Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anatomy of a Photograph (more media bias and omission)
Zombie Time ^ | 9/27/05

Posted on 09/27/2005 4:05:54 PM PDT by Brian Mosely

Anatomy of a Photograph



An analysis of a single seemingly innocuous photograph, and the pervasive media bias it reveals.


My photo essay of the anti-war protest in San Francisco on September 24, 2005 was not the only report done about the event. A few other outlets ran their own coverage. But the one photo from the rally that was seen by the most people was this:


Why? Because the San Francisco Chronicle, which had the only mainstream media coverage of the rally, published this photograph on its front page as a teaser for their article about the event.



Now, let's take a closer look at this image.


By chance, I took a photo of the same girl just a few moments later. Looks practically identical, doesn't it?

But you might notice that my picture is lower resolution. That's because it's a zoomed-in portion of a much larger photograph. I cropped off the other parts of the picture to get a close-up of the girl.

But what would happen if I hadn't cropped off so much? Let's take a step backward and reveal what the San Francisco Chronicle didn't want you to see.




Here's the same photo without as much cropping, revealing more of the context. You can see that the girl's protest contingent also sported Palestinian flags and obscene placards.

Now let's take another step back.



Here's my full original photo, uncropped. Now we can see that the girl is just one of several teenagers, all wearing terrorist-style bandannas covering their faces.

But, as you'll notice, the bandannas are all printed with the same design. Was this a grassroots protest statement the teenagers had come up with all by themselves?


To find out, let's take a look at another photo in the series, taken at the same time:



Oops -- it looks like they're actually being stage-managed by an adult, who is giving them directions and guiding them toward the front of the march. But who is she?

The last picture in the series reveals all.



It turns out that the woman giving directions belongs to one of the Communist groups organizing the rally -- if her t-shirt is to be believed, since it depicts

the flag of Communist Vietnam, which has been frequently displayed by such groups at protest rallies in the U.S. for decades.


The San Francisco Chronicle featured the original photograph on its front page in order to convey a positive message about the rally -- perhaps that even politically aware teenagers were inspired to show up and rally for peace, sporting the message, "People of Color say 'No to War!'" And that served the Chronicle's agenda.

But this simple analysis reveals the very subtle but insidious type of bias that occurs in the media all the time. The Chronicle did not print an inaccuracy, nor did it doctor a photograph to misrepresent the facts. Instead, the Chronicle committed the sin of omission: it told you the truth, but it didn't tell you the whole truth.



Because the whole truth -- that the girl was part of a group of naive teenagers recruited by Communist activists to wear terrorist-style bandannas and carry Palestinian flags and obscene placards -- is disturbing, and doesn't conform to the narrative that the Chronicle is trying to promote. By presenting the photo out of context, and only showing the one image that suits its purpose, the Chronicle is intentionally manipulating the reader's impression of the rally, and the rally's intent.

Such tactics -- in the no-man's-land between ethical and unethical -- are commonplace in the media, and have been for decades. It is only now, with the advent of citizen journalism, that we can at last begin to see the whole story and realize that the public has been manipulated like this all along.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communist; deceit; enemywithin; lefties; mdm; mediabias; msm; supportthetroops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-182 next last
To: Brian Mosely
The Chronicle did not print an inaccuracy, nor did it doctor a photograph to misrepresent the facts. Instead, the Chronicle committed the sin of omission: it told you the truth, but it didn't tell you the whole truth.

IMHO you did one hell of a great job with this... Brian, if you have a ping list, please add me. Also, what about a "Bias" thread every day. We can all add our oun examples...

81 posted on 09/27/2005 8:01:08 PM PDT by GOPJ (When incentives are switched, patterns change. Until then, it's same old, same old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely; holdonnow; Kenny Bunk; JLO; Alamo-Girl

wow, I am impressed with the excellent presentation of the facts..


82 posted on 09/27/2005 8:15:40 PM PDT by bitt ('It is a good thing the Commander in Chief is tough as nails.' (FR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Good job, Brian. The press is great for taking quotes out of context to support their agenda. THey also do this with images through judicious use of cropping. Who knows what other darkroom tricks are used to convey the desired message...


83 posted on 09/27/2005 8:16:13 PM PDT by meyer (The DNC prefers advancing the party at the expense of human lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Photo Bump!


84 posted on 09/27/2005 8:21:44 PM PDT by f zero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim; Rummyfan; Izzy Dunne; pollyannaish; Reactionary; JeanS; uncitizen; Paleo Conservative; ...

ping - a must read


85 posted on 09/27/2005 8:23:49 PM PDT by GOPJ (When incentives are switched, patterns change. Until then, it's same old, same old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Was this cropped photo comparison of yours the same one Rush Limbaugh mentioned today as part of a larger discussion about the media and the protest coverage?

Impressive analysis of our propaganda-mongering media. If they were the least bit honest, they'd use that Communist star as their logo.


86 posted on 09/27/2005 8:24:27 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

MSM is dying but not willingly or quick enough.


87 posted on 09/27/2005 8:31:10 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: All

Just want to point out again; I AM NOT the author of this piece, please give credit to Zombie! Thanks.


88 posted on 09/27/2005 8:33:09 PM PDT by Brian Mosely (A government is a body of people -- usually notably ungoverned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Thanks brian, and especially to Zombie.

The presentation was top notch. Even I, a died in the wool skeptic of MSM, was startled when I scrolled down and saw the yellow star.

Just imagine the world w/o the internet. Scary.


89 posted on 09/27/2005 8:43:13 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Thanks for the ping.

Did you see this?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1492524/posts?page=17

Gary Handschumacher was waiting for police to arrest him yesterday afternoon as he joined Cindy Sheehan...

says it was an honor to be arrested ...


90 posted on 09/27/2005 8:46:50 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Pard
I submit it's not taken at the same time at least. Notice the prominant knot in the first photo. The knot is directly centered over the white stripe. In subsequent photos the knot is changed and drawn over the the left side of (subjects left side).

I don't think the shift of the knot means much. It could have happened at any time. Ever wear a scarf tied on your head? I have. They slip a lot. You tighten it and it slips again.

91 posted on 09/27/2005 8:49:45 PM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thanks for the ping!


92 posted on 09/27/2005 9:24:12 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher

I've wondered about those same things myself, we have a anti-American insurgency in this country and I suspect these groups will have some sort of tie-ins to communist/Islamist/dictatorships across the world.


93 posted on 09/27/2005 9:32:49 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
My favorite photo from that series:

Can anyone tell me exactly what these young women are trying to communicate?

94 posted on 09/27/2005 9:37:47 PM PDT by SinisterDexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Outstanding thread... thank you. I'll ping my biggest list here in a couple of minutes.


95 posted on 09/27/2005 9:58:19 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
Excellent photo essay and presentation of facts here. Don't miss this one...

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

96 posted on 09/27/2005 10:00:49 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse; doug from upland; Mia T; ALOHA RONNIE; jwalsh07; Born Conservative; mhking; ...

Excellent photo essay and presentation of facts here. Don't miss this one...


97 posted on 09/27/2005 10:02:10 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Thanks so much for the ping. Outstanding photo essay and presentation of facts.


98 posted on 09/27/2005 10:03:21 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Just imagine the world w/o the internet. Scary.

Dittos to that...

99 posted on 09/27/2005 10:05:53 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; tgslTakoma; Angelwood; firebrand; Doctor Raoul; abner; victim of circumstance; StarFan; ..

See photo in #35. Nice signage work... BWAHAHAHA! ;-D


100 posted on 09/27/2005 10:09:33 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson