Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woodward: Only Minimal Damage from Plame's Outing
Larry King Live ^ | October 27, 2005 | Larry King Live

Posted on 10/27/2005 8:11:22 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn

WOODWARD: I think one of the things that's fact that hasn't come out is we talk about...

KING: Uh-oh, here it comes!

WOODWARD: No, no. And this is not even a firecracker, but it's true. They did a damage assessment within the CIA, looking at what this did that Joe Wilson's wife was outed. And turned out it was quite minimal damage. They did not have to pull anyone out undercover abroad. They didn't have to resettle anyone. There was no physical danger to anyone and there was just some embarrassment.

So people have kind of compared -- somebody was saying this was Aldridge James or Bob Hanson, big spies. This didn't cause damage.

(Excerpt) Read more at transcripts.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beltwaywarzone; cialeak; woodward
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: StarFan
Woodward really nailed Dodd. It was beautiful. Newsbusters.org has the whole thing here: http://newsbusters.org/node/2536, and below is an excerpt:

Much to Senator Chris Dodd's consternation on Thursday's Larry King Live on CNN, Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward, of Watergate fame, pointed out a fact rarely mentioned by the mainstream media -- that “most of the analysts at the CIA said that [Joseph] Wilson's findings, when he went to Niger, supported the conclusion that there was some deal with Iraq” for uranium. When Dodd started to counter Woodward, Woodward asserted that “Democrats and the Republicans all signed that report. That is a fact.” Woodward revealed that he had the report “in his pocket”and when King asked why, Woodward answered "Yes I do because I knew I might be challenged."

21 posted on 10/27/2005 8:42:09 PM PDT by hugorand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
And turned out it was quite minimal damage.

This is a typical liberal liberty with the truth.

It wasn't "minimal" damage, it was zero (as I infer from various radio accounts).

There is, of course, a very large difference between the two.

.

22 posted on 10/27/2005 8:42:38 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

I thought so as well.


23 posted on 10/27/2005 8:43:06 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hugorand

OMG. Can't wait to see the rerun in 15 minutes.


24 posted on 10/27/2005 8:44:32 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I wonder if Plame has been collecting super-spy hazardous duty pay for all these years??
25 posted on 10/27/2005 8:45:49 PM PDT by 11x62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
From Drudge:


Karl Rove, President Bush's senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, will not be charged on Friday, but would remain under investigation... Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, braced for an indictment on Friday charging him with making false statements to the grand jury... MORE...

WASH POST: Libby shopping for a white-collar criminal lawyer... MORE...

NYT: ROVE NOT TO BE CHARGED

NYT: LIBBY, TOP AIDE TO CHENEY, APPEARS LIKELY TO FACE INDICTMENT

26 posted on 10/27/2005 8:47:05 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

VIDEO here: http://thepoliticalteen.net/2005/10/27/doddwoodward/

You did not note the paper that Woodward pulled at that made Dodd look like an idiot.


27 posted on 10/27/2005 8:47:29 PM PDT by ianschwartz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Wow, that's important info-- the public hears that and the whole thing evaporates... no one got whacked.... nobody even had to leave their foreign assignment... it was essentially a non-event. Next.


28 posted on 10/27/2005 8:48:06 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
While I'm not fond of any indictments at least one good thing could come out of them, Wilson and Plame will have to testify and if either take the 5th, whoever gets indicted walks. Even if it's something like perjury they could still get called to "clarify" the "perjury".

Given an indictment of Libby or Rove, there would be absolutely no need for either Plame or Wilson to testify.

Neither would have evidence material to a charge of perjury or obstruction.

What would Plame know, for example, about what Libby heard from Cheney or told Miller? What could Wilson contribute regarding an exchange between Rove and Cooper?

29 posted on 10/27/2005 8:48:14 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
It wasn't "minimal" damage, it was zero (as I infer from various radio accounts).

There is, of course, a very large difference between the two.

But the CIA was embarrassed -- which, in their minds, constitutes "a very large difference".

30 posted on 10/27/2005 8:52:40 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
If you watch the show would you listen towards the end where Larry asks each person how or what they think will happen tomarrow. I could swear I heard isikoff say yes 1-2 indictments - And then he said Libby and 1 for the STATE DEPT. !!!!!

Here is what I found in the transcript and it does not finish Isikoffs sentence. ISIKOFF: I think Fitzgerald's going to announce something tomorrow afternoon. Tomorrow afternoon, yes.

KING: Not in the morning?

ISIKOFF: Yes, afternoon. And he'll do it himself. You know...

See, it ends with .....so something came after that? Who could it be at the State Dept. ? Karen

31 posted on 10/27/2005 8:54:08 PM PDT by KE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Woodward should talk to Larry Johnson. Johnson thinks the outing of Plame was the worst security disaster in history.


32 posted on 10/27/2005 8:55:32 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

"David Boies is a damn good lawyer."

I wish he could fill me in on how you commit perjury when there is no crime at issue.


33 posted on 10/27/2005 8:58:39 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21

"Larry, Izzy & especially Dodd were not pleased when Woodward did not pile on Rive & Libby!"

That's because Larry, Izzy and Dodd are making their living trashing Republicans.


34 posted on 10/27/2005 8:59:48 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KE

Shall do my FRiend.


35 posted on 10/27/2005 9:02:51 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 11x62

That's funny.


36 posted on 10/27/2005 9:12:03 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Janice Rogers Brown is the only High Court nominee that is acceptable to me, period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

"excellent sources"


Oh yeah! Woodward doesn't even know she wasn't covert! NOBODY WAS OUTED!! And I'm sick of this media who will not acknowledge the truth about it.


37 posted on 10/27/2005 9:15:53 PM PDT by CyberAnt (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Holy cow. Game over.


38 posted on 10/27/2005 9:19:43 PM PDT by Kryptonite (McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, DeWine, Chafee - put them in your sights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Read this


39 posted on 10/27/2005 9:20:57 PM PDT by McGavin999 (We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

He's on Larry King Live right now!

I'll post this from another thread:

On Larry King Live, Bob Woodward just gave a seminiar on the facts of this case, much to the displeasure of Chris Dodd.

When Woodward brought up the Senate Intelligence report that said Wilson lied, Dodd tried to say it didn't say what Woodward said it said and Woodward said, "All the D and R senators signed off on it, and Dodd tried to deny it again, and Woodward says, "Well, I've got it right here in my pocket so I can read it to you."

At the break, he shoved the pages over to Dodd and Dodd wouldn't take them.


40 posted on 10/27/2005 9:34:51 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson