Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/26/2005 4:36:15 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: LS; TXBSAFH; Conservative Coulter Fan; Sam the Sham; Soul Seeker; TAdams8591; Pharmboy; ...

welcome to the dark side...


2 posted on 10/26/2005 4:39:16 PM PDT by flashbunny (What is more important: Loyalty to principles, or loyalty to personalities?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Welcome aboard. We could use every man we can get on the battlefield.


3 posted on 10/26/2005 4:39:18 PM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

I concur.


4 posted on 10/26/2005 4:39:21 PM PDT by Bahbah (Tony Schaffer is a hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS
Having seen you post on Miers threads earlier, I'm glad to see that you have actually considered the available evidence--instead of just making some who-else-you-gonna-vote-for decision.

It takes guts, my friend.
5 posted on 10/26/2005 4:42:02 PM PDT by Das Outsider (What this tagline needs is more cowbell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Elitist sexist DU troll!


6 posted on 10/26/2005 4:42:34 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS
How's it feel to be one of the ((unappeasables?))
7 posted on 10/26/2005 4:42:38 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

wow....it takes a big person to write such a vanity, but you've shown yourself to be intellectually honest. welcome aboard! ignore the flames.....


10 posted on 10/26/2005 4:44:05 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

You ignorant fool!

12 posted on 10/26/2005 4:44:43 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS; flashbunny; thoughtomator; Bahbah; Das Outsider
Harriet Miers and IOLTA
14 posted on 10/26/2005 4:45:39 PM PDT by caryatid (All good things which exist are the fruits of originality. [John Stuart Mill])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Those moderates among us (i.e., uncommitted conservatives, lukewarm Jim Jeffords, and RINOs) have been assuring us that she has this (mythological) conservative background, but the reports keep breaking about her supporting affirmative action, abortion, gay rights, and so forth that presumably destroy one of the core reasons some were pushing her nomination in the first place.


15 posted on 10/26/2005 4:46:10 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (One of the greatet conservative accomplishments would be the undoing of FDR’s big government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Unghh.


16 posted on 10/26/2005 4:47:32 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Frankly, I haven't been paying all that much attention the past few days (R/L intrudes), but now that I have returned to reviewing the Miers nomination, I believe I am in the process of joining you, LS.


17 posted on 10/26/2005 4:47:36 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS
Bush has been very right on many issues (GWOT, Afghanistan, Iraq, tax cuts, appointing Bolton, etc.) but he has also been dismally wrong on many others (spending, borders/immigration, growing Federal Govt., supporting the re-election of RINOs, etc.).

It is our "duty," as he himself likes to say, to let him know when he is wrong, loud and clear.

18 posted on 10/26/2005 4:49:29 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

I had a similar transition. I don't think she's a female Souter, though. I consider her to be more of an empty chair. And I believe she will go along to get along. An O'Connor with a head start.


19 posted on 10/26/2005 4:49:54 PM PDT by Petronski (The name "cyborg" to me means complete love and incredible fun. I'm filled with joy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

This 1993 speech has stopped my waffeling between "wait and see and against".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/documents/miers/EWDSpeech.pdf

Put me "all in" as an anti-Miers unappeasable.


21 posted on 10/26/2005 4:50:17 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (In DC, Pork is what's for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS
Reading all the welcomes it reads like alcoholics anonymous...

Hi, I'm ____________, and I was a Miers Lover.

24 posted on 10/26/2005 4:51:32 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS
I like your style. Well said.

LVM

25 posted on 10/26/2005 4:53:00 PM PDT by LasVegasMac ("God. Guts. Guns. I don't call 911." (bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

I agree, as a very conservative prolife evangelical conservative, I've been supportive of the Miers nomination because I support President Bush in this time of war and I think it's time for a conservative evangelical on the Supreme Court. However, now I am very concern about what she said about abortion in the 1993 speech, and I will not support someone who is pro-choice or pro-abortion.


28 posted on 10/26/2005 4:56:31 PM PDT by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

President Bush should have called you first!


32 posted on 10/26/2005 4:59:02 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Maybe those that support Meirs, by stating she brought forward Roberts, should think that maybe they will both turn the court leftward?...That is frightening. IOW, we are really in a situation of trust with the first pick, the second should be someone that is a high likelihood of being a strict constructionist.


36 posted on 10/26/2005 5:03:13 PM PDT by jeremiah (People wake up, the water is getting hot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson