Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: Crackingham
Hmmm, what would a guy like Billy Clinton do with this kind of power?
2 posted on
09/27/2005 8:21:47 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: Crackingham
Damned if he do, damned if he don't. What a lousy Catch 22 the Pres is stuck in.
3 posted on
09/27/2005 8:23:33 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Don't get stuck on stupid now, reporters)
To: Crackingham
This is a typical example of the dysfunctional behavior of trying to be responsible for someone else's irresponsibility. Some of us have tried that approach within the family system and it breeds nothing but dependency, resentment, pain, and more suffering.
Create a great Free Republic Day!
To: Crackingham
All this because of some highly incompetent idiots in Louisiana, i.e., DemokRATS
5 posted on
09/27/2005 8:23:43 AM PDT by
lormand
(George W. Bush is saving your ass, whether you like it or not.)
To: Crackingham
Huge mistake.
Anytime the Federal Gov't gets more power, its bad.
6 posted on
09/27/2005 8:24:47 AM PDT by
mad puppy
( The Southern border needs to be a MAJOR issue in 2006 and 2008)
To: Crackingham
This is a very bad idea.
I can understand Bush's wish to be able to help and not have his hands tied by incompetent governors.
However, the States are supposed to be free from Federal interference in such issues unless they ask for help. THe states have the authority and the responsibility, and it should remain that way.
To: Crackingham
It's a Catch-22 for sure.
The federal government are not first responders. However, what happens if state and local officials (as well as FEMA) bungle the case, as they did with Katrina?
To: Crackingham
Florida, Texas, Mississippi and Alabama responded very well to the hurricanes. So why should the whole system be changed because one state with a couple of morons for governor and mayor of N'awlins screwed up!
Solution: replace "Dumb & Dumber" and leave well enough alone!
13 posted on
09/27/2005 8:32:03 AM PDT by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: Crackingham
GWB needs to appropriate some federal taxpayer funds and build a new multi-million dollar edifice to house the soon-to-be-burgeoning Dept. of Hurricanes and Other Natural Calamities
14 posted on
09/27/2005 8:32:15 AM PDT by
jla
To: Crackingham; All
Fellow Freepers. I think we are seeing more srtategery in action. This is a direct counter-punch to the media attack on the President's response to Katrina. This move highlights the way the current laws work and will put the liberals in a catch-22. They would love to have more power, but supporting this move lets him off the hook. Opposing this plan shows they really DIDN'T want to fix the problem, just attack Bush. This move parries both lines of attack.
To: Crackingham
We don't need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Blanco is the bathwater.
To: Crackingham
The party of smaller government strikes again.
To: Crackingham
President Bush yesterday sought to federalize hurricane-relief efforts, removing governors from the decision-making process. ...Or, we could just elect competent governors.
18 posted on
09/27/2005 8:37:37 AM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Crackingham
What an original idea.....expanding the federal govt's powers.....
19 posted on
09/27/2005 8:38:07 AM PDT by
NRA1995
(When liberals speak I hear the Vonage music playing.....woo-hoo, woo-hoo-hoo....)
To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; beckysueb; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
21 posted on
09/27/2005 8:39:11 AM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: Crackingham
While I don't think this is a good idea I can't blame President Bush for proposing it. Essentially he is saying that OK I took a big hit for Katrina so I am going to make sure that next time I don't have to deal with the likes of Nagin and Blanco. If the dems stand in his way he can say, after the next disaster, I tried to get authority to step in but you blocked it. This is a political move and at least it's a 'fighting back' attempt by President Bush.
22 posted on
09/27/2005 8:39:16 AM PDT by
sydbas
I dunno if this is good or bad, but they should name it the Blanco-Nagin Act.
24 posted on
09/27/2005 8:42:58 AM PDT by
D-fendr
To: Crackingham
Bush has been expanding federal government and presidential power ever since he was elected. Is anybody really surprised he's grabbing at the chance to do so again?
26 posted on
09/27/2005 8:45:34 AM PDT by
Gone GF
To: Crackingham; billbears
"It wouldn't be necessary to get a request from the governor or take other action," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said yesterday.
"This would be," he added, "more of an automatic trigger." So much for enumerated powers of the FedGov and the Constitution. Might as well throw conservatism out the same window.
27 posted on
09/27/2005 8:46:14 AM PDT by
azhenfud
(He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
To: Crackingham
Emergencies? Riots? Floods? Volcanos? Terrorists? Wrong election outcome? Endangered species?
29 posted on
09/27/2005 8:46:54 AM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson