how all the MSM is getting freaked out because the Senate actually too out a candidate because she could not prove her qualifications. I thought that was the ONLY reason, under the constitution, that they are allowed to stop a SC nomination for?
65 posted on 10/28/2005 5:09:35 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

I didn't see anything hurtful in it.


66 posted on 10/28/2005 5:10:29 AM PDT by Huck (My very first post on the Miers pick, 10/3/05, 7:33:22 AM EDT: "Bad news for us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Now that Miers, the former Texas Lottery Commissioner, as Ann Coulter calls her, has withdrawn her nomination to the Supreme Court Bush can nominate a red-meat conservative who believes in Constitutional rule of law, the capitalist free enterprise system, in individual responsibility, personal liberty, and freedom of religion.

A real conservative will force the Democrats, who are in serious decline, to show their real colors and come out and fight against these things.

Such a fight will demonstrate to even slow learners that the once great Democrat party has turned into the mirror-image of the British Socialist Labor Party.

The Democrat party, even out of power, and having lost election after election, are still dangerous. They are like a Category 3 hurricane that has degraded to a Category 1 but that can use discord and unsettled conditions to build up into a category 3 again.

Americans should remember that the "agenda" of the Democrat party is to develop a tight ruling elite at the head of a socialist economic system that will lead the world using the United Nations as a governing vehicle.

This is Bush's opportunity to begin the battle to restore America to its pre-Roosevelt condition. Putting a dedicated Constitutionalists on the Court is a start.
67 posted on 10/28/2005 5:11:22 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

What, support unqualified friends for high office?


68 posted on 10/28/2005 5:11:33 AM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: chris1
When she withdrew and they went nuts,

They have not gone nuts! I have seen democrat nuts and They are not there yet. What I heard was mostly all true for a change. LOL! That is simply a attempt to justify what was done to Miers and it sucks air!

69 posted on 10/28/2005 5:11:48 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Now that Miers, the former Texas Lottery Commissioner, as Ann Coulter calls her, has withdrawn her nomination to the Supreme Court Bush can nominate a red-meat conservative who believes in Constitutional rule of law, the capitalist free enterprise system, in individual responsibility, personal liberty, and freedom of religion.

A real conservative will force the Democrats, who are in serious decline, to show their real colors and come out and fight against these things.

Such a fight will demonstrate to even slow learners that the once great Democrat party has turned into the mirror-image of the British Socialist Labor Party.

The Democrat party, even out of power, and having lost election after election, are still dangerous. They are like a Category 3 hurricane that has degraded to a Category 1 but that can use discord and unsettled conditions to build up into a category 3 again.

Americans should remember that the "agenda" of the Democrat party is to develop a tight ruling elite at the head of a socialist economic system that will lead the world using the United Nations as a governing vehicle.

This is Bush's opportunity to begin the battle to restore America to its pre-Roosevelt condition. Putting a dedicated Constitutionalists on the Court is a start.
70 posted on 10/28/2005 5:12:00 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Now that Miers, the former Texas Lottery Commissioner, as Ann Coulter calls her, has withdrawn her nomination to the Supreme Court Bush can nominate a red-meat conservative who believes in Constitutional rule of law, the capitalist free enterprise system, in individual responsibility, personal liberty, and freedom of religion.

A real conservative will force the Democrats, who are in serious decline, to show their real colors and come out and fight against these things.

Such a fight will demonstrate to even slow learners that the once great Democrat party has turned into the mirror-image of the British Socialist Labor Party.

The Democrat party, even out of power, and having lost election after election, are still dangerous. They are like a Category 3 hurricane that has degraded to a Category 1 but that can use discord and unsettled conditions to build up into a category 3 again.

Americans should remember that the "agenda" of the Democrat party is to develop a tight ruling elite at the head of a socialist economic system that will lead the world using the United Nations as a governing vehicle.

This is Bush's opportunity to begin the battle to restore America to its pre-Roosevelt condition. Putting a dedicated Constitutionalists on the Court is a start.
71 posted on 10/28/2005 5:12:25 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal
Putting a dedicated Constitutionalists on the Court is a start.

Amen to that.
72 posted on 10/28/2005 5:12:48 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Now that Miers, the former Texas Lottery Commissioner, as Ann Coulter calls her, has withdrawn her nomination to the Supreme Court Bush can nominate a red-meat conservative who believes in Constitutional rule of law, the capitalist free enterprise system, in individual responsibility, personal liberty, and freedom of religion.

A real conservative will force the Democrats, who are in serious decline, to show their real colors and come out and fight against these things.

Such a fight will demonstrate to even slow learners that the once great Democrat party has turned into the mirror-image of the British Socialist Labor Party.

The Democrat party, even out of power, and having lost election after election, are still dangerous. They are like a Category 3 hurricane that has degraded to a Category 1 but that can use discord and unsettled conditions to build up into a category 3 again.

Americans should remember that the "agenda" of the Democrat party is to develop a tight ruling elite at the head of a socialist economic system that will lead the world using the United Nations as a governing vehicle.

This is Bush's opportunity to begin the battle to restore America to its pre-Roosevelt condition. Putting a dedicated Constitutionalists on the Court is a start.
73 posted on 10/28/2005 5:12:56 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinite
Need a kleenex, Putz?

When out of ideas or the ability to state them clearly and convincingly, whip out the old insult, eh?

The strength of your argument is belied by the crassness of your "debate".

74 posted on 10/28/2005 5:13:57 AM PDT by MortMan (Eschew Obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
their willingness to contradict their own principles plain for all to see.

Here's where he's 100% wrong. The GOP (no to be confused with conservatives) have been selling the line that the president deserves deference, to cover up their hideous failure in the 90s, when they voted for Ginsburg and Breyer. Clearly, they should have voted no. The president is entitled to no deference according to the Constitution. The only deference he gets is the right to pick the nominees, and that's enough. A lot of conservatives are frustrated by the Senate and therefore want to circumvent and let "their" president get things done. I think that's a mistake in the long run.

75 posted on 10/28/2005 5:14:02 AM PDT by Huck (My very first post on the Miers pick, 10/3/05, 7:33:22 AM EDT: "Bad news for us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Killborn

Apologies.


76 posted on 10/28/2005 5:14:26 AM PDT by irons_player
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Personally, rather than regret, I plan to spend the next 25 years thanking my lucky stars that she is not sitting on the court making rulings that mock the Constitution with her ill conceived ideas about self determination and the appropriateness of judicial activism which she expressed in her 1993 speech.
77 posted on 10/28/2005 5:19:03 AM PDT by jackbenimble (Import the third world, become the third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

This editorial is poorly written.

1) This blogger is blending the conservative movement and the Republican party inappropriately.

2) Dionne does not understand that, while it is inappropriate for the Senate to question judge nominees about their political positions, it is the responsibility of the Senate to vet judges for experience and understanding of the responsibility to uphold the law.

3) The people of the United States of America are under no restriction regarding discussion of the polital positions of nominees.

4) This essay belongs in "Bloggers and personal".


78 posted on 10/28/2005 5:20:09 AM PDT by TaxRelief ("Conservatives are cracking down!" -- Rush Limbaugh, October 13, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
How do we plead rightous indignation when the Dems start pounding the next nominee with questions?

How about try truth instead of feigned righteous indignation?

79 posted on 10/28/2005 5:20:40 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

Little drooling E J is quaking in his Depends because if anything, the Miers saga showed that Conservatives have clout now. The Lefties have been warning of this day and building it up as the bogieman in elections for years, but they never really believed it. Now the Conservative ascendancy is real to them, and how they hate it! We will read many more of these "You'll be sorry" type columns from the Left in liberal rags throughout the country. This is the time to advance Conservative causes and policies as never before because the Left is in panic mode. Do not let up on them.


80 posted on 10/28/2005 5:22:11 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-378 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson