Skip to comments.
Miers Remorse: Conservatives are right to be skeptical
http://www.opinionjournal.com ^
| 10/10/05
| JOHN FUND
Posted on 10/09/2005 9:29:32 PM PDT by BCrago66
I have changed my mind about Harriet Miers. Last Thursday, I wrote in OpinionJournal's Political Diary that "while skepticism of Ms. Miers is justified, the time is fast approaching when such expressions should be muted until the Senate hearings begin. At that point, Ms. Miers will finally be able to speak for herself."
But that was before I interviewed more than a dozen of her friends and colleagues along with political players in Texas. I came away convinced that questions about Ms. Miers should be raised now--and loudly--because she has spent her entire life avoiding giving a clear picture of herself. "She is unrevealing to the point that it's an obsession," says one of her close colleagues at her law firm.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: johnfund; miers; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-163 next last
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
141
posted on
10/10/2005 3:02:15 AM PDT
by
maryz
To: maryz
You're welcome.
-good times, G.J.P. (Jr.)
142
posted on
10/10/2005 3:04:03 AM PDT
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
To: msnimje
To: nwrep
Every one wants a paper trail!! How true! Indeed, everyone "thinks" they would like to know everything and anything about the ultimate results of ANY decision they make! The selection of SC Justice is no different!
144
posted on
10/10/2005 3:14:08 AM PDT
by
ExSES
(the "bottom-line")
To: Betaille
No. I will still vote and vote Republican. I realize that the Dems are far worse. However, many conservatives that are less politically involved will be dejected by this and stay home.
I don't believe in rewarding incompetence. If the GOP screws up I will vote for the opposition. Preferably, another Republican, or conservative; but, if none is available then a Democrat. It will hurt for a few years; but, then come the next election we will have a fresh batch of new waggly tailed Republican conservatives who are ready to actually do more then give ground. The only way to get rid of RINOs is to vote them out of office, and until we do that, we deserve exactly what we get.
145
posted on
10/10/2005 3:40:17 AM PDT
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: onyx
You bet she's a Southerner, which is better than any damned yankee.
Like Clinton and Carter????????
146
posted on
10/10/2005 3:51:18 AM PDT
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: eleni121
What has led you folks to conclude that Harriet is a Proverbs 31 lady?
To: BCrago66
Reactions to her from her former colleagues were mixed. Craig McDaniel, a liberal council member, praises her ability to get along with diverse groups of people and tells the Dallas Voice, a gay newspaper, "This is as good as we would ever get out of a Republican administration." Jerry Bartos, a conservative council colleague, rated her effectiveness at "zero" and called her "the consummate loner." But Sharon Boyd, a longtime friend and GOP activist, says many conservatives resented her solely because she had remained a Democrat until 1988. Ms. Boyd calls Ms. Miers's record on the council "very conservative." Yet when pressed for examples, she could only offer Ms. Miers's opposition to civil unions for gays and support for a constitutional amendment against flag burning. On other issues, Ms. Miers's record is one of initially supporting a conservative position and then abandoning it. No comment.
To: Betaille
I read that Harriet Miers donated $1000 to Hillary's campaign in 2000. 'Nuff said.
149
posted on
10/10/2005 5:05:50 AM PDT
by
naden25
(If you can't feed, clothe, or house yourself.....don't have kids!)
To: BCrago66
Republican Presidents, as Frum mentioned, picked 7 of the 9 Justices, so why worry? END SARCASM!
To: BCrago66
Correction: Mr. Fund instead of Mr. Frum.
To: GarySpFc
It's Leondard Leo, and he is not the President of the Federalist Society at the moment. He is on leave from the Society and is working for the White House (
link).
Leo's endorsement (1) is not representative of the opinion of the Society as a whole and (2) does not change the fact that this nominee and this President are actively marginalizing the most influential conservative legal society in America.
152
posted on
10/10/2005 5:53:40 AM PDT
by
bourbon
(It's the target that decides whether terror wins.)
To: bourbon
(that is, if she even knows what FR is). One of those blogs out on the internets.
153
posted on
10/10/2005 6:51:36 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: onyx
You bet she's a Southerner, which is better than any damned yankee. You would take Sheila Jackson Lee over William F. Buckley?
154
posted on
10/10/2005 6:55:46 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: BCrago66
155
posted on
10/10/2005 7:22:28 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: Betaille
I don't think many conservative voters will stay at home.
I DO think they will lack the enthusiasm & passion to persuade their less conservative/less politically inclined neighbors and friends to vote.
And that is deadly in a society which saw Kerry come within a few percentage points of beating GWB!
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Perhaps what we need is a constitutional amendment so that the President appoints the SC judges without interference. [just some irony]
Or, perhaps we need to take issues and rulings out of the hands of the SCOTUS through constitutional amendment.
Or, perhaps we need to live with the fact that thinking independently will always be a mixed blessing, and always at war (and threatened by) the lockstep society that always pulls the straight ticket lever (or punches the straight ticket chad) for the so-called Democratic Party.
157
posted on
10/10/2005 9:53:40 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
To: msnimje
Can someone give me a single word that sums up this sentence? Supercalifragilisticexpialadocius
Here's three more: she's a souterfraud.
158
posted on
10/10/2005 12:17:29 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: goodnesswins
NOW, how do YOU know THAT? Sheesh. Well, in just one week, she's already become one big, embarrassing mess for BushCo.
159
posted on
10/10/2005 12:33:09 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: bourbon
160
posted on
10/10/2005 1:51:30 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(double Bot rations all round...we're gonna need them)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson