I am NOT a conspiracy kind of person. But I went to Yahoo- nothing on headlines there..then popped into US News..scrolled down..nothing. Just wondering why a bomb going off at a college football game isn't worth at least a blurb.
Explosion kills one — apparently a suicide — outside U. of Okla. football game
"Just wondering why a bomb going off at a college football game isn't worth at least a blurb."
Welcome to reality. They don't want to scare the masses, hurt the stock markets, etc. "Apparently a suicide." I'm curious about this guy's name, religion, and nationality.
http://www.kfor.com/Global/story.asp?S=3925606
The story from here makes it sound like there was indeed several devices. The bomber, a second ED, and something found in the stadium...
Either it is poor reporting or there is more to the story and the feds want to be sure to get the story right, AND suicide bombers don't work alone there is a cell of 5-10 people involved. They don't want leaks to tip them off. That could very well be why there is limited media coverage of the event(s). A less is more approach to catch the cell(s). Loose lips...sink ships.
"Just wondering why a bomb going off at a college football game isn't worth at least a blurb."
On the morning of the first London bombings, I happened to be watching CNBC-Europe -- and they reported it as "multiple explosions caused by power surges - terrorism not involved" for at least 3 hours before someone finally let the cat out of the bag.
Governments and/or media (I won't get into conspiracy thinking -- I WON'T!!) sure seem to have a policy of trying real hard to bury initial reports like this.
(I look for a future headline something like: "Nuclear detonation in Midtown Manhattan -- terrorism not suspected.")