To: SmithL
"We cannot have a system where the people vote and the Legislature derails that vote," Bingo!
2 posted on
09/07/2005 6:08:11 PM PDT by
SmithL
(There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
To: SmithL
8 posted on
09/07/2005 6:10:11 PM PDT by
samiam1972
(Live simply so that others may simply live!)
To: SmithL
No surprise to me.
I knew he'd veto it, soon as I
heard about this "vote."
12 posted on
09/07/2005 6:10:21 PM PDT by
the Deejay
(THE LADY DEEJAY)
To: SmithL; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; tubebender; Brad's Gramma; BurbankKarl; ...
To: SmithL
We cannot have a system where the people vote and the Legislature derails that vote
Well I guess someone is paying attention in Sacramento after all.
33 posted on
09/07/2005 6:13:03 PM PDT by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: SmithL
Yeah, I respect him for this. But the joke is, domestic partners are pretty much the same thing. So woohoo, people, you've protected a word.
To: SmithL
Love that Arnie! He knows we the voters do not want this!
63 posted on
09/07/2005 6:20:46 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Leftist=Anti American!)
To: SmithL
The Republican governor had indicated in previous statements that he would veto the bill, saying the debate over same-sex marriage should be decided by voters or the courts.The courts?????
97 posted on
09/07/2005 6:30:20 PM PDT by
va4me
("Government isn't the solution to the problem, it is the problem" - Ronald Reagan)
To: SmithL
Yahoo........calling the Governor's office tomorrow. That is GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
138 posted on
09/07/2005 6:58:10 PM PDT by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: SmithL
"We cannot have a system where the people vote and the Legislature derails that vote," The Demon Rats do that to us all the time here in Washington State.
142 posted on
09/07/2005 7:02:28 PM PDT by
Spunky
("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
To: SmithL
Homosexuals are not DISCRIMINATED against, because being HETEROSEXUAL is not a prerequisite to get married. Not one State in the Union requires you to prove your heterosexual to get married. Gays can get married like anyone else, and like everyone else they must marry someone of the opposite sex.
145 posted on
09/07/2005 7:04:59 PM PDT by
Exton1
To: SmithL
"We cannot have a system where the people vote and the Legislature derails that vote,"
Happens all the time out here in Cali.
Thank you Governor Schwarzenegger!
To: SmithL
I wish people here wouldn't bash Arnold so much. RINO or not he is the best we can get in California.
198 posted on
09/07/2005 8:52:29 PM PDT by
zendari
To: SmithL
199 posted on
09/07/2005 8:58:39 PM PDT by
zendari
To: SmithL
He better damn well veto it.
203 posted on
09/07/2005 9:04:05 PM PDT by
mzbzybee
(Proud To Be a Army Mom)
To: SmithL
"We cannot have a system where the people vote and the Legislature derails that vote,"
Bingo!
Now it is about time.
234 posted on
09/07/2005 10:36:26 PM PDT by
television is just wrong
(http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
To: SmithL; little jeremiah; tubebender; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Bravo!
"We cannot have a system where the people vote and the Legislature derails that vote," the governor's press secretary, Margita Thompson, said in a statement. "Out of respect for the will of the people, the governor will veto (the bill)."
Does anyone have any doubt that the maggot Davis would have signed this bill as soon as it hit his desk?
245 posted on
09/07/2005 11:04:53 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Jamie Gorelick is responsible for more dead Americans(9-11) than those killed in Iraq.)
To: SmithL
PROP 22 BABY!!!
California Proposition 22
On March 7, 2000, the people of California voted on Proposition 22, a proposal to enact a state "Defense of Marriage Act" as an initiative statute. The text of Prop 22 reads:
Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.
Proposition 22 was ratified by an overwhelming majority of California voters, prevailing by a 23-point margin. Statewide, 4,618,673 votes were cast in favor of the proposition, comprising 61.4% of the total vote. Opponents garnered 2,909,370 votes, for 38.6% of the vote.
Final vote counts revealed that Proposition 22 won in 52 of California's 58 counties, including all of the major metropolitan areas except for San Francisco. The six counties which did not approve Prop. 22 were all in the immediate San Francisco Bay area, including: Alameda county, Marin county, San Francisco county, Santa Cruz county, Sonoma county, and Yolo county.
Full election returns are available on the California Secretary of State website (PDF - 73KB). http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_primary/measures.pdf
264 posted on
09/08/2005 5:05:39 AM PDT by
Dashing Dasher
(Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed. -- George Burns)
To: SmithL
AMEN! The legislature should have been at work on the budget, the border and education rather than an initiative to overturn the will of the people, a la Prop 187. Which I am still pissed about!
293 posted on
09/08/2005 10:14:38 AM PDT by
jw777
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson