Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOXNEWS Poll: Rice, Giuliani, McCain look strong.
Fox News Poll | 10/5/05

Posted on 10/05/2005 8:39:35 PM PDT by WatchYourself

Interesting Poll by FOXNews on 2008 elections and such, especially regarding Condoleezza Rice.

Clinton still clear frontrunner for Dem nomination with 44% Support from Party

Giuliani still in lead with 26%, with McCain at 23% and Rice at 18%. Allen barely coming in at 2% despite recent pushes by some activists.

In head to head match-ups, Giuliana leads Clinton by double digits, 50-39, wile taking 20% of DEMs and losing just 8% of REPS to Clinton and a 16 point advantage with INDs.

McCain has virtually the same numbers as Giuliani. (49-38)

But Condoleezza Rice has the strongest support from Republicans, garnering an 84% Definite vote from the party (compared to 82% and 81% respectively for Giuliani and McCain). But she trails Clinton because she is also the most heavily opposed Republican by Democrats. She gains just 10% of the DEM vote (compared to over 20% for Giuliani and McCain). She also loses the IND vote to Clinton, thus leaving her currently trailing 46-43%.

According to this poll, no other Democrat can take out any of the top 3 Republicans, as Gore, Kerry, and Edwards all lose hypothetical match-ups to Rice, Giuliani, and McCain.

Also:

Not surprisingly, Giuliani was rated as the most "Strong and Decisive Leader" Garnering a 65% Yes to 20% No.

He was trailed by McCain (56-23%), Rice (55-31%), Bush (51-46%) and Hillary (51-42%).


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008polls; allen2008; fox; giuliani; guiliani2008; hillary2008; mccain2008; poll; president; rice; rice2008; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 10/05/2005 8:39:43 PM PDT by WatchYourself
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself
When it is all said and done I doubt any of these three will be left standing. I hope that the nominee is going to be a governor. I hope, but not bets would be for Barbour.
2 posted on 10/05/2005 8:41:41 PM PDT by Sthitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself

Well too bad I don't really want any of those three to be the GOP nominee!

Good to know though that Hillary won't be the unbeatable candidate the Dems hope she'd be.


3 posted on 10/05/2005 8:42:18 PM PDT by RockinRight (Why are there so many RINOs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Why is it people get so stupid once they become associated with the STATE DEPT?


4 posted on 10/05/2005 8:43:29 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want yo"ur opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself

If people think the Miers nomination is an ugly topic at FR, wait till Giuliani is the frontrunner.


5 posted on 10/05/2005 8:44:17 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: stocksthatgoup
"Why is it people get so stupid once they become associated with the STATE DEPT?"


LOL I'm dying here :)
too funny
7 posted on 10/05/2005 8:45:41 PM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself
. But she trails Clinton because she is also the most heavily opposed Republican by Democrats. She gains just 10% of the DEM vote...so a Black female does poorest with the self-proclaimed party of the poor and downtrodden - what a bunch of hypocrites......
8 posted on 10/05/2005 8:49:26 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself

Nobody wants McCain. Not a single republican anywhere.


9 posted on 10/05/2005 8:50:21 PM PDT by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I couldn't ever vote for McCain simply based on the fact that he is a pushover.

Despite Giuliani's social views, I think the most important issues are going to be 1)National Security 2)Foreign Policy/WOT and 3)Economic Growth.

His leadership capablities and willingness to finish the War on Terror is essential and invaluable. No President has had any impact on Abortion/Gay Marriage or any other "hot button" issue.

As for Rice. She is a hardcore libertarian-Republican. She is an extreme economic conservative, a heavy states-rights advocate, a major 2nd amendment defender and so on. And as for abortion, she opposes Partial Birth and federal funding of the procedure (so, whatever flaws "mildly-pro-choice" has with it). Not to mention her Foreign Policy Experience...


10 posted on 10/05/2005 8:53:11 PM PDT by WatchYourself
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sthitch

A poll this early is based almost entirely on name recognition and doesn't tell us very much. George W. Bush wasn't even on the radar screen at this point in 1997, and a poll of Democratic contenders in 2001 would have shown Al Gore as the front-runner and John Kerry as nothing more than a limp-wristed Herman Munster from Massachusetts.


11 posted on 10/05/2005 9:00:21 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself

Rudy Giuliani will never be elected, regardless of what the "hot-button" issues are in 2008. He's got way too much dirt in his past, and some of his actions as mayor of New York could best be described as "criminal" in nature.


12 posted on 10/05/2005 9:02:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself

Can you imagine the Guilianni handling a Supreme Court nominee.We would have a baby killing Gay marriage supporter for sure.


13 posted on 10/05/2005 9:04:54 PM PDT by Blessed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
George W. Bush wasn't even on the radar screen at this point in 1997,

Nonsense, he was the leader in the polls at this time in 1997.

14 posted on 10/05/2005 9:07:55 PM PDT by Phocion ("Protection" really means exploiting the consumer. - Milton Friedman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
so a Black female does poorest with the self-proclaimed party of the poor and downtrodden

That's because Condi refuses to act poor and downtrodden like the commicRATs believe she must to be a real black female.

15 posted on 10/05/2005 9:07:58 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Osama Bin Laden Al Khanzier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

so now Rudy is a "criminal" too. well, at least you've moved on from telling us he's short and had no hair as reasons why he should be disqualified as a candidate.


16 posted on 10/05/2005 9:11:38 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

or, and let's not forget your "he speaks with a lisp" issue.


17 posted on 10/05/2005 9:12:21 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

They call it "Foggy Bottom syndrome".


18 posted on 10/05/2005 9:14:04 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Check out Post #242 on this thread . . .

Click Here

I find it very interesting that 9/11 basically made so many people forget that Rudy Giuliani was an absolute @sshole who couldn't have won a Presidential election if he were running against a pile of rocks.

19 posted on 10/05/2005 9:15:39 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Phocion

That's very interesting. I stand corrected on that -- but I'm pretty sure Bush wasn't even a serious candidate (at least not from a public standpoint) until 1998.


20 posted on 10/05/2005 9:18:51 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson