Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!

Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,721-2,7402,741-2,7602,761-2,780 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: clawrence3
Well, yeah - using perfect 20/20 hindsight since he didn't know his base was going to stab him in his back, he should not have pulled Roberts as O'Connor's replacement.

Bush had total control over who he picked. Ceasar didn't have control over being stabbed or not.

Bush's pick was a bad one. If he had properly floated Miers and paid attention to the reaction, he would have never made the pick in the first place. That was his blunder and he and his advisers should know better.

I have to believe that either Bush is no longer listening to the advisers that got him elected. In fact, he may not be listening to any advisers at all beyond Andy Card and Laura Bush.

2,741 posted on 10/27/2005 1:23:13 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2723 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
If you are going to claim conservative criticism of Miers gives fodder to the left,

What part of "It was how you handled it" that you do not understand??????

2,742 posted on 10/27/2005 1:23:51 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2733 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
To: joesbucks; Miss Marple

But now he many not want to risk the hard line conservatives.

I will say this right here for all to see: if George Bush buckles to the hardliner malcontents, he will lose my support, period.

I'm sick tp death of all the bashing and trashing; I'm sick of a small group of people who NEVER WANTED HIM AS THE NOMINEE IN THE FIRST PLACE, wailing and moaning about everything he does.

If he lets you all run him into a corner, I'm done with him. And there sure as hell are more of "me" than there are of "you." I won't be the only one to go.

600 posted on 10/09/2005 2:12:05 PM EDT by Howlin

To: Howlin; Miss Marple

I will say this right here for all to see: if George Bush buckles to the hardliner malcontents, he will lose my support, period.

/Ok, I'll take your word for it. Any withdrawl will be seen as White House orchestrated. None of this she stepped aside for the good of whatever. It she withdrawls, other than death, then it was done at the will of the WH. No weasel words.

She's gotta go through the process.

810 posted on 10/09/2005 6:03:01 PM EDT by joesbucks [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

To: joesbucks

I agree.

Then we can have that "fight" everybody's been dying for, only this time we can see the "real" "true" conservatives try to tear this party up.

811 posted on 10/09/2005 6:06:04 PM EDT by Howlin [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

2,743 posted on 10/27/2005 1:24:01 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1926 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I heard an interview with him...where he was asked about his "political future"...and did he have POTUS aspirations.

He demurred, of course, but he also said that he has a "self-imposed" term limit of 2 terms...so whatever happens after that...he isn't thinking about.

Wouldn't you know that one of the GOOD ones would self-impose a term limit on himself!!


2,744 posted on 10/27/2005 1:24:08 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2735 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

I agree with you that Judge Brown would be an excellent choice.

John


2,745 posted on 10/27/2005 1:24:23 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Quoted by the BBC this time, on Wednesday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I personally don't see anything wrong with a fixed term of 18 years. It resets with each appointment, though. There is no "filling out" of a term.... It insulates them from politics (What a joke, but oh, well.) but keeps the court from being dominated by dottering old fools or nominations made exclusively of people in their early 50s.

Makes sense to me, AmishDude. Of course, this change would require a constitutional amendment.... How would you rate the prospects that Congress would ever initiate such an amendment? It would take two-thirds of both houses to agree on the amendment before it can be sent to the states for ratification. Alternatively, the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states can petition Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. But such a convention would not necessarily be limited to the business of amending the terms of members of the federal bench. People might fear such a convention might open a whole new can of worms....

Either way, Congress then decides which Mode of Ratification will be used: (1) either 3/4 of the Legislatures of the several states, or (2) 3/4 of the Conventions of the several states called for that purpose.

Congress historically has followed the first ratification route. But if they seriously wanted to "muddy up the waters," they could instruct all 50 states to call ratification conventions of their own.... That ought to slow things down -- a lot.

Sigh. It all comes back to the same problem/cause: Congress' penchant for extraconstitutional or unconstitutional exercise of its Article I powers. The Left is dedicated to strengthening the courts at the expense of the executive. I don't see that the Left in Congress would find anything particularly advantageous in limiting the terms of federal judges and justices -- i.e., the power of the courts.

Just thinking out loud.... sorry

2,746 posted on 10/27/2005 1:25:14 PM PDT by betty boop (Nature loves to hide. -- Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2654 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
How so? Please explain how this is a weapon for the moonbats.

Well I already explained this to someone else but it boils down to losing the demand for an up or down vote as the fair thing to do. It was a good line and I think helped us. I would have preferred to see her voted down by the judiciary committtee. The system would have worked and the next time around we would have had that same weapon to weild against a filibuster. However, time to move forward for all of us.

2,747 posted on 10/27/2005 1:25:24 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2698 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth; PhiKapMom

Just as I hit POST...I realized how stupid the last sentance was...

Of course, a self-imposed term limit is ON HIMSELF...duh!! lol


2,748 posted on 10/27/2005 1:25:27 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2744 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

I don't think there is damage done that won't be healed before 2006 -- I have been on flame wars on here before and after it is all done, we go back to the normal happenings.

I am a Party Officer in my County and no one I talked with liked this nomination all that well but they also supported Pres Bush. Most hoped that she would withdraw her nomination.

I don't see a big rift in my County or State of Oklahoma over this nomination. What I do see are people that want Congress to get off their duff and cut pork and for the President to nominate someone to SCOTUS we can all get behind.

This site and conservative commentators with people who call only are a microcosm of the people in the trenches -- it doesn't tell the whole story. It is like brothers and sisters fighting but when someone from outside the family picks on them they band together. If the RATs think this has done damage, bring it on and they will see how this large family of the Conservative grassroots will band together and take them down.


2,749 posted on 10/27/2005 1:26:14 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2732 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I agree with you that Judge Brown would be an excellent choice.

I just hope that when GWB announces her nomination, good sense prevails and both sides of the aisle put all the BS aside and get down to doing what's right.

<snort!>

2,750 posted on 10/27/2005 1:27:04 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (If you decide to kick the tiger in the ass...you'd better be prepared to deal with the teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2745 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Dr. Tom was one of the ones that signed the Contract for America and left after three terms. He is one of the good ones.

He will be speaking at our County Banquet on Nov 18th and I cannot wait to hear him.


2,751 posted on 10/27/2005 1:27:50 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2744 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Your knowledge of Evangelical Christianity is zilch.

Says you. I grew up in the church (both large and small) and I know what's going on. Only about 10% - 20% of people who consider themselves born again Christians really are.

I know one girl that has been "born again" about 10 different times. Each time she feels that this is the real one. It's been about 6 months so it's probably time for another one.

Most people who go to church truly believe in God but only in a cultural way. Ask them about the concept of the trinity or the role of the Holy Spirit and they'll look at you with glazed over eyes.

2,752 posted on 10/27/2005 1:28:10 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2736 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I likewise am a party officer in Kansas, and will tell you the damage to an already divided party is going to be considerable.


2,753 posted on 10/27/2005 1:29:00 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2749 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Like I said, you know zilch about Evangelical Christianity. BTW, I am a theologian and have worked on two major Bible translations.


2,754 posted on 10/27/2005 1:30:21 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2752 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

I have said this from day one of this Administration -- Andy Card is NOT my favorite person in the Administration -- never has been and never will be.

Just don't think it is a smart move to name your WH legal counsel to the SCOTUS. That in itself causes problems who ever does it IMHO.


2,755 posted on 10/27/2005 1:30:22 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2741 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc; JeffAtlanta

"Your knowledge of Evangelical Christianity is zilch."

Is it as good as Jimmy Carter's knowledge of it?


2,756 posted on 10/27/2005 1:31:10 PM PDT by flashbunny (Miers has withdrawn. You can stop spinning for her. It's ok to admit she was a bad pick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2736 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Peggy Noonan actually suggested this. When I read that article, I thought, "Nice theory. No chance." And now...I don't believe "shock" would be too strong a word.

Ann Coulter has published no articles for a month that did not focus (criticism) on Miers. One wonders what she will say now.


2,757 posted on 10/27/2005 1:31:28 PM PDT by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I have been on flame wars on here before and after it is all done, we go back to the normal happenings.

Like the Terri wars. We seem to have recovered from that pretty well... and that was damn ugly.

2,758 posted on 10/27/2005 1:32:16 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Indict all of us, while you're at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2749 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

"I know one girl that has been "born again" about 10 different times. Each time she feels that this is the real one. It's been about 6 months so it's probably time for another one."

ROTF! So true. My daughter went to a Baptist camp every year in Oklahoma. She used to tell me the very same thing. They got born again over and over because it wore off during the school year.


2,759 posted on 10/27/2005 1:32:59 PM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2752 | View Replies]

To: Irish Rose

Ann Coulter has published no articles for a month that did not focus (criticism) on Miers. One wonders what she will say now.

________

Here you go...just in:

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=9931


2,760 posted on 10/27/2005 1:33:20 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (I know my enemy. I have Cable TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2757 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,721-2,7402,741-2,7602,761-2,780 ... 3,421-3,436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson