Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Press Outraged Over Staged Flagraising
Transterrestrial.com ^ | 10/16/05 | Rand Simberg

Posted on 10/16/2005 10:38:47 AM PDT by StoneGiant

Press Outraged Over Staged Flagraising

March 3rd, 1945

IWO JIMA (Routers) Controversy has erupted among the press corps in the last few days as news has spread that the now-famous picture of the "victorious" flag raising over Iwo Jima a couple weeks ago was staged. Many believe that, as the huge number of casualties mounted in the ill-fated and pointless invasion of this tiny island, the Roosevelt administration, desperate for a bit of pro-war propaganda, arranged to have the photo taken for dissemination to the world's news services.

It has been revealed that the picture was actually of a "recreation" of an earlier flag raising of a much smaller flag, though even that event has now been cast into doubt by the apparent attempt to mislead the press.

There is abundant evidence that the picture was not only unspontaneous, but orchestrated on orders from higher ups.

"None of the men in the picture actually carried the flag to the top," one reporter noted. "It was brought up by a lieutenant in charge, probably at White House orders." In addition, none of the men in the picture had even been injured in the fighting to that point.

The latest propaganda ploy from the administration comes in the midst of doubts about the war strategy, with many thinking this latest bloody adventure particularly misguided. Several thousand Marines have died already in the invasion, and many more have been injured, many losing limbs. Moreover, despite the "victory" implied by the "flag raising," the brave Japanese continue to resist in caves dug deep into the volcanic rock of the doughty little island, with continuing "Allied" casualties. One Republican staffer on the Hill declared that it was Roosevelt's attempt to prematurely declare "major combat operations over," when it was clear that the Japanese were going to continue to fight on to the last man.

Beyond the distaste at what now seems an obvious public-relations ploy, some military strategists argue that the Iwo Jima invasion wasn't worth the cost in resources and blood, or even necessary at all, since the only reason the island is desired is as an auxiliary air base for emergency landings of "Allied" bombers attacking the Japanese homeland.

Some of the anti-war groups are particularly outraged. "We've killed tens of thousands of Japanese soldiers, and several thousand of our own, just so we can save the lives of a few American air crews while they kill hundreds of thousands of helpless Japanese civilians," read a press release from one of the more prominent groups. It continued, "Now we find the Roosevelt administration attempting to cover up its criminal actions by staging events meant to hide the fact that we're losing this cruel war, with massive casualties on all sides."

The White House, of course, attempts to defend its actions. A spokesman points out that no claims have been made that fighting was over, and that the photo was a depiction of a real event that had occurred shortly before, but not been captured by the cameras. He also noted that Mount Suribachi was in fact taken that day, and had not been relinquished since.

This does not satisfy critics in the press or the anti-war movement, however.

"It's important to demonstrate the perfidy and mendacity of this administration now," said one leading spokesman, "before it becomes fixed in the mind of the public as an American 'victory,' or something to be admired and emulated in the future. If we don't set the record straight now, who knows how history will record it? For all we know, they'll decide to put up a bronze statue in Arlington to commemorate it, or something."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: flagraising; hypocrisy; iwojima; press; staging
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2005 10:38:48 AM PDT by StoneGiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Thanks for posting this - it is a prime example of what WWII would have been like with today's press corps. D-Day? Horrific!


2 posted on 10/16/2005 10:41:24 AM PDT by The Right Stuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Hahaha.....biting satire.


3 posted on 10/16/2005 10:42:30 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Right Stuff
...what WWII would have been like with today's press corps...

D-Day would have the invasion of the US.

4 posted on 10/16/2005 10:44:06 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

The Pacific War is a QUAGMIRE! US out now!


5 posted on 10/16/2005 10:45:55 AM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Sad but very funny. Leftists can't wait to surrender and be beheaded just to score points and would blame Bush for that outcome too.


6 posted on 10/16/2005 10:45:59 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Ah, fooled me! This is satire! That's what I get for watching football and posting on FR at the same time!

This is good!


7 posted on 10/16/2005 10:48:28 AM PDT by Theresawithanh (I support President Bush, and I support our troops!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Great satire! Another headline might read:

PEARL HARBOR BOMBED
Why Do They Hate Us?


8 posted on 10/16/2005 10:53:58 AM PDT by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

sadly, we all know too damn well this is the way today's MSM would've treated this story...


9 posted on 10/16/2005 10:54:25 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Great find for Satire and to Expose the Left for what they are; anit-American, America hating, cowards. I guess the best term for them is Quislings. May they all meet the same fate as the original Quisling.


10 posted on 10/16/2005 10:55:46 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

In a not-so-funny aside, our regional newspaper refers to WWII veterans as "survivors."


11 posted on 10/16/2005 11:00:21 AM PDT by aspidistra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
You had me till I saw "Routers".
12 posted on 10/16/2005 11:03:01 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
D-Day would have the invasion of the US.

And the Germans holding the beaches of France would be insurgents.

13 posted on 10/16/2005 11:04:47 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
sadly, we all know too damn well this is the way today's MSM would've treated this story...

Not with a democrat in the WH. The MSMedia is a political arm of the socialist democrat party.
14 posted on 10/16/2005 11:09:54 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
World War Two war protestors from Mass. Actually protesting the lend-lease bill that helped England.
15 posted on 10/16/2005 11:11:37 AM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

And if true, we would not be here.


16 posted on 10/16/2005 11:30:30 AM PDT by Boazo (From the mind of BOAZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
"And the Germans holding the beaches of France would be insurgents."

And one man's "insurgent" is another man's "freedom fighter"!

17 posted on 10/16/2005 11:32:35 AM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

A well done piece...


18 posted on 10/16/2005 11:32:39 AM PDT by pickrell (Old dog, new trick...sort of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb
World War Two war protestors from Mass. Actually protesting the lend-lease bill that helped England.

You must mean the Soviet Union, don't you?

19 posted on 10/16/2005 11:53:52 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Intelligent Design is to evolution what the Swift Boat Vets were to the Kerry campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
Nope, because FDR was as big a socialist as ever walked the earth. If there had been a republican Pres in charge however, todays MSM would depict it exactly how it is written!
20 posted on 10/16/2005 12:01:02 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson