Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Suzette Boler had received permission to take off work the week leading up to her husband's departure.

The article says nothing about whether she had received permission to take off work for the day after her husband's departure.

There's a possibility that she took the week off and then tried to call out sick for the extra day. That's an absolute no-no for a lot of companies.

10 posted on 10/26/2005 3:47:31 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

I noted the mention of taking time to see him off and also not showing up the day after he had left. It seemed to me that she might have been pushing the limits a bit. I don't want to see a service member's family put-upon unfairly. I don't want to see some lady try to milk an excuse to the point of absurdity either. I think you've got a good chance of touching on the issue that actually cost her the job.


20 posted on 10/26/2005 3:51:10 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

And exactly how far should a company go to accomodate a part time employee? Seems like they've been giving her plenty of time off in the past. This may have been the last straw.


23 posted on 10/26/2005 3:52:32 PM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
This paragraph explains things a little further:

Boler recalled being asked, not ordered, to start back at her job Oct. 17, the day after her husband left. She told her bosses that she would try to return that day but if she could not, she would definitely be back Oct. 18, she said.

But on the afternoon of Oct. 17, she received a call from work telling her to come in the following day and get her things because she was being fired. Her pink slip said the reason was she failed to show up for work Oct. 17, a Monday. "If I had even an inkling that I would be fired for not coming in Monday, I would have been there," she said.

So if she's telling the truth, it looks like the company was a bit harsh on her. Or it could be that she was a crappy employee and they were looking for an excuse to get rid of her.

26 posted on 10/26/2005 3:54:28 PM PDT by DGray (http://nicanfhilidh.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Or maybe she said she was coming back on Monday, and didn't show. But came in on Tuesday.

And it could be she was the employee from hell too (OK, can you tell I've been a manager ;))


38 posted on 10/26/2005 4:11:24 PM PDT by najida (I've found the last dragon, now I need to figure out what to do with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
There's a possibility that she took the week off and then tried to call out sick for the extra day. That's an absolute no-no for a lot of companies.

That's true...BUT...Did they have to call her up and leave a message to pick her things up? If there were other issues, they should have handled those at the time. You don't wait until her spouse is deployed and use that absense (time frame) as the excuse for whatever other reasons they had. If they were waiting for an excuse to fire her, they picked a bad one. Any bad publicity they earn on this one, they deserve.

106 posted on 10/26/2005 8:00:55 PM PDT by World'sGoneInsane (LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN, LET NO ONE FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson