Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
If it's something she did, and regrets, and overcame, then I do not care. It'll just be a part of her backstory.
History? I see many people here who can't seem to recall the last 12-24 months and countless filibusters. I want to know what the all those who erroneously claim to represent the entire base, led by Bork, Kristol, Coulter, etc. are going to do to tame the Senate...and why they didn't do it earlier?
Obviously the conservative movement made their case against Miers and obviously did a good job of it.
I would argue that a "true conservative" at least in the mold you appear to espouse, would never win an election as President. Witness Buchanan, Falwell, and even McCain in 2000. That's history. Bush ran as a compasionate Conservative, he won. It's a big tent, but Miers was very much towards the outside of the tent. Bush failed to recognize this.
I saw that too....
I wonder if this was planned. I know I'm silly.
"I think Bush is loyal but he hasn't shown signs of being extremely vindictive."
Since the President has not been vindictive toward Bill Clinton there is no reason to think he would he be vidictive toward conservatives.
Bill Kristol says NO. Or he will go back on his hunger strike. :-)
And that stuff is going to be trumpeted to the hills by the Dems for anyone remotely conservative Bush sends up next.
Opposing Miers and defeating her nomination may have been the right thing to do. But the manner in which it was done is going to come back and bite us big-time. Conservatives who are crowing about this and demanding to be given "credit" are playing right into the hands of the Dems and RINO's.
I like this guy:
Senator John Kyl - a strong conservative who would breeze through the Senate confirmation process.
From your response, I'm not sure if you agree or don't. If you think the democrats won here, I'd have to disagree.
I THINK THIS WAS A WELL PLAYED POKER HAND TO BEGIN WITH- THEY COMPLAINED MIERS DIDNT HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS, NOW THEY CANT COMPLAIN THAT BROWN DOESN'T
YAHOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
The Miers disaster was the handiwork of Andy Card, a house of mush. If Bush wants to get back on his game, he had better look to Karen Williams or Edith Jones or Michael Luttig etc.
I don't believe it will be Owen or Rogers-Brown.
As I've said, I think Miers was a decoy to draw the heavy fire from the dems. Now, Bush nominates Priscilla Owen or Janice Rogers Brown. It's hard for dems to oppose the second nominaton, especially of someone they already confirmed for the court of appeals.
Excellent work.
That's entirely up to Bush. He can cough up another mediocrity, and be abandoned by his base, or he can give his followers a nominee worth fighting for.
Just something to ponder..
Nothing to ponder at all...it really quite simple...if he's "angry at us", he and the Republican party can just be considered impotent till '08 and hurt in the wallet come election time in '06 and in '08. It would be an extremely DUMB move on his part.
Bush will commit political suicied if he nominates anything less than a solid conservative originalist after the conservative backlash.
Sorry...oxymoron.
Who got the closest: Guess time/date of Miers withdrawal???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.