Posted on 10/05/2005 8:08:18 PM PDT by FairOpinion
The Senate defied the White House yesterday and voted to set new limits on interrogating detainees in Iraq and elsewhere, underscoring Congress's growing concerns about reports of abuse of suspected terrorists and others in military custody.
Forty-six Republicans joined 43 Democrats and one independent in voting to define and limit interrogation techniques that U.S. troops may use against terrorism suspects, the latest sign that alarm over treatment of prisoners in the Middle East and at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is widespread in both parties. The White House had fought to prevent the restrictions, with Vice President Cheney visiting key Republicans in July and a spokesman yesterday repeating President Bush's threat to veto the larger bill that the language is now attached to -- a $440 billion military spending measure.
But last night, 89 senators sided with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a former prisoner of war in Vietnam who led the fight for the interrogation restrictions.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Yeah, and almost everyone here is against that??
It looks like this amendment is a move to clarify the matter. It appears to be somewhat arbitrary now.
Every member of the senate, save for the nine voting "nay" on this amendment, are in dire need of history lessons. While at first glance, the notion of prohibiting "cruel, inhumane, unusual or degrading treatment" of detainees has a clear moral justification, I hope you are not so naive as to think this limitation will not be sorely abused by the enemies of the United States. Have you given no thought at all as to how the word "degrading" will be interpreted?
Is there any treatment AT ALL that won't be labeled "inhuman" and "cruel", including DETENTION ITSELF!? Just consider, for a moment, how far flung the concept of "rights" has become in our own country, with regard to imprisonment. This legislation effectively grants the full protection of the US Constitution to the ENEMIES OF OUR COUNTRY!!
You and your fellow senators have gift wrapped a major victory for terrorists around the world. You have given a further air of legitimacy to hysterical accusations of "torture" in the Abu Ghraib scandal, which consisted of treatment milder than most fraternity initiations. It is clear that you are not fit to lead during this dangerous time of global terrorism.
You have participated in an attempted coup on the executive branch. That you have done so in a time of war is frankly astonishing. This was a despicable move, and I will strenuously oppose both yours and Senator Thomas' reelections because of this vote alone.
BTT
McCain again
They'll accept full responsibility for commissioning a panel to determine what Bush did wrong. Does that count?
well, if the theory that he nominated harriett miers because she will support his "obsession" with the war is true, then I absolutely would expect a veto on this.
I understand Mccain's concerns, but I think he is living in a different era. He once was a hero to me, he has squandered most of that away, unfortunately.
Bed-wetting, limp-weenies!
I agree with your first point. Anyone know yet what the restrictions are?
Yeah, and almost everyone here is against that??I’m not sure if you’re serious. Do you want squads of ACLU lawyers investigating and litigating each terrorist claim that they were "cruelly” treated when they were blindfolded and shacked while moved, that 20 hours without sleep was “inhuman”, or that being yelled at by interrogators was “degrading”? (Incase you didn’t know, when the ACLU wins a case against the government, their lawyers are paid top dollar for all billed hours.)
God told Bush it's ok to spend like a democrat and to ignore the Veto Pen.
I am starting to think that Bush is back on the sauce.
90% of the Senate now influenced by the ACLU!?
That is the problem that this would fix. Right now there are no standards, or if there are they are confusing. Our tropps don't know what they can and can't do. This would spell out those things - so that the troops know when they are crossing the line.
None of those things you listed - sleep deprivation, blindfolded and shackled, yelled at by interrogators - could be considered torture. Murder, Rape, and physical beatings would.
Lieberman and the other 89 Senators are right on this.
BTTT.
The spineless 91 (I figure the abstention of lib Corizine would've voted for it too if he had showed up.).
Thank You.
I hope everyone on this board does this. With a Senate like this we don't need .......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.