Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/27/2005 8:19:26 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: Crackingham

Hmmm, what would a guy like Billy Clinton do with this kind of power?


2 posted on 09/27/2005 8:21:47 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Damned if he do, damned if he don't. What a lousy Catch 22 the Pres is stuck in.


3 posted on 09/27/2005 8:23:33 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Don't get stuck on stupid now, reporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
This is a typical example of the dysfunctional behavior of trying to be responsible for someone else's irresponsibility. Some of us have tried that approach within the family system and it breeds nothing but dependency, resentment, pain, and more suffering.

Create a great Free Republic Day!

4 posted on 09/27/2005 8:23:42 AM PDT by moasicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
All this because of some highly incompetent idiots in Louisiana, i.e., DemokRATS
5 posted on 09/27/2005 8:23:43 AM PDT by lormand (George W. Bush is saving your ass, whether you like it or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Huge mistake.

Anytime the Federal Gov't gets more power, its bad.


6 posted on 09/27/2005 8:24:47 AM PDT by mad puppy ( The Southern border needs to be a MAJOR issue in 2006 and 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

This is a very bad idea.

I can understand Bush's wish to be able to help and not have his hands tied by incompetent governors.

However, the States are supposed to be free from Federal interference in such issues unless they ask for help. THe states have the authority and the responsibility, and it should remain that way.


7 posted on 09/27/2005 8:26:03 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

It's a Catch-22 for sure.

The federal government are not first responders. However, what happens if state and local officials (as well as FEMA) bungle the case, as they did with Katrina?


8 posted on 09/27/2005 8:27:53 AM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Florida, Texas, Mississippi and Alabama responded very well to the hurricanes. So why should the whole system be changed because one state with a couple of morons for governor and mayor of N'awlins screwed up!
Solution: replace "Dumb & Dumber" and leave well enough alone!


13 posted on 09/27/2005 8:32:03 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
GWB needs to appropriate some federal taxpayer funds and build a new multi-million dollar edifice to house the soon-to-be-burgeoning Dept. of Hurricanes and Other Natural Calamities
14 posted on 09/27/2005 8:32:15 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham; All

Fellow Freepers. I think we are seeing more srtategery in action. This is a direct counter-punch to the media attack on the President's response to Katrina. This move highlights the way the current laws work and will put the liberals in a catch-22. They would love to have more power, but supporting this move lets him off the hook. Opposing this plan shows they really DIDN'T want to fix the problem, just attack Bush. This move parries both lines of attack.


15 posted on 09/27/2005 8:34:42 AM PDT by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

We don't need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Blanco is the bathwater.


16 posted on 09/27/2005 8:35:40 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

The party of smaller government strikes again.


17 posted on 09/27/2005 8:36:42 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
President Bush yesterday sought to federalize hurricane-relief efforts, removing governors from the decision-making process.

...Or, we could just elect competent governors.

18 posted on 09/27/2005 8:37:37 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
What an original idea.....expanding the federal govt's powers.....
19 posted on 09/27/2005 8:38:07 AM PDT by NRA1995 (When liberals speak I hear the Vonage music playing.....woo-hoo, woo-hoo-hoo....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; beckysueb; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
21 posted on 09/27/2005 8:39:11 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

While I don't think this is a good idea I can't blame President Bush for proposing it. Essentially he is saying that OK I took a big hit for Katrina so I am going to make sure that next time I don't have to deal with the likes of Nagin and Blanco. If the dems stand in his way he can say, after the next disaster, I tried to get authority to step in but you blocked it. This is a political move and at least it's a 'fighting back' attempt by President Bush.


22 posted on 09/27/2005 8:39:16 AM PDT by sydbas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I dunno if this is good or bad, but they should name it the Blanco-Nagin Act.


24 posted on 09/27/2005 8:42:58 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Bush has been expanding federal government and presidential power ever since he was elected. Is anybody really surprised he's grabbing at the chance to do so again?


26 posted on 09/27/2005 8:45:34 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham; billbears
"It wouldn't be necessary to get a request from the governor or take other action," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said yesterday.

"This would be," he added, "more of an automatic trigger."

So much for enumerated powers of the FedGov and the Constitution. Might as well throw conservatism out the same window.

27 posted on 09/27/2005 8:46:14 AM PDT by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Emergencies? Riots? Floods? Volcanos? Terrorists? Wrong election outcome? Endangered species?


29 posted on 09/27/2005 8:46:54 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson