Society Becomes Stranger and Stranger (left wing activists seek to avoid "couple-ism")

The Christian Civic League of Maine ^ | 10/25/05

[SittinYonder]

how can lesbian fisting NOT be couple-ism

Now that's funny!

[cardinal4]

Someone has to 'catch', let's see gays avoid the gender term there...

Now that made me laugh! What dopes these "radical activists" are!

[little jeremiah]

Moral Absolutes Ping.

These people are seriously mentally and spiritually ill and if allowed to, they will destroy our country, and any other counrties they infect. Their phantasmagorical psychotic world view needs to be shut up, tied up, stuffed in the closet, and defeated in every way. Unfortunately many of these sick fools teach in institutions of higher learning and are infecting young people with this poison.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.

[kstewskis]

these people are seriously ill and far removed from reality...

[i.l.e.]

These people are seriously mentally and spiritually ill and if allowed to, they will destroy our country, and any other counrties they infect

In Sylvia Browne's Book of paranormal definitions she has lots to say about the DARK SIDE. The dark side is in those who have turned their backs on God. Those affected persons seek to destroy the light in everyone else around them. The Dark Side can't exist in the light and so it needs to extinguish all light in order to survive.

This is the GLBT agenda - to destroy all normalcy so that they can live happily ever after, in public, without recrimination and without negative feedback.

Go Fred...

[TenaciousZ]

I thought this was going to be a story about discrimination against single people

Me too; I was all set to wail against this newly perceived oppression. But as it is, what gives? Two-person-pairs are exhibiting an unfavorable phenomenon if they are behaving in a manner that makes other two-person-pairs uncomfortable? I give up.

[denydenydeny]

In the words of one radical activist: “I was blind to racism, ageism, sexism, couple-ism, and in general, all of the ways that people are oppressed…”

And it was double-plus ungood.

[Heyworth]

Tragically, many psychologists and sociologists have noted that even in same-sex “marriages,” both partners take on heterosexual gender roles

I'm just trying to figure out why the word "tragically" is in this sentence. Is it tragic that scientists have noted this phenomenom? Is it tragic that "even" in same-sex marriages the partners take on gender roles (this implies that it's equally tragic in heterosexual marriages), or is it tragic that same-sex couples take on these roles (which hardly seems to matter--once you have a same-sex couple, who cares which one's on the bottom or doing the dishes).

[reformedliberal]

so that they can live happily ever after, in public, without recrimination and without negative feedback.

But they cannot, even within their own communities. These are the folks from whom we have the term *drama queen*. They are never happy. Nothing lasts forever. *Public* is where they parade their hysteria. They are full of recrimination for each other and unsolicited negative feedback.

I have known many of both biological genders, back forty years ago and right this moment. Not one is stable. Relationships I once thought of as * old marrieds* turn out to be full of insecurity and fraud.

It is truly sad what these lifestyles do to people. It is just like the worst cases of heterosexual spousal abuse.

[muir_redwoods]

How is it my problem that gays' behavior offends gays? Just how guilty am I supposed to be for the flaws of others?

[Bahbah]

society is becoming increasingly confused with regard to sexual morality.

I'm not. Have I lost touch with society? Girl/guy, that sort of thing seems to work.

[little jeremiah]

I agree. It is fueled by envy of and rebellion towards God, so they want to destroy everything He has created and the laws He has given. It is truly a war between good and evil.

[spinestein]

[In other words, same-sex marriage is good as long as it is not like real marriage, which is bad, because it is patriarchal and oppressive and involves sex roles.]



How foolish of me to waste 10 years of my life playing the "role" of the "patriarchal and oppressive" husband. I didn't realize that I was doing something so wrong, especially at sex, as treating my wife like a wife.

Consider me repentant.

[GimpySadan]

In the words of one radical activist: “I was blind to racism, ageism, sexism, couple-ism, and in general, all of the ways that people are oppressed…”

How about "stupid-ism"? Is that still fair game?

[RunningWolf]

both partners take on heterosexual gender roles. That is, one person will play a female role and the other will play a male role

They needed psychologists and sociologists to see and notate this phenomenom? DUH, I saw it lots when I lived in the bay area.

Wolf

[DugMac]

The new terms are to be "Pitcher" & "Catcher"

uh ooh that would be sportsism!

[Lindykim]

When the need (agenda) is social destruction, who better to unleash upon society than an army of invidiously envious, gluttonous homosexual orks?

[MrBambaLaMamba]

LMAO+

You're a gas.

[little jeremiah]

Orcs is right. And leftist judicial activists are Nazgul. We all need to follow the example of Frodo and Sam.

[NYer]

Since marriage is thought to be an outmoded “patriarchal” institution, taking on gender roles within a same-sex marriage is to be avoided. In other words, same-sex marriage is good as long as it is not like real marriage, which is bad, because it is patriarchal and oppressive and involves sex roles.

Next phase of the homosexual agenda - rid the world of "couples". They've destroyed so many good English words by their deceiptful lifestyle - "gay" used to mean fun loving, "rainbow" used to be a symbol from God that He would never inlict another flood ... now "couple" must be banished, according to their agenda. Where does it end?

Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list