Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question for FReepers: How do we stop Islamic terror in America?
The United American Committee ^ | United American Committee

Posted on 09/18/2005 3:59:05 PM PDT by JesseP

Just a little question posed to the forum: What are your suggestions for activities the United American Committee may do to help stop Islamic terror in America and protect the American people? FYI The UAC focuses on confronting the Islamic extremist threat in the U.S., we'd like to know the peoples thoughts on activities and direction:


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: banislamforever; bigotbait; closethemosques; counterterrorism; extremism; islam; islamic; islamists; islamofascism; terrorism; terrorist; uac; waronterror; wtc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-204 next last
To: JesseP

Without reading all the replies my suggestion is hunting them all down, pitching them OUT of the US and NOT letting anymore of them in!


81 posted on 09/18/2005 5:44:19 PM PDT by swmobuffalo (the only good terrorist is a dead one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
"but we were in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait"

At their request.

And we should leave; what, are we their hostages? Again, let them diaper themselves.

"And the Balkans."

Clinton.

What's yer point? We can overlook interventionism if Clinton did it? Doesn't matter who (and I believe he had the support of Congress); again, let them take care of themselves.

"And Europe."

NATO agreement.

See above answers.

"And Japan."

Japan is an Ally, and is afraid of North Korea.

"And Korea."

By agreement and request since the 50's.

See above answers.

"And Southeast Asia."

??

We're no longer in Vietnam.

SE Asia's a big place. We have 1200 soldiers in the Phillipines. Same answer as above.

82 posted on 09/18/2005 5:50:27 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (Sola Gratia, Sola Fide, Sola Scriptura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
The PROBLEM IS, that too few of our fellow citizens realize that THIS is the solution to the "Islamic Problem!"

Doc

83 posted on 09/18/2005 5:52:19 PM PDT by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DeeOhGee

"And we should leave; what, are we their hostages? Again, let them diaper themselves."

You are obviously also missing some news: We're closing some of our bases in Germany much to their chagrin.

"What's yer point?"

My point is that CLinton did stuff regardless of what the 'right' thing was, and the Balkans were an issue he shouldn't have gotten involved in but thought he could manipuilate to his advantage.

It is largely outside of your initial premise.


"See above answers."

So you're an isiolationsit.
Sorry, that won't cut it.
It didn't work in the 1930's and 40's.
It won't work now.


84 posted on 09/18/2005 5:53:47 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: DeeOhGee

"We have 1200 soldiers in the Phillipines."

Whoop-de-do.

The major base of Op there has been closed since CLINTON.


85 posted on 09/18/2005 5:54:30 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
LOL..I guess I do have some isolationist tendencies, but I would argue that this conversation is hardly proof of that. I would also argue that it was not tried in the '30s and '40s.

But that's okay. If I agreed with absolutely everything on this site, it would be pretty boring, wouldn't it?

And I agree completely with you on Clinton's adventures in the Balkans - we never should have gotten into it. But I wholly and completely supported the troops. I had a good friend who went over as part of Virginia's 29th ID - he was the Regimental Engineer. Was happy he made it home safely.

86 posted on 09/18/2005 5:58:10 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (Sola Gratia, Sola Fide, Sola Scriptura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: JesseP

"turn the U.S. Military Intelligence/Counterintelligence community loose on" Interesting thought....

Yeah the Pentagon has a bigger budget for this kind of stuff thal local LEA.

to expand ... turn the data over to the sheriff and PDs intel units (make this legal to do) and then kick @ss and take names.


87 posted on 09/18/2005 5:58:11 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JesseP

Blow the moon rock God box back to hell. It will show the long bearded smelly ones that their "God" has no power.

If that doesn't work...go with the bullets and bombs solution until all their bases are belong to us.


JEDI.


88 posted on 09/18/2005 5:59:38 PM PDT by JediForce (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseP

89 posted on 09/18/2005 5:59:55 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeeOhGee

"I guess I do have some isolationist tendencies, but I would argue that this conversation is hardly proof of that."

Post 46: "1. Stop intervening in foreign countries' affairs. Bring all the troops back and put them on the southern border."

Barbary Pirates, Quasi War, those could be termed interfering in the 'affairs' of other nations.

Point is, pulling our troops out of everywhere is not strategically sound, nor wise.
We do have interests overseas, and not having troops within a few hours transport distance of possible trouble spots is a bad idea.

"but we were in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait." -post 77 in response to me saying that 9/11 didn't happen due to us being in Afghanistan or Iraq.
In essence, your response is saying that it happened due to us being in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

IF we didn't have troops in Saudi Arabia, we would not have been able to topple Saddam.


90 posted on 09/18/2005 6:03:07 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: JesseP

I completely agree. The first place to start is to stop pushing multiculturalism in the schools. We have gone from a melting pot to a smorgasbord. Victor Davis Hanson's book Mexifornia applies to the Muslim immigrants (or any immigrants) the same way it does to Hispanics.

Review of book: America, the great melting pot, has welcomed millions of immigrants in its 227 years. But gone are the days when immigrants eagerly assimilated, urged by teachers and government officials. Hanson notes thatin the good ol' days an Italian or Jew knew that if he did not take up English and the American system, he would be left behind while his peers moved ahead. When Hanson was in school his teachers instilled in all students a sense of personal possibility, taught them a love of country, and gave them the tools to learn. For immigrant children, failure to assimilate meant a career in fruit picking and a place in the underclass.

Today, however, that is not the case. A separatist culture exists and is encouraged by intellectual elites, the multiculturalists, and politicians from both parties. Multiculturalists have hijacked classrooms in order to teach self-esteem building, among other things.

America's most inspiring figures, like Thomas Jefferson or Robert E. Lee, however, are vilified or completely overlooked. One cannot instill confidence, Hanson rightly notes, by glorifying other cultures at the expense of deleting references to the dynamism and morality of American civilization. The people seeking haven here need to know why our country is great in order to appreciate what we have.


91 posted on 09/18/2005 6:03:58 PM PDT by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Besides, I do not have - and have not heard - a more practical or pracicable solution. We cannot, realistically or practically, wipe out every Muslim on earth, or every terrorist on earth.


92 posted on 09/18/2005 6:04:06 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (Sola Gratia, Sola Fide, Sola Scriptura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: JesseP

Boycott the MSM and tell them shut up and let the military win this war and get it over with.


93 posted on 09/18/2005 6:04:39 PM PDT by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeeOhGee

"Besides, I do not have - and have not heard - a more practical or pracicable solution."

Curling up and playing dead is a solution?
Sorry, liberals do that.


94 posted on 09/18/2005 6:04:58 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: brivette

I was going to say the same thing but there are terrorist cells all over this country sitting quietly and waiting for the right moment. The key is we can't give them the right moment.


95 posted on 09/18/2005 6:05:51 PM PDT by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DeeOhGee
Wrong on your points, ma'am.

...and wrong on theology, too (tagline error alert!).

...But that's for another topic and another thread.

96 posted on 09/18/2005 6:06:50 PM PDT by AlaninSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
Yep, that is where the extremism takes place and the arming of the Terrorist are indoctrinated.
97 posted on 09/18/2005 6:07:04 PM PDT by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DeeOhGee

I already offered a solution in post 39.


98 posted on 09/18/2005 6:07:19 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Nah, the Barbary Pirates were a Naval action. At that time there were separate Naval Departments - for, among other things, protecting America's shipping interests and War Departments for, well, waging war. A Declaration of War was a commitment of the resources of the War Department. A President could order limited Naval actions without a declaration of war.

And it was OBL who said he was waging war against the US because of the troops in Saudi Arabia.

99 posted on 09/18/2005 6:08:20 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (Sola Gratia, Sola Fide, Sola Scriptura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Well, aside from my first step, then, we are in complete agreement.


100 posted on 09/18/2005 6:09:32 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (Sola Gratia, Sola Fide, Sola Scriptura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson