Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The OH that twice voted for Bill Clinton could in 2008 deliver the presidency back to Bill through his Hillary.
1 posted on 08/12/2005 9:44:20 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.

well, it would be nice if the OH GOP cleaned up its act .. this looks like an IL redux.


2 posted on 08/12/2005 9:45:45 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

The OHIO 2 race should be a warning to everyone.If we keep standing for "pale pastels" with no bold agenda we will lose in 06.Conservatism is the ONLY redeeming quality of this party.We need to remember this.


3 posted on 08/12/2005 9:47:06 AM PDT by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

Holding a clean election in the metropolitan areas would end this speculation.


4 posted on 08/12/2005 9:51:07 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.; Gipper08

If Kerry had ignored the lobbyists and run hard against free trade, outsourcing, Enron, etc he could have carried Ohio.

Hillary will not repeat that mistake.


5 posted on 08/12/2005 9:52:21 AM PDT by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
"In the wake of a Democratic candidate’s narrow loss in the August 2 special election"

Interesting the Republican candidate won 52% to 48%. My experience in special elections tells me that this a large margin to win by, yet the press keeps referring to it as a close election. I guess they keep dreaming, however, we cannot become complacent.

6 posted on 08/12/2005 9:52:55 AM PDT by Rogle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

"Rare coin investment fund"?????


12 posted on 08/12/2005 10:00:08 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

Hit it Crystal Gayle:

"Don't it make my Buckeyes blue"


13 posted on 08/12/2005 10:00:45 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
In the wake of a Democratic candidate’s narrow loss in the August 2 special election in Ohio’s most Republican U.S. House district, pundits have begun pondering whether the Buckeye State is turning blue.

The democrat lied to the voters. They thought they were voting for a pro-American.
I'll bet they're glad he lost now that the truth had surfaced. That lie will help Republicans next time. Voters don't like being lied to. Ask Bill Clinton!

14 posted on 08/12/2005 10:02:35 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
After Noe received state funds as investments in his coin business in 1998, according to the Blade, he made $7,000 in contributions to then-Secretary of State Taft, who was running for governor. In total, Noe has given $22,190 to Taft. In 1998, he also gave $2,000 to then-Gov. George Voinovich (R.), who was running for the U.S. Senate that year. In addition, he has given $7,500 to Sen. Mike DeWine (R.-Ohio).

I don't see Secretary of State and future Governor Blackwell on there. Good, I hope he didn't get any money from this crook.

19 posted on 08/12/2005 10:07:52 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

Is Ohio turning blue? Possibly. It definitely has become a battleground state, where it was almost a given for the "red" column before. Illinois should have been a salient warning as to what could happen. Not merely a surrender to RINOs, but to RINOs who did not believe in the integrity of the Republican party, RINOs that would jump ship and become Democrats in an eyeblink. All to punish something, I know not what.

Maybe some people would sooner not be reminded of their own conscience.


22 posted on 08/12/2005 10:10:37 AM PDT by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
In the wake of a Democratic candidate’s narrow loss in the August 2 special election in Ohio’s most Republican U.S. House district, pundits have begun pondering whether the Buckeye State is turning blue.

If that's the case then why did the Democrats run ads connecting their candidate so closely to Bush - even using clips of speeches?

24 posted on 08/12/2005 10:11:02 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

"Is Ohio Turning Blue?"

It will, if it holds its breath long enough.


25 posted on 08/12/2005 10:12:11 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Lord, I apologize . . . and be with the starving pygmies in New Guinea amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
"Is Ohio Turning Blue?" No, just the Governor... and he probably always has been.
26 posted on 08/12/2005 10:18:18 AM PDT by FearNoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

I'm not buying it. The dems ran a "Republican Light" candidate, spent a ton of resources and, and. . . . .LOST!!! It is just amazing to me that the dems have to try and characterize a loss as a victory to make themselves feel good. From what I have read 52-48% in a special election is a wide margin given the low turnout associated with such elections. Honestly, this strikes me as pure and simple MSM wishful thinking. I will put forth this proposition, if the margin was 60-40% the MSM STILL would have characterized it as being "closer" than it should have been.

The story to the MSM is that 2006 will be like 1994. The MSM just can't get over the fact that the stories they are reporting just aren't matching reality.

As for Ohio turning from dem to Republican on a local level, perhaps that is what is needed for the Ohio GOP to wake up and kick out the RINO's. But, that doesn't mean Ohio is going Red in National Politics.


27 posted on 08/12/2005 10:18:51 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

No!
Is Ohio Turning Blue?
Human Events Online Gizzi, John
THIS is why they shouldn't make these guys write too often or in the summer of odd years.


37 posted on 08/12/2005 1:40:40 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (The ratmedia: always eager to remind us of why we hate them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

Not if Blackwell becomes Governor.
If they keep putting up these RINO Republicans and expect to get elected, they will find out the hard way they miscalculated.
Maybe yanking their power from them is what they need at this point.


43 posted on 08/14/2005 8:36:12 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Lurk forever, but once you post, your newbness shines like a new pair of shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

yes that is true, but I reject this idiotic notion of a red and blue state as though the way states vote is something permanent.

OH voted DEM in 1976, 1992 and 1996.

Just because they might elect a DEM gov next year doesnt mean squat. CA, IL, PA, WI, MI, OH, NY, NJ, MA all had GOP govs in 1996 and Dole didnt carry a single one of those states.

RED/BLUE is just a way for the media to be lazy and not do any real political reporting


45 posted on 08/14/2005 8:38:57 AM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson