The Postal Service can't stop delivery even if it suspects a package clearly marked as coming from a retailer contains untaxed cigarettes, said Postal Service spokesman Gerry McKiernan. "There could be souvenirs in the package. We don't know because we can't see inside the package," he said.
1 posted on
10/25/2005 6:59:10 AM PDT by
SheLion
To: Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; MeeknMing; steve50; Cantiloper; metesky; kattracks; ...
Still safe with US Mail Delivery!
2 posted on
10/25/2005 7:00:32 AM PDT by
SheLion
(Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
To: SheLion
How about lower cig taxes and people will buy them from the corner grocery again...
4 posted on
10/25/2005 7:05:00 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: SheLion
"States lose more than $1 billion a year in tax revenue from Internet tobacco sales,...."
How does a state loose revenue? Are they somehow entitled to the earnings of others, even before the money is earned? What is the definition of slavery?
5 posted on
10/25/2005 7:05:26 AM PDT by
CSM
(When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
To: SheLion
"Internet cigarette junk food traffickers are increasingly using the federal mail system to distribute their wares," Spitzer said. He said the Postal Service "clearly" has the authority to refuse to deliver cigarettes snacks to individual smokers snackers.
6 posted on
10/25/2005 7:06:23 AM PDT by
umgud
(Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
To: SheLion
Eliot Spitzer is one scary man.
7 posted on
10/25/2005 7:08:32 AM PDT by
Pondman88
To: SheLion
Anyone want to make a bet on how long before cigerettes and other tobacco products are illegal? I say 10 years or less.
To: SheLion
I always thought congress had the power to regulate interstate congress, not a megalomaniac attorney general from a failed northeastern state.
11 posted on
10/25/2005 7:11:07 AM PDT by
MortMan
(Eschew Obfuscation)
To: SheLion
We don't know because we can't see inside the package
It's just a matter of time before Congress feels the need to start scanning packages in the hopes of finding something taxable.
Who cares what's streaming over the borders, we want those frackin' tax revenues!
17 posted on
10/25/2005 7:14:36 AM PDT by
visualops
(www.visualops.com)
To: SheLion
"There could be souvenirs in the package. We don't know because we can't see inside the package,"...yet.
22 posted on
10/25/2005 7:17:00 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(If you decide to kick the tiger in the ass...you'd better be prepared to deal with the teeth.)
To: SheLion
This jerk is interferring with the interstate commerce. He is prohibiting the interstate sales and delivery of a legal product and the courts should shoot this down.
The again, I'm sure our politically charged courts will discover a penumbra floating around Saturn that allows another chunk of our freedom being subverted by a fascist attorney general.
27 posted on
10/25/2005 7:21:08 AM PDT by
sergeantdave
(Member of Arbor Day Foundation, travelling the country and destroying open space)
To: SheLion
If Spitzer is so intent on wiping out deliveries of cigarettes to regular citizens, he should start with the state's prison system. When I retired two years ago, inmates were allowed to buy cigarettes through facility commissaries. At that time, I was under the impression that inmates paid no tax on the tobacco products they bought. Although they weren't allowed to smoke on the dorms, they were able to smoke outside the buildings. According to the departmental directive #4911 dated August 16, 2005, they were still allowed to receive up to two cartons of cigarettes a month from visitors either through the mail or on visits. Is Spitzer going to crack down on the delivery of cigarettes that arrive at facilities through the regular post office? He wants to be Governor so bad, he should start cleaning up in the prison system before he goes after John Q. Public.
30 posted on
10/25/2005 7:36:05 AM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
To: SheLion
Looks like it's fedex then.
34 posted on
10/25/2005 7:44:22 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: SheLion
Isn't "under-taxes cigarettes" an oxymoron?
42 posted on
10/25/2005 8:14:33 AM PDT by
JoeGar
To: SheLion
How can a guy in New York stop interstate commerce in 49 other states?
I don't understand how that is Constitutional.
57 posted on
10/25/2005 9:34:30 AM PDT by
hattend
(Rum and Coke, please!)
This is pure crap.
Harassment. Discrimination. Invasion of privacy.
WHY do we smokers keep right on taking it again and again?!
74 posted on
10/25/2005 7:57:43 PM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson