Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baby yanked from couple for kisses on belly button
WorldNetDaily ^ | 07/27/2005 | WorldNetDaily.com

Posted on 07/27/2005 4:11:22 PM PDT by WaveMan

The ordeal is finally over, but for the past year, a North Carolina family has been torn apart after state officials claimed family photos of a father kissing his baby's belly button were some kind of child abuse.

It began when Teresa Hamaty took impromptu party snapshots of her husband, Charbel, playfully embracing their naked, newborn son, Kristoff.

After dropping the film off at an Eckerd store in North Raleigh, authorities were notified.

"You see the back of the baby, and like if someone is kissing the baby's belly button," Teresa told WRAL-TV.

But police saw the worst and arrested Teresa for taking sexually explicit photos, charged her husband with felony sexual assault, and put Kristoff and his half-sister in protective custody.

"It was a nightmare," Charbel said, after spending half a year in jail.

Teresa took months fighting to gain back custody of her children.

"I think this was one of those times that they got the wrong people," Teresa said. "They were too quick to judge when they took one look at my husband."

Dozens of Hamaty supporters showed up for court appearances, claiming police overreacted. They raised some $140,000 in legal and living expenses for the Hamatys.

"[It] makes me feel, that's it – that's why I have to be strong for – to show everybody what the truth is," Charbel told the station.

The charges eventually were dropped when a report submitted by an expert said there was no criminal intent in the pictures.

"I hate cameras," Charbel now says. "I don't like taking pictures."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: abuse; childabuse; cps; dhhs; dshs; dss; gayagenda; innocentplay; nodignity; pedophileintraining; pervertparents; photo; photography; sexualassault; stupidparents; uptightfreepsfoad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: Reagan79
Yep. You are right! He looks fine. Oh well it must be Bush's fault. The Justice Department is getting too tough on sexual predators.

My comment about how he looks was in reply to another comment about "how he looks." The second part of my comment is my opinion after having read the article. How do you think the separation of the family members affected the baby and the other sibling? Not to mention having a father in jail for 6 mos. Apparently the father is innocent.

121 posted on 07/28/2005 6:13:55 AM PDT by sandlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
It isn't the police who have this power to throw people into jail. It is DSS, or CPS, or whatever they call it in your state. It is the greatest abuse of government power we have now

Yep.
And the sad thing is that most people do not realize that under the U.S.Constitution, you have the right to refuse to let an agent of the state into your home without a search warrant. CPS thrives on that ignorance.

They show up and say "We just want to ask you a few questions..." The freaked out parent (who wants to appear "cooperative") lets them in. Once they are over the threshhold, you have voluntarily conceded to a search and siezure - as far as the courts and police are concerned.

122 posted on 07/28/2005 6:48:50 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

No kidding! Us too. We have pics of our youngest (taken by a professional photographer) of her nekkid and a plastic hair barrette right on top of her little... Cute as heck and embarrasses her (when she was younger. This was in 1979. Also have home movies of her nekkid (she hated wearig clothes) at about 2-3 years old riding her hobby horse.


123 posted on 07/28/2005 8:20:56 AM PDT by gopheraj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

When I was a kid we used to raspberry my baby brothers tummy all the time. He loved it.

Come and get me coppers!!!


124 posted on 07/28/2005 8:30:15 AM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ppaul

Yes but if you refuse they go to the judge and say that you are hiding something and get an order to remove your children from your home based only on the fact that you would not let them in your home without a warrant. (I've seen it done) Your damned if you do and damned if you don't.


125 posted on 07/28/2005 8:47:21 AM PDT by sfimom ('Mommy why did they kill her cause she couldn't talk?' (my daughter age8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: festus
This typically happens when a person is not able to post enough money for his bail.

I understand that can happen when one can't post bail, however, six months is not anywhere near "speedy".
126 posted on 07/28/2005 9:03:09 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: sfimom
Yes but if you refuse they go to the judge and say that you are hiding something and get an order to remove your children from your home based only on the fact that you would not let them in your home without a warrant.

I forgot to mention: MAKE SURE YOU IMMEDIATELY HIRE A LAWYER who specializes in CPS type cases. Don't wait for them to come back with a warrant.

Once they know there's an attorney involved, they watch their behinds to make sure they don't screw up. In fact, they will often drop a case when an attorney is involved in the early stages. There are too many indigent folks out there who cannot aford to hire an attorney that CPS can turn their sights on. If you make it difficult for them to violate your rights, it's easier to concentrate on some poor saps who don't know their rights. However, if you don't have an attorney, they can run roughshod over you, disregarding the Constitution, for the children of course.

127 posted on 07/28/2005 12:54:10 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: WillMalven

That's why I said the investigation phase should've been limited to priors and the context of the other photos from that film. The family didn't even have to know, if the police had just done that logical bit of investigation. As it is, the police certainly did go too far.


128 posted on 07/28/2005 8:26:24 PM PDT by skr (Almighty God, thank you for the liberty you have bestowed upon this nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Just curious, which state would that be?


129 posted on 07/29/2005 3:29:15 PM PDT by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
Both police and the District Attorney's Office contend they reacted appropriately.

The Raleigh PD are pigs.

CVS's market cap stands at 25.14B. These folks deserve a piece of it.

130 posted on 07/29/2005 10:34:34 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
It seems DSS and police are quick to make charges before investigating. This happens many times in NC. You are Guilty until you prove yourself not guilty. You should read dss and police guidelines for investigating child abuse in NC. just about any body could be guilty based on those guidelines.Scary Stuff
131 posted on 07/30/2005 8:52:17 PM PDT by lee4519
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson