Impeach Bush! (Joseph Farah On Upholding American Sovereignty Alert)

Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 08/31/05 | Joseph Farah

[goldstategop]

We won't have a country left if the President willfully pursues policies that threaten American sovereignty. To turn up the heat, there is only one option. A bill of impeachment. If we want to have illegal aliens and terrorists flood this country, by all means, lets close our eyes and continue on our present course. If America is a sovereign state, we will compel the President to take action to defend it - or see himself be forced to vacate his high office.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[zarf]

Farah is a loon.

[Rytwyng]

ping

[roses of sharon]

Hilarious!

[rdb3]

Calling for the impeachment of a wartime president. Unbelievable.

[DTogo]

Yeah, just what we need to pursue in front of our enemies outside and the Enemy Within - NOT!

[c-b 1]

Farah is a loon.

That may be, but could you please explain how he is wrong on this one.

[roses of sharon]

Hilarious!

[tinamina]

My husband says the same thing, "Impeach Bush" because of the border. It is incomprehensible to us that he won't do anything about that border. We both voted for Bush and had such high hopes but feel he has willfully failed us on this all important issue.

[pcottraux]

Ouch! My eyes hurt from rolling so hard!

[DoughtyOne]

When Clinton was up for impeachment, I couldn't fathom how leftists could ignore his treachery. I will admit to more than a little frustration with our leaders in Congress for not charging him with obstruction of justice, witness tampering and a number of other infractions. I supported impeachment.

Now it's our guy on the line. I have not been a big supporter of Bush. I did not vote for him in 2000. I did vote for him in 2004.

I have railed on Bush countless times for not fulfilling his obligation to protect the states from invasion. That being said, our Congress is supposed to protect us also. IMO, they're all a bunch of sell-outs to the highest bidder.

If I expect the left to admit there guy has done wrong and eject him, then I must do the same thing when it comes to our guy.

I'm not a big fan of Farrah. I'm not very enthused with Buchanan post 2000 either. That being said, I do think Bush has violated his oath. That does expose him to this type of challenge.

With his efforts in Iraq, I truly do not want to jeopardize what has taken place there. George, many people have jumped on you over the last five years. Why didn't you listen?

This is a pi-- poor mess. One person got us here. He would not listen and now this.

I don't think this is going anywhere, but it's a sad sad tale that this could even be suggested on the merits.

[SubMareener]

Pat Buchanan is a secret admirer of Dick Cheney! Who, of course, would become President if GWB were to be impeached and convicted.

[goldstategop]

The American people might decide its too extreme a step. On the other hand, I don't like the fact this country is vulnerable to another terrorist attack. While I personally like our President, I don't see him taking steps to secure our borders. If he doesn't, my loyalty is to our country first. No country that doesn't maintain its borders will survive for long. Its simply not a tenable position. We have to decide if we want to remain a sovereign country.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[Map Kernow]

My husband says the same thing, "Impeach Bush" because of the border. It is incomprehensible to us that he won't do anything about that border. We both voted for Bush and had such high hopes but feel he has willfully failed us on this all important issue.

You're not alone. Let the misguided partisans of a man and his career laugh the idea to scorn for now. People laughed also when the subject of Clinton's impeachment was first broached.

[Captainpaintball]

Why would anyone in their right mind take the chance of being THE guy that allowed a catastrophic terrorist attack to occur? No matter if it happens in 2009...If a terrorist entered this country from September 12, 2001 to January 20, 2009, Bush will be blamed for it--right or wrong.

I challenge anyone in cyberspace to give me an answer to my original question.

This leads me to subscribe to two theories: A.)This is an orchestrated plan, (insert oneworld theory here) and the Powers That Be will not let a terrorist attack take place because it would screw up those plans, or B.) a terrorist attack IS part of the plan; and Bush's failure won't bother him because it really wouldn't be public. Why? There will be no free media allowed to question the government because liberty would end with a stroke of a pen and an executive order---Martial Law...for the chillllllldren, of course.

[MJY1288]

Pat Buchanan is a nut case, the best thing that ever happened to the right wing is when that idiot left the Republican Party. Pat is nothing but a Cindy Sheehan in drag, and this announcement is proof of his lunacy

[goldstategop]

I know the moonbat Left is also pushing this. They could care less about the country. I love our country. All I want is for our President to start enforcing our laws. No reason he can't fulfill the oath of office he took. The American people don't care who gets the credit for dealing with illegal immigration. However, they certainly want something done about it.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[WestVirginiaRebel]

I kind of imagine the President has other things on his mind right now besides Patty and Farah's rantings.

[Sprite518]

Yeah what are they going to do impeach Bush and every President after that does not enforce the immigration law? If so, then we will be impeaching every president. This is stupid. Pat has lost it.... Most people view him as a lose screw.