Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers Withdraws Supreme Court Nomination
Yahoo/AP ^ | 10/27/05 | Yahoo News/AP

Posted on 10/27/2005 6:09:25 AM PDT by procomone

WASHINGTON - Harriet Miers withdrew her nomination to be a Supreme Court justice Thursday in the face of stiff opposition and mounting criticism about her qualifications.

Bush said he reluctantly accepted her decision to withdraw, after weeks of insisting that he did not want her to step down. He blamed her withdrawal on calls in the Senate for the release of internal White House documents that the administration has insisted were protected by executive privilege.

"It is clear that senators would not be satisfied until they gained access to internal documents concerning advice provided during her tenure at the White House — disclosures that would undermine a president's ability to receive candid counsel," Bush said. "Harriet Miers' decision demonstrates her deep respect for this essential aspect of the constitutional separation of powers — and confirms my deep respect and admiration for her."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: checkbreaking; crony; cronyism; miers; officemommy; patronage; search; spolissystem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 421-426 next last
To: MEGoody
And that there is no difference between the radical right and the radical left.

It's all about power.

Not power to the people but power to the elites.

181 posted on 10/27/2005 6:51:18 AM PDT by OldFriend (David Gelernter ~ American Patriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr
I hope you people who felt like the President owed you something personally are happy

Well, maybe not happy the Pres was taken to the woodshed, but pleased that this nomination was scuttled, based on the "trust me" and "she's an evangelical" justifications he tossed out, after the fact, to defend his choice. Now perhaps George Bush will defer less to Harry Reid and more to the people WHO ELECTED HIM.

About your "ballot box" comment..that is exactly what is happening here. We "whiners" went to the ballot box and elected a President who campaigned on nominating Constitutional originalists to the bench. By no stretch of anyone's imagination did Harriet Miers' have any record of jurisprudence that met that criteria.
182 posted on 10/27/2005 6:51:26 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

"Well, you may get your way, and watch the liberals take the congress back.. I am truly afraid that this attitude will get us back to another 8-12 years of Liberals controlling everything, some of you folks are either so spoiled, or so near sighed or too young to remember when every bill that passed was a socialist mandate.. Interesting times ahead fir sur.."

It takes a REPUBLICAN to increase the rate of federal government expansion the greatest it's been since the New Deal and the Depression. No Democrat can do that.

If this is what a Republican majority across the board gives us, it's not worth it.


183 posted on 10/27/2005 6:51:32 AM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: USPatriette
Some people are willing to throw the war in order to win every small battle.

If Scotus nominations are "small battles", what do you consider a large battle?

btw.... Welcome to Free Republic.

184 posted on 10/27/2005 6:51:59 AM PDT by calcowgirl (CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: procomone

I now include Rush Limbaugh, Bill Kristol and Ann Coulter in my list of people who I dismiss as having any credibility beyond the shrill and emotional.

Miers being withdrawn is acceptable to me if only upon the basis of the so-called "conservative" uproar about her as an individual nominated and Bush for nominating her.

What they've done is impower people like Democrat Senator Durbin from Illinois to now "demand" "a moderate" and people like John Kerry to use yet more nationally televised air time to bang his silly drums for liberal outrage and denigration of America for various interests he is more concerned with (like "Muslims" being "outraged" and such).

I used to enjoy a certain caustic tone from who I thought were conservatives (media personalities) as entertainment and a degree of enlightenment by pointing out the absurdities of liberalism and most Democrats' behaviors and positions, and yet now what I see is that there really ARE too many lemming-like personalities among our human population and the left is not alone in this characteristic.

Fine, so Coulter and Limbaugh are funny millionaires. They are no more conservative than my house plants are.


185 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:21 AM PDT by BIRDS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #186 Removed by Moderator

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

We can get a conservative justice without poking the Dems in the eye. I seem to remember a man by the name of john Roberts.


187 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:43 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

How exactly was she not qualified? The Constitution does not say you had to have certain prior experience to be appointed. These "qualifications" that many of you speak were instilled by lawyers for lawyers just like anything else.

I believe the only prerequisite is age, good character and competency. Not many of the early justices, before the lawyer sub-culture took hold, were judges much less attorneys.

The was the Constitution reads I am qualified and so are many of you.


188 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:46 AM PDT by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Froggie

And, who, exactly, is THAT?


189 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:51 AM PDT by BIRDS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lormand

They don't need issues you idiot, you and you nearsighted hotheads are the friggin issue.. the fracture in the fragile coalition is an opening that will cause a void that will quickly be filled with slime from the left.. Well this has to happen every 20 years or so.. it's like the damned locus.. Or the morons in the 60's.. %#@%#@


190 posted on 10/27/2005 6:54:48 AM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: USPatriette

"An absolutely jaw-dropping statement of self-congratulations."

Not at all. It is inconceivable that my few notes on FR had any effect at all, so I have no reason to congratulate myself.

What I found offensive was the seeming equivalence you were drawing between the extreme left and the extreme right.

The extreme left is extremely evil. Those now called the extreme right (aka "the center" circa 1955) are for the most part at least medium good.


191 posted on 10/27/2005 6:55:13 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: no dems

While I am not in agreement with your sentiments I must say this: Apparently you have never worked behind the scenes in a political campaign. I don't care what party or how conservative, liberal, or religious (spiritual)people may appear to be; behind the scenes, it is "down-and-dirty, cut-throat hardball".


Wrong, I have word very hard standing up with George W Bush since he ran for congress in West Texas, and lost. I have been along besiden him for years, and been very involved in campaigns, knocking doors, hundreds and hundreds of phone calls, done mail outs, given my money, so your just wrong!


192 posted on 10/27/2005 6:55:15 AM PDT by JFC (President Bush, I pray for you daily. God bless you, protect you and continue to guide you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr

Great post. I can't believe some of these people are proud of themselves.


193 posted on 10/27/2005 6:55:15 AM PDT by USPatriette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Now give us someone we can all agree on.

You mean someone YOU like. Many of the rest of us like Ms. Miers.

194 posted on 10/27/2005 6:56:10 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush and the SAPPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad

Gimme a break.

The Constitution also says the President muct be over 35 yrs old.

Do you really think every 35 yr old and over is qualified to be President?

If you do, then we have nothing more to talk about.


195 posted on 10/27/2005 6:56:23 AM PDT by Sometimes A River (Serving on a Meals-on-Wheels program is NOT a qualification for a SC nominee. Call your Senators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"It appears that Bush is saying this decision had to do with release of internal WH documents. Something no President wants to hand over to the Senate."

I hope you're not buying that spin. Do you believe that the administration never considered the Senate would ask for these documents during the vetting process? That's just a useful although pitiful excuse for the president not standing up for his nominee. It's not strategery, nor a rope-a-dope or some well thought out poker hand. He looked at his polls and the press and he blinked. If he believed in Miers enough to nominate her he should have fought for her.

196 posted on 10/27/2005 6:56:46 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Yeah, hardcore conservatives are a**holes.

Never done this on a thread before, but you deserve this...

a respectful F U

197 posted on 10/27/2005 6:56:51 AM PDT by austinite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
This was President Bush's attempt to reach out to the conservatives more

How so? Miers had no proven conservative track record, and the President must have known which possible names were favored by conservatives (i.e. JRB, Alito).
198 posted on 10/27/2005 6:56:55 AM PDT by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Frank T
If this is what a Republican majority across the board gives us, it's not worth it.

REALLY? I guess we shall see.. I hope like Hell I am wrong, after all I was wrong about the average intelligence of the FR posters.. Oh well..

199 posted on 10/27/2005 6:57:26 AM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: mak5

"Watch for Consuela Maria Callahan from the 9th Circuit."

Say it isn't so. I will never forgive the anti-Miersers if that happens. I may not forgive them as it is.


200 posted on 10/27/2005 6:57:29 AM PDT by USPatriette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 421-426 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson