Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: syriacus
"..demanding an up-or-down vote>>."

Perhaps you're confused, Meirs is not the subject of a filibuster, which is of course what both Kristol and Krauthammer were referring to.

51 posted on 10/11/2005 6:12:27 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Pietro

Very diplomatic of you!


65 posted on 10/11/2005 6:18:27 AM PDT by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Pietro
Perhaps you're confused, Meirs is not the subject of a filibuster, which is of course what both Kristol and Krauthammer were referring to.

LOL. I'm not confused at all. (Thanks for your concern about my mental state.)

The underlying question is whether people can block the President's nominee. Both Krauthammer and Kristol felt the President's nominees deserved a vote.

67 posted on 10/11/2005 6:18:44 AM PDT by syriacus (Harriet Miers deserves hearings and an up/down vote, not rocks thrown by "Harriet's Harriers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson